Literature DB >> 35175064

Surprise-induced enhancements in the associability of Pavlovian cues facilitate learning across behavior systems.

Inmaculada Márquez1, Gabriel Loewinger2, Juan Pedro Vargas1, Juan Carlos López1, Estrella Díaz1, Guillem R Esber3.   

Abstract

Surprising violations of outcome expectancies have long been known to enhance the associability of Pavlovian cues; that is, the rate at which the cue enters into further associations. The adaptive value of such enhancements resides in promoting new learning in the face of uncertainty. However, it is unclear whether associability enhancements reflect increased associative plasticity within a particular behavior system, or whether they can facilitate learning between a cue and any arbitrary outcome, as suggested by attentional models of conditioning. Here, we show evidence consistent with the latter hypothesis. Violating the outcome expectancies generated by a cue in an appetitive setting (feeding behavior system) facilitated subsequent learning about the cue in an aversive setting (defense behavior system). In addition to shedding light on the nature of associability enhancements, our findings offer the neuroscientist a behavioral tool to dissociate their neural substrates from those of other, behavior system- or valence-specific changes. Moreover, our results present an opportunity to utilize associability enhancements to the advantage of counterconditioning procedures in therapeutic contexts. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35175064      PMCID: PMC9396881          DOI: 10.1037/bne0000505

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 0735-7044            Impact factor:   2.154


  41 in total

1.  Counterconditioning: an effective technique for changing conditioned preferences.

Authors:  Inneke Kerkhof; Debora Vansteenwegen; Frank Baeyens; Dirk Hermans
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2011

2.  Bayesian theories of conditioning in a changing world.

Authors:  Aaron C Courville; Nathaniel D Daw; David S Touretzky
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Negative transfer in human associative learning.

Authors:  Oren Griffiths; Ameika M Johnson; Chris J Mitchell
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-08-22

Review 4.  The attention system of the human brain.

Authors:  M I Posner; S E Petersen
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 12.449

5.  Reconciling the influence of predictiveness and uncertainty on stimulus salience: a model of attention in associative learning.

Authors:  Guillem R Esber; Mark Haselgrove
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Uncertainty and predictiveness determine attention to cues during human associative learning.

Authors:  Tom Beesley; Katherine P Nguyen; Daniel Pearson; Mike E Le Pelley
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 2.143

7.  Reduced return of threat expectancy after counterconditioning verus extinction.

Authors:  Sahaj Kang; Bram Vervliet; Iris M Engelhard; Eva A M van Dis; Muriel A Hagenaars
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2018-06-26

8.  Prediction and uncertainty in associative learning: examining controlled and automatic components of learned attentional biases.

Authors:  David Luque; Miguel A Vadillo; Mike E Le Pelley; Tom Beesley
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 2.143

9.  A model for Pavlovian learning: variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli.

Authors:  J M Pearce; G Hall
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Basal forebrain cholinergic lesions disrupt increments but not decrements in conditioned stimulus processing.

Authors:  A A Chiba; D J Bucci; P C Holland; M Gallagher
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.