BACKGROUND: Quality in health care can be evaluated using quality indicators (QIs). Elements contained in the surgical operative report are potential sources for QI data, but little is known about the completeness of the narrative operative report (NR). We evaluated the completeness of the NR for patients undergoing a pancreaticoduodenectomy. METHODS: We reviewed NRs for patients undergoing a pancreaticoduodenectomy over a 1-year period. We extracted 79 variables related to patient and narrator characteristics, process of care measures, surgical technique and oncology-related outcomes by document analysis. Data were coded and evaluated for completeness. RESULTS: We analyzed 74 NRs. The median number of variables reported was 43.5 (range 13-54). Variables related to surgical technique were most complete. Process of care and oncology-related variables were often omitted. Completeness of the NR was associated with longer operative duration. CONCLUSION: The NRs were often incomplete and of poor quality. Important elements, including process of care and oncology-related data, were frequently missing. Thus, the NR is an inadequate data source for QI. Development and use of alternative reporting methods, including standardized synoptic operative reports, should be encouraged to improve documentation of care and serve as a measure of quality of surgical care.
BACKGROUND: Quality in health care can be evaluated using quality indicators (QIs). Elements contained in the surgical operative report are potential sources for QI data, but little is known about the completeness of the narrative operative report (NR). We evaluated the completeness of the NR for patients undergoing a pancreaticoduodenectomy. METHODS: We reviewed NRs for patients undergoing a pancreaticoduodenectomy over a 1-year period. We extracted 79 variables related to patient and narrator characteristics, process of care measures, surgical technique and oncology-related outcomes by document analysis. Data were coded and evaluated for completeness. RESULTS: We analyzed 74 NRs. The median number of variables reported was 43.5 (range 13-54). Variables related to surgical technique were most complete. Process of care and oncology-related variables were often omitted. Completeness of the NR was associated with longer operative duration. CONCLUSION: The NRs were often incomplete and of poor quality. Important elements, including process of care and oncology-related data, were frequently missing. Thus, the NR is an inadequate data source for QI. Development and use of alternative reporting methods, including standardized synoptic operative reports, should be encouraged to improve documentation of care and serve as a measure of quality of surgical care.
Authors: Robert W Eppsteiner; Nicholas G Csikesz; Jessica P Simons; Jennifer F Tseng; Shimul A Shah Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2008-08-13 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Anand Govindarajan; Novlette Fraser; Vanessa Cranford; Debrah Wirtzfeld; Steve Gallinger; Calvin H L Law; Andrew J Smith; Anna R Gagliardi Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2008-05-13 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Anthony J Gill; Amber L Johns; Robert Eckstein; Jaswinder S Samra; Antony Kaufman; David K Chang; Neil D Merrett; Peter H Cosman; Ross C Smith; Andrew V Biankin; James G Kench Journal: Pathology Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 5.306
Authors: Robert W Eppsteiner; Nicholas G Csikesz; James T McPhee; Jennifer F Tseng; Shimul A Shah Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Floyd W van de Graaf; Marilyne M Lange; Jolanda I Spakman; Wilhelmina M U van Grevenstein; Daan Lips; Eelco J R de Graaf; Anand G Menon; Johan F Lange Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2019-05-01 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Tina J Hieken; William R Burns; Amanda B Francescatti; Arden M Morris; Sandra L Wong Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2022-02-16 Impact factor: 4.339
Authors: Shannon C Wheeler; Amar Miglani; Nicholas L Deep; Marlene E Girardo; Michael Hinni; Devyani Lal Journal: Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol Date: 2019-04-23