Literature DB >> 16757751

Patient expectations regarding total knee arthroplasty: differences among the United States, United Kingdom, and Australia.

Elizabeth A Lingard1, Clement B Sledge, Ian D Learmonth.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Total knee arthroplasty is an effective treatment for severe osteoarthritis of the knee. Our aim was to determine whether patients from the United Kingdom, United States, and Australia have different preoperative expectations regarding total knee arthroplasty and whether these expectations have an impact on outcomes and patient satisfaction.
METHODS: Patients from the United Kingdom, the United States, and Australia were recruited into a prospective observational study of primary total knee arthroplasty for the treatment of osteoarthritis. Preoperative expectations, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and Short Form-36 (SF-36) scores, and demographic, socioeconomic, and follow-up data, including satisfaction with outcome, were obtained from self-administered patient questionnaires.
RESULTS: A total of 598 patients with a mean age of sixty-nine years at the time of the index arthroplasty were recruited; 58% were women. The majority of patients expected to have no pain at twelve months after the surgery, and with the numbers available there was no significant difference among the countries with regard to pain expectations. Australian patients were more likely than patients in the United Kingdom or the United States to expect better function at twelve months after the surgery. With the numbers available, satisfaction scores at twelve months did not differ significantly among the countries and were not influenced by preoperative expectations. Australian patients were more likely than patients in the United Kingdom or the United States to be unwilling to undergo total knee arthroplasty again at twelve months under similar circumstances.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients from different countries have different expectations regarding total knee arthroplasty, which are not fully explained by differences in sociodemographic factors, clinical characteristics, and pain and functional status. Australian patients had the highest expectations but, despite reporting similar outcomes and satisfaction following total knee arthroplasty, they were more likely not to want to have the surgery again under similar circumstances.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16757751     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  65 in total

1.  High-flexion TKA in patients with a minimum of 120 degrees of pre-operative knee flexion: outcomes at six years of follow-up.

Authors:  Aree Tanavalee; Srihatach Ngarmukos; Saran Tantavisut; Arak Limtrakul
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-10-24       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Should age be a contraindication for degenerative lumbar surgery?

Authors:  Daniel Pérez-Prieto; Carlos Lozano-Álvarez; Guillem Saló; Antoni Molina; Andreu Lladó; Lluís Puig-Verdié; Manuel Ramírez-Valencia
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Patient expectations and long-term outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis patients: results from the SARA (Silicone Arthroplasty in Rheumatoid Arthritis) study.

Authors:  Kevin C Chung; Kate W Nellans; Patricia B Burns; E F Shaw Wilgis; Frank D Burke; David A Fox; H Myra Kim
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  Effect of surgeon fatigue on hip and knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christopher Peskun; David Walmsley; James Waddell; Emil Schemitsch
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.089

5.  Do patient expectations about arthroplasty at initial presentation for hip or knee pain differ by sex and ethnicity?

Authors:  Carlos J Lavernia; Juan S Contreras; Javad Parvizi; Peter F Sharkey; Robert Barrack; Mark D Rossi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Sports activity is maintained or increased following total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Caroline Hepperger; Peter Gföller; E Abermann; Christian Hoser; Hanno Ulmer; Elmar Herbst; Christian Fink
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Total joint replacement outcomes in patients with concomitant comorbidities: a glass half empty or half full?

Authors:  Elena Losina; Jeffrey N Katz
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2013-05

8.  Reliability and concurrent validity of the Dutch hip and knee replacement expectations surveys.

Authors:  Inge van den Akker-Scheek; Jos J A M van Raay; Inge H F Reininga; Sjoerd K Bulstra; Wiebren Zijlstra; Martin Stevens
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty is affected by their general physical well-being.

Authors:  N D Clement; R Burnett
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Key factors in determining surgical timing of total knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritic patients: age, radiographic severity, and symptomatic severity.

Authors:  Chong Bum Chang; Jae Ho Yoo; In Jun Koh; Yeon Gwi Kang; Sang Cheol Seong; Tae Kyun Kim
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-02-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.