| Literature DB >> 35175064 |
Inmaculada Márquez1, Gabriel Loewinger2, Juan Pedro Vargas1, Juan Carlos López1, Estrella Díaz1, Guillem R Esber3.
Abstract
Surprising violations of outcome expectancies have long been known to enhance the associability of Pavlovian cues; that is, the rate at which the cue enters into further associations. The adaptive value of such enhancements resides in promoting new learning in the face of uncertainty. However, it is unclear whether associability enhancements reflect increased associative plasticity within a particular behavior system, or whether they can facilitate learning between a cue and any arbitrary outcome, as suggested by attentional models of conditioning. Here, we show evidence consistent with the latter hypothesis. Violating the outcome expectancies generated by a cue in an appetitive setting (feeding behavior system) facilitated subsequent learning about the cue in an aversive setting (defense behavior system). In addition to shedding light on the nature of associability enhancements, our findings offer the neuroscientist a behavioral tool to dissociate their neural substrates from those of other, behavior system- or valence-specific changes. Moreover, our results present an opportunity to utilize associability enhancements to the advantage of counterconditioning procedures in therapeutic contexts. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35175064 PMCID: PMC9396881 DOI: 10.1037/bne0000505
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Behav Neurosci ISSN: 0735-7044 Impact factor: 2.154