| Literature DB >> 35170841 |
Jun Zheng1, Nana Tang1, Hui Xie1, Bernhard Breit1.
Abstract
Intermolecular photocatalytic hydroaminoalkylation (HAA) of alkenes have emerged as a powerful method for the construction of alkyl amines. Although there are some studies aiming at stereoselective photocatalytic HAA reactions, the alkenes are limited to electrophilic alkenes. Herein, we report a highly regio-, diastereo-, and enantioselective HAA of electron-rich dienol ethers and α-amino radicals derived from α-amino acids using a unified photoredox and palladium catalytic system. This decarboxylative 1,2-Markovnikov addition enables the construction of vicinal amino tertiary ethers with high levels of regio- (up to >19 : 1 rr), diastereo- (up to >19 : 1 dr), and enantioselectivity control (up to >99 % ee). Mechanistic studies support a reversible hydropalladation as a key step.Entities:
Keywords: Amino Acids; Dienol Ethers; Palladium; Photoredox; Stereoselectivity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35170841 PMCID: PMC9314026 DOI: 10.1002/anie.202200105
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl ISSN: 1433-7851 Impact factor: 16.823
Figure 1Concepts for asymmetric photocatalytic HAAs of alkenes and dienes and significance of vicinal amino tertiary alcohols.
Optimization of reaction conditions.[a]
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Entry |
Diene |
X |
Yield [%] |
dr |
ee [%] |
|
1 |
|
5 |
44 |
5.6 : 1 |
94 |
|
2 |
|
7 |
62 |
6.6 : 1 |
97 |
|
3 |
|
9 |
64 |
6.7 : 1 |
97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5[b,d] |
|
7 |
73 |
6.4 : 1 |
97 |
|
6[c,e] |
|
7 |
0 |
– |
– |
|
7[c,f] |
|
7 |
0 |
– |
– |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9[b,c] |
|
7 |
(48) |
16.7 : 1 |
>99.9 |
[a] Reaction conditions (unless otherwise specified): 1 a (0.1 mmol), 2 (0.15 mmol), [(η3‐cinnamyl)PdCp] (x mol %), L3 (2.4×mol %), 3,5‐(CF3)2C6H3CO2H (50 mol %), DMF (1 mL), [[Ir(ppy)2(dtbbpy)]PF6] (1 mol %), 16 h, RT, blue LEDs. NMR yields are reported by using isoquinoline as an internal standard, the isolated yield is presented in parenthesis. Diastereomeric ratio (dr) was determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy of the crude reaction mixture. For all the reactions the regioselectivity (rr) is>19 : 1. The enantiomeric excess (ee) was determined by chiral HPLC analysis. [b] Performed on 0.2 mmol scale. [c] 1.8 equiv 2 was used. [d] 2.0 equiv 2 was used. [e] Without [[Ir(ppy)2(dtbbpy)]PF6]. [f] Without blue LEDs.
Figure 2Scope of N‐aryl amino acids. Reactions were carried out with reaction conditions in Table 1, entry 4, unless otherwise noted. Isolated yields are presented, and ee was determined by chiral HPLC analysis. Diastereoselectivity and regioselectivity were determined by 1H NMR. Unless otherwise noted, rr>19 : 1. [a] DMF was used instead of acetone. [b] 10 mol % [(η3‐cinnamyl)PdCp] and 24 mol % L3 were used. [c] ee was determined after derivatization of corresponding compounds (see the Supporting Information).
Figure 3Scope of 1,3‐dienes. Reactions were carried out with reaction conditions in Table 1, entry 4, unless otherwise noted. Isolated yields are presented, and ee was determined by chiral HPLC analysis. Diastereoselectivity and regioselectivity were determined by 1H NMR or 13C NMR. Unless otherwise noted, rr>19 : 1. [a] DMF was used instead of acetone. [b] 10 mol % [(η3‐cinnamyl)PdCp] and 24 mol % L3 were used.
Figure 4Synthetic applications.
Figure 5Mechanism investigations.
Figure 6Proposed mechanism.