Literature DB >> 35165486

[Patient factors influencing preoperative expectations of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty].

Z C Li1, Y F Hou1, Z W Zhou1, L Jiang1, S Zhang1, J H Lin1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the expectations of patients for total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and to analyze its influencing factors.
METHODS: Experimental design: Single center, retrospective, multiple regression analysis. The data including the age, height, and weight of 108 patients undergoing unilateral TKA due to end-stage osteoarthritis were obtained. The patients' preoperative Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee arthroplasty expectation score, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) score, Knee Society score (KSS), the MOS 36-item short-from health survey (SF-36) score, and visual analogue scale (VAS) were evaluated, and the 30-second chair-stand test (30-CST), 40-meter fast-paced walk test (40-FPWT), 12-level stair-climb test (12-SCT), 3-meter timed up-and-go test (TUG), 6-minute walk test (6-MWT), and recorded daily steps for 7 consecutive days were performed. The SPSS 22.0 software was used for statistical analysis. The observed values of various data were described. Pearson correlation analysis was used to evaluate the correlation between various parameters, and the multi-factor linear regression analysis was used to investigate the influencing factors of the patients preoperative expectation scores.
RESULTS: The average expectation score of this group of patients was 58.98±5.44. In the Pearson correlation analysis, the patient's preoperative expectation had a weak correlation to the result of the patient's 12-SCT, TUG, 6-MWT, KSS function score, and SF-36 mental component score (correlation coefficient 0.1-0.3). The patient's preoperative expectation had a moderate correlation to the patient's daily average steps, 30-CST, 40-FPWT, KSS, WOMAC and its pain, stiffness, function scores, SF-36 physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, vitality, and physical component score (correlation coefficient 0.3-0.6). In the multivariate linear regression analysis, only the results of 30-CST and the role-physical, bodily pain and vitality in the SF-36 scale were related to the patient's expectation score (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The estimated expectation score of patients before TKA is not high. Patients with more severe preoperative pain, worse physical function, and lower overall health are more eager to improve after surgery. Thus surgeons must communicate fully with patients with unrealistic expectations before surgery in order to obtain more satisfactory results postoperatively.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Activities of daily living; Arthroplasty, replacement, knee; Patient satisfaction; Recovery of function

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35165486      PMCID: PMC8860662     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban        ISSN: 1671-167X


  35 in total

1.  Patient expectations of hip and knee joint replacement surgery and postoperative health status.

Authors:  Marita Cross; Helen Lapsley; Annica Barcenilla; David Parker; Myles Coolican; Lyn March
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Patient expectations regarding total knee arthroplasty: differences among the United States, United Kingdom, and Australia.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Lingard; Clement B Sledge; Ian D Learmonth
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system.

Authors:  J N Insall; L D Dorr; R D Scott; W N Scott
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Patient Dissatisfaction Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Rajitha Gunaratne; Dylan N Pratt; Joseph Banda; Daniel P Fick; Riaz J K Khan; Brett W Robertson
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee.

Authors:  N Bellamy; W W Buchanan; C H Goldsmith; J Campbell; L W Stitt
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 4.666

6.  Patient expectations predict greater pain relief with joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  Rajiv Gandhi; John Roderick Davey; Nizar Mahomed
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  OARSI recommended performance-based tests to assess physical function in people diagnosed with hip or knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  F Dobson; R S Hinman; E M Roos; J H Abbott; P Stratford; A M Davis; R Buchbinder; L Snyder-Mackler; Y Henrotin; J Thumboo; P Hansen; K L Bennell
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 6.576

8.  Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not?

Authors:  Robert B Bourne; Bert M Chesworth; Aileen M Davis; Nizar N Mahomed; Kory D J Charron
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Validation of Chinese Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) in patients scheduled for total knee replacement.

Authors:  Feng Xie; Shu-Chuen Li; Ron Goeree; Jean-Eric Tarride; Daria O'Reilly; Ngai-Nung Lo; Seng-Jin Yeo; Kuang-Ying Yang; Julian Thumboo
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Patients' Expectations Impact Their Satisfaction following Total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Audrey Neuprez; Jean-Pierre Delcour; Firouzeh Fatemi; Philippe Gillet; Jean-Michel Crielaard; Olivier Bruyère; Jean-Yves Reginster
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.