Shanley B Deal1, Michael I D'Angelica2, William G Hawkins3, Michael Pucci4, Michael Ujiki5, L Michael Brunt3, Steven Wexner6, Adnan A Alseidi7. 1. Virginia Mason Medical Center, General Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, 1100 9th Avenue, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA. Electronic address: Shanley.Deal@virginiamason.org. 2. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA. 3. Washington University St. Louis, 660 South Euclid Ave, Box 8109, Saint Louis, MO, 63110, USA. 4. Jefferson University Hospital, 1100 Walnut St, 5th Floor, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA. 5. NorthShore University Health System, 1000 Central St #800, Evanston, IL, 60201, USA. 6. Cleveland Clinic, 2950 Cleveland Clinic Blvd, Weston, FL, 33331, USA. 7. Virginia Mason Medical Center, General Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, 1100 9th Avenue, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Synoptic operative reports (SOR) are more accurate than dictated operative reports (DOR) in a few single institution experiences. We sought to examine the completeness of SOR for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) in a multi institutional pilot study. METHODS: Six institutions participated in SOR submission via a web-based survey. One institution collected DOR and case matched historical dictated operative reports (HOR) for subset analysis. A checklist evaluated completeness of all reports. A post-survey assessed participant opinions. RESULTS: 40 PD SORs were 98.5% complete and 35 LC SORs were 99.7% complete. Single institution subset analysis respective percent complete were: 11 PD SORs 99%, DORs 70% and HORs 74% and 14 LC SORs 99.7%, DORs 76%, and HORs 75%. Post-survey results yielded 10 PD and 24 LC responses. An overwhelming majority agreed that SOR were easy to use and would prefer to use SOR compared to DOR. CONCLUSION: SOR are more complete than both study associated DOR and HOR. The majority of surgeons indicated their preference for SOR and their willingness to use them.
BACKGROUND: Synoptic operative reports (SOR) are more accurate than dictated operative reports (DOR) in a few single institution experiences. We sought to examine the completeness of SOR for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) in a multi institutional pilot study. METHODS: Six institutions participated in SOR submission via a web-based survey. One institution collected DOR and case matched historical dictated operative reports (HOR) for subset analysis. A checklist evaluated completeness of all reports. A post-survey assessed participant opinions. RESULTS: 40 PD SORs were 98.5% complete and 35 LC SORs were 99.7% complete. Single institution subset analysis respective percent complete were: 11 PD SORs 99%, DORs 70% and HORs 74% and 14 LC SORs 99.7%, DORs 76%, and HORs 75%. Post-survey results yielded 10 PD and 24 LC responses. An overwhelming majority agreed that SOR were easy to use and would prefer to use SOR compared to DOR. CONCLUSION: SOR are more complete than both study associated DOR and HOR. The majority of surgeons indicated their preference for SOR and their willingness to use them.
Authors: Arielle E Kanters; Joceline V Vu; Ari D Schuman; Inga Van Wieren; Ashley Duby; Karin M Hardiman; Samantha K Hendren Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2019-09-28 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: Tina J Hieken; William R Burns; Amanda B Francescatti; Arden M Morris; Sandra L Wong Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2022-02-16 Impact factor: 4.339
Authors: Garrett G R J Johnson; Harminder Singh; Ashley Vergis; Jason Park; Olivia Hershorn; David Hochman; Ramzi M Helewa Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2021-06-08 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Niall O'Connor; Michael Sugrue; Conor Melly; Gearoid McGeehan; Magda Bucholc; Aileen Crawford; Paul O'Connor; Fikri Abu-Zidan; Imtiaz Wani; Zsolt J Balogh; Vishal G Shelat; Giovanni D Tebala; Belinda De Simone; Hani O Eid; Mircea Chirica; Gustavo P Fraga; Salomone Di Saverio; Edoardo Picetti; Luigi Bonavina; Marco Ceresoli; Andreas Fette; Boris Sakakushe; Emmanouil Pikoulis; Raul Coimbra; Richard Ten Broek; Andreas Hecker; Ari Leppäniemi; Andrey Litvin; Philip Stahel; Edward Tan; Kaoru Koike; Fausto Catena; Michele Pisano; Federico Coccolini; Alison Johnston Journal: World J Emerg Surg Date: 2022-03-17 Impact factor: 5.469
Authors: Lia D Delaney; Kerry M Lindquist; Ryan Howard; Anne P Ehlers; C Ann Vitous; Michael Englesbe; Justin B Dimick; Dana A Telem Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2021-07-14 Impact factor: 3.453