Literature DB >> 35174447

Technical Standards for Cancer Surgery: Improving Patient Care through Synoptic Operative Reporting.

Tina J Hieken1, William R Burns2, Amanda B Francescatti3, Arden M Morris4, Sandra L Wong5.   

Abstract

The Operative Standards for Cancer Surgery manuals define critical elements of optimal cancer surgery based on data and expert opinion. These key aspects of commonly performed cancer operations define technical standards that can be used as a quality assurance tool for practicing surgical oncologists and as an educational tool for trainees. This article provides background on these operative standards and their subsequent integration into synoptic operative report templates. With the goal of codifying the most important aspects of surgical oncology care to elevate and harmonize cancer care, the American College of Surgeons Cancer Programs has developed comprehensive synoptic operative reports. Synoptic operative reports are structured so that key data elements are recorded in a standardized format with prespecified terminology. In contrast to the narrative or structured operative reports frequently used by surgeons, these synoptic operative reports improve semantic clarity, provide uniform fields for abstraction, and facilitate passive data collection and real-time analytics while delivering key information for downstream multidisciplinary patient care. In this way, the synoptic operative report is a key component of a comprehensive effort to elevate the quality of cancer care nationally.
© 2022. Society of Surgical Oncology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electronic medical record; Oncology; Quality improvement; Standards; Surgery; Synoptic operative report

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35174447     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11330-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   4.339


  9 in total

1.  Adherence to surgical and oncologic standards improves survival in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Beiqun Zhao; Catherine Tsai; Kelly K Hunt; Sarah L Blair
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 3.454

2.  Improving Outcomes After Distal Pancreatectomy with Celiac Axis Resection (DP-CAR): As Always, it is All About Patient Selection.

Authors:  Naruhiko Ikoma; Matthew H G Katz
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Implementation of a Synoptic Operative Report for Rectal Cancer: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Authors:  Serena S Bidwell; Sylvia Bereknyei Merrell; Gabriela Poles; Arden M Morris
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Completeness of breast cancer operative reports in a community care setting.

Authors:  Jordan Lang Eng; Christopher Ronald Baliski; Colleen McGahan; Eric Cai
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 4.380

5.  Do Better Operative Reports Equal Better Surgery? A Comparative Evaluation of Compliance With Operative Standards for Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Matthew E Reeves; Ross Mudgway; Sarah K Lee; Nikita Kadakia; Chelsea Santos; Kirollos Malek; Naveenraj L Solomon; Sharon S Lum
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 0.688

6.  Quality of narrative operative reports in pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  Meagan E Wiebe; Lakhbir Sandhu; Julie L Takata; Erin D Kennedy; Nancy N Baxter; Anna R Gagliardi; David R Urbach; Alice C Wei
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  Reporting and Abstracting Variability in Technical Standards for Breast Cancer Operations.

Authors:  Sirivan S Seng; Jenny H Chang; June Yoo; Sara Grossi; Zachary Tran; Lucyna Kryzwon; Sasha Swensen; Eric van Baarsel; Jacqueline Chen; EunJee Lee; Ana Jacinto; Ross Mudgway; Jukes Namm; Sharon S Lum
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 2.192

8.  Synoptic operative reporting for laparoscopic cholecystectomy and pancreaticoduodenectomy: A multi institutional pilot study evaluating completeness and surgeon perceptions.

Authors:  Shanley B Deal; Michael I D'Angelica; William G Hawkins; Michael Pucci; Michael Ujiki; L Michael Brunt; Steven Wexner; Adnan A Alseidi
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 9.  Synoptic Reporting: Evidence-Based Review and Future Directions.

Authors:  Andrew A Renshaw; Mercy Mena-Allauca; Edwin W Gould; S Joseph Sirintrapun
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2018-12
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.