Literature DB >> 35165482

[In vitro evaluation of positioning accuracy of trephine bur at different depths by dynamic navigation].

S M Liu1, Y J Zhao2, X Y Wang1, Z H Wang1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of trephine bur drilling at different depths guided by dynamic navigation system in 3D printing in vitro model.
METHODS: A model at the depth of 5 mm, 10 mm, and 15 mm from the outer surface of which hemispherical cavities was reserved and the 3D printing technology was used to make the standardized model with Veroclear resin. The cone beam CT (CBCT) was taken and the data were imported into the dynamic navigation software (DCARER, China) to establish navigation path programming. Under the guidance of dynamic navigation, a trephine bur with a diameter of 4.5 mm was used to complete the access operation. At each depth, 10 approaches were completed. The postoperative model CBCT was taken. The approach trajectory under navigation was reconstructed and compared with the designed path. The two-dimensional distance deviation, depth deviation, three-dimensional distance deviation, and angle deviation between the actually prepared path and the designed path were calculated.
RESULTS: At the depth of 5 mm, the two-dimensional distance deviation between the end position of the prepared path and the designed path was (0.37±0.06) mm, the depth deviation was (0.06±0.05) mm, the three-dimensional distance deviation was (0.38±0.07) mm, and the angle deviation was 2.46°±0.54°; At the depth of 10 mm, the four deviations between the end position of prepared path and the designed path were (0.44±0.05) mm, (0.16±0.06) mm, (0.47±0.05) mm, and 2.45°±1.21°, respectively; At the depth of 15 mm, the four deviations were (0.52±0.14) mm, (0.16±0.07) mm, (0.55±0.15) mm, and 3.25°±1.22°, respectively. With the increase of entry depth, the three-dimensional and depth accuracy of dynamic navigation system decreased (P < 0.01), and the positioning angle deviation had no relation with the entry depth (P>0.01).
CONCLUSION: Dynamic navigation technology can achieve high positioning accuracy in the depth range of 15 mm, but its deviation increases with the increase of entry depth.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dental models; Dynamic navigation; Fiducial markers; Printing, three-dimensional

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35165482      PMCID: PMC8860656     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban        ISSN: 1671-167X


  22 in total

Review 1.  Stereotactic navigation in oral and maxillofacial surgery.

Authors:  J Collyer
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 1.651

Review 2.  Accuracy of dynamic navigation in implant surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shi-Min Wei; Yu Zhu; Jian-Xu Wei; Chu-Nan Zhang; Jun-Yu Shi; Hong-Chang Lai
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 5.977

3.  Implant Placement Is More Accurate Using Dynamic Navigation.

Authors:  Michael S Block; Robert W Emery; Daniel R Cullum; Ali Sheikh
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 1.895

4.  Dental implants: early versus standard two-stage loading (animal study).

Authors:  Mansour Rismanchian; Farshad Bajoghli; Tabakhian Gholamreza; Mohamad Razavi
Journal:  J Oral Implantol       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 1.779

5.  Accuracy of Dynamic Navigation for Dental Implant Placement-Model-Based Evaluation.

Authors:  Robert W Emery; Scott A Merritt; Kathryn Lank; Jason D Gibbs
Journal:  J Oral Implantol       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 1.779

6.  Targeted Endodontic Microsurgery: Computed Tomography-based Guided Stent Approach with Platelet-rich Fibrin Graft: A Report of 2 Cases.

Authors:  Witold Popowicz; Aleksandra Palatyńska-Ulatowska; Meetu Ralli Kohli
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 4.171

Review 7.  Applications of navigation for orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Samuel L Bobek
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 2.802

8.  Targeted Endodontic Microsurgery: A Retrospective Outcomes Assessment of 24 Cases.

Authors:  Arianne Galino Buniag; Allen M Pratt; Jarom J Ray
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 4.171

9.  Accuracy of Computer-Aided Dynamic Navigation Compared to Computer-Aided Static Navigation for Dental Implant Placement: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Alfonso Mediavilla Guzmán; Elena Riad Deglow; Álvaro Zubizarreta-Macho; Rubén Agustín-Panadero; Sofía Hernández Montero
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  Accuracy of Computer-Aided Dynamic Navigation Compared to Computer-Aided Static Procedure for Endodontic Access Cavities: An in Vitro Study.

Authors:  Álvaro Zubizarreta-Macho; Ana de Pedro Muñoz; Elena Riad Deglow; Rubén Agustín-Panadero; Jesús Mena Álvarez
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.