Literature DB >> 27174735

Prediction and uncertainty in associative learning: examining controlled and automatic components of learned attentional biases.

David Luque1, Miguel A Vadillo2, Mike E Le Pelley1, Tom Beesley1.   

Abstract

It has been suggested that attention is guided by two factors that operate during associative learning: a predictiveness principle, by which attention is allocated to the best predictors of outcomes, and an uncertainty principle, by which attention is allocated to learn about the less known features of the environment. Recent studies have shown that predictiveness-driven attention can operate rapidly and in an automatic way to exploit known relationships. The corresponding characteristics of uncertainty-driven attention, on the other hand, remain unexplored. In two experiments we examined whether both predictiveness and uncertainty modulate attentional processing in an adaptation of the dot probe task. This task provides a measure of automatic orientation to cues during associative learning. The stimulus onset asynchrony of the probe display was manipulated in order to explore temporal characteristics of predictiveness- and uncertainty-driven attentional effects. Results showed that the predictive status of cues determined selective attention, with faster attentional capture to predictive than to non-predictive cues. In contrast, the level of uncertainty slowed down responses to the probe regardless of the predictive status of the cues. Both predictiveness- and uncertainty-driven attentional effects were very rapid (at 250 ms from cue onset) and were automatically activated.

Keywords:  Associative learning; Attention; Dot probe; Predictiveness; Uncertainty

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27174735     DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1188407

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  7 in total

1.  Reward anticipation and punishment anticipation are instantiated in the brain via opponent mechanisms.

Authors:  Jessica I Lake; Jeffrey M Spielberg; Zachary P Infantolino; Laura D Crocker; Cindy M Yee; Wendy Heller; Gregory A Miller
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  The role of uncertainty in attentional and choice exploration.

Authors:  Adrian R Walker; David Luque; Mike E Le Pelley; Tom Beesley
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-12

3.  Multiple reward-cue contingencies favor expectancy over uncertainty in shaping the reward-cue attentional salience.

Authors:  Matteo De Tommaso; Tommaso Mastropasqua; Massimo Turatto
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-01-25

4.  Surprise-induced enhancements in the associability of Pavlovian cues facilitate learning across behavior systems.

Authors:  Inmaculada Márquez; Gabriel Loewinger; Juan Pedro Vargas; Juan Carlos López; Estrella Díaz; Guillem R Esber
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 2.154

5.  Changes in Cue Configuration Reduce the Impact of Interfering Information in a Predictive Learning Task.

Authors:  Carmelo P Cubillas; Miguel A Vadillo; Helena Matute
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-01-06

6.  Learned predictiveness acquired through experience prevails over the influence of conflicting verbal instructions in rapid selective attention.

Authors:  Pedro L Cobos; Miguel A Vadillo; David Luque; Mike E Le Pelley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Testing reward-cue attentional salience: Attainment and dynamic changes.

Authors:  Matteo De Tommaso; Massimo Turatto
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2021-10-28
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.