Literature DB >> 27488414

The masculinity paradox: facial masculinity and beardedness interact to determine women's ratings of men's facial attractiveness.

B J W Dixson1, D Sulikowski2, A Gouda-Vossos3, M J Rantala4, R C Brooks3.   

Abstract

In many species, male secondary sexual traits have evolved via female choice as they confer indirect (i.e. genetic) benefits or direct benefits such as enhanced fertility or survival. In humans, the role of men's characteristically masculine androgen-dependent facial traits in determining men's attractiveness has presented an enduring paradox in studies of human mate preferences. Male-typical facial features such as a pronounced brow ridge and a more robust jawline may signal underlying health, whereas beards may signal men's age and masculine social dominance. However, masculine faces are judged as more attractive for short-term relationships over less masculine faces, whereas beards are judged as more attractive than clean-shaven faces for long-term relationships. Why such divergent effects occur between preferences for two sexually dimorphic traits remains unresolved. In this study, we used computer graphic manipulation to morph male faces varying in facial hair from clean-shaven, light stubble, heavy stubble and full beards to appear more (+25% and +50%) or less (-25% and -50%) masculine. Women (N = 8520) were assigned to treatments wherein they rated these stimuli for physical attractiveness in general, for a short-term liaison or a long-term relationship. Results showed a significant interaction between beardedness and masculinity on attractiveness ratings. Masculinized and, to an even greater extent, feminized faces were less attractive than unmanipulated faces when all were clean-shaven, and stubble and beards dampened the polarizing effects of extreme masculinity and femininity. Relationship context also had effects on ratings, with facial hair enhancing long-term, and not short-term, attractiveness. Effects of facial masculinization appear to have been due to small differences in the relative attractiveness of each masculinity level under the three treatment conditions and not to any change in the order of their attractiveness. Our findings suggest that beardedness may be attractive when judging long-term relationships as a signal of intrasexual formidability and the potential to provide direct benefits to females. More generally, our results hint at a divergence of signalling function, which may result in a subtle trade-off in women's preferences, for two highly sexually dimorphic androgen-dependent facial traits.
© 2016 European Society For Evolutionary Biology. Journal of Evolutionary Biology © 2016 European Society For Evolutionary Biology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  facial hair; facial masculinity; masculinity; sexual selection

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27488414     DOI: 10.1111/jeb.12958

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evol Biol        ISSN: 1010-061X            Impact factor:   2.411


  9 in total

1.  More than just a pretty face? The relationship between immune function and perceived facial attractiveness.

Authors:  Summer Mengelkoch; Jeff Gassen; Marjorie L Prokosch; Gary W Boehm; Sarah E Hill
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Are Beards Honest Signals of Male Dominance and Testosterone?

Authors:  Marta Kowal; Piotr Sorokowski; Agnieszka Żelaźniewicz; Judyta Nowak; Sylwester Orzechowski; Grzegorz Żurek; Alina Żurek; Magdalena Nawrat
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-10-21

3.  Effects of Male Facial Masculinity on Perceived Attractiveness.

Authors:  Omid Ekrami; Peter Claes; Mark D Shriver; Seth M Weinberg; Mary L Marazita; Susan Walsh; Stefan Van Dongen
Journal:  Adapt Human Behav Physiol       Date:  2020-11-12

4.  Microbes and masculinity: Does exposure to pathogenic cues alter women's preferences for male facial masculinity and beardedness?

Authors:  Toneya L McIntosh; Anthony J Lee; Morgan J Sidari; Rebecca E Stower; James M Sherlock; Barnaby J W Dixson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Effect of aging and body characteristics on facial sexual dimorphism in the Caucasian Population.

Authors:  Zala Skomina; Miha Verdenik; Nataša Ihan Hren
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Sex Differences in Physical Attractiveness Investments: Overlooked Side of Masculinity.

Authors:  Marta Kowal; Piotr Sorokowski
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Facial hair may slow detection of happy facial expressions in the face in the crowd paradigm.

Authors:  Barnaby J W Dixson; Tamara Spiers; Paul A Miller; Morgan J Sidari; Nicole L Nelson; Belinda M Craig
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  A Comparison of Masculinity Facial Preference Among Naturally Cycling, Pregnant, Lactating, and Post-Menopausal Women.

Authors:  Urszula M Marcinkowska; Grazyna Jasienska; Pavol Prokop
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2017-10-25

9.  The Effect of Target Sex, Sexual Dimorphism, and Facial Attractiveness on Perceptions of Target Attractiveness and Trustworthiness.

Authors:  Yuanyan Hu; Najam Ul Hasan Abbasi; Yang Zhang; Hong Chen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-06-08
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.