Literature DB >> 27267658

Accuracy of Dynamic Navigation for Dental Implant Placement-Model-Based Evaluation.

Robert W Emery1,2,3, Scott A Merritt3, Kathryn Lank4, Jason D Gibbs3.   

Abstract

The purpose of this model-based study was to determine the accuracy of placing dental implants using a new dynamic navigation system. This investigation focuses on measurements of overall accuracy for implant placement relative to the virtual plan in both dentate and edentulous models, and provides a comparison with a meta-analysis of values reported in the literature for comparable static guidance, dynamic guidance, and freehand placement studies. This study involves 1 surgeon experienced with dynamic navigation placing implants in models under clinical simulation using a dynamic navigation system (X-Guide, X-Nav Technologies, LLC, Lansdale, Pa) based on optical triangulation tracking. Virtual implants were placed into planned sites using the navigation system computer. Post-implant placement cone-beam scans were taken. These scans were mesh overlaid with the virtual plan and used to determine deviations from the virtual plan. The primary outcome variables were platform and angular deviations comparing the actual placement to the virtual plan. The angular accuracy of implants delivered using the tested device was 0.89° ± 0.35° for dentate case types and 1.26° ± 0.66° for edentulous case types, measured relative to the preoperative implant plan. Three-dimensional positional accuracy was 0.38 ± 0.21 mm for dentate and 0.56 ± 0.17 mm for edentulous, measured from the implant apex.

Keywords:  computer-assisted surgery; dental implants; dynamic image navigation; model study

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27267658     DOI: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-16-00025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Implantol        ISSN: 0160-6972            Impact factor:   1.779


  10 in total

Review 1.  Accuracy assessment of dynamic computer-aided implant placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Adrià Jorba-García; Albert González-Barnadas; Octavi Camps-Font; Rui Figueiredo; Eduard Valmaseda-Castellón
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  [In vitro evaluation of positioning accuracy of trephine bur at different depths by dynamic navigation].

Authors:  S M Liu; Y J Zhao; X Y Wang; Z H Wang
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2022-02-18

3.  The Workflow of a New Dynamic Navigation System for the Insertion of Dental Implants in the Rehabilitation of Edentulous Jaws: Report of Two Cases.

Authors:  Armando Lopes; Miguel de Araújo Nobre; Diogo Santos
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 4.  The Modern and Digital Transformation of Oral Health Care: A Mini Review.

Authors:  Muhammad Syafiq Alauddin; Ahmad Syukran Baharuddin; Mohd Ifwat Mohd Ghazali
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-25

5.  Comparison of implant placement accuracy in two different preoperative digital workflows: navigated vs. pilot-drill-guided surgery.

Authors:  Johannes Spille; Feilu Jin; Christian Flörke; Jörg Wiltfang; Eleonore Behrens; Yahya Açil; Jürgen Lichtenstein; Hendrik Naujokat; Aydin Gülses
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2021-04-30

6.  A novel application of dynamic guided navigation system in immediate implant placement.

Authors:  Po-Jan Kuo; Chi-Yu Lin; Tsung-Fu Hung; Hsien-Chung Chiu; Hsin-Yu Kuo
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 2.080

7.  The influence of cone beam computed tomography on IRIS-100 implant navigation system.

Authors:  Pei-Ling Lai; Meng-Chen Lee; Chih-Te Liu; Po-Sung Fu; Ting-Hsun Lan; Jen-Chyan Wang; Chun-Cheng Hung
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 3.719

8.  Accuracy of intraoral real-time navigation versus static, CAD/CAM-manufactured pilot drilling guides in dental implant surgery: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Robert Stünkel; Alexander-Nicolai Zeller; Thomas Bohne; Florian Böhrnsen; Edris Wedi; David Raschke; Philipp Kauffmann
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2022-10-06

9.  Comparing Accuracy of Implant Installation with a Navigation System (NS), a Laboratory Guide (LG), NS with LG, and Freehand Drilling.

Authors:  Ting-Mao Sun; Huey-Er Lee; Ting-Hsun Lan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-03-22       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Accuracy of Computer-Assisted Dynamic Navigation as a Function of Different Intraoral Reference Systems: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Sigmar Schnutenhaus; Anne Knipper; Martin Wetzel; Cornelia Edelmann; Ralph Luthardt
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-21       Impact factor: 3.390

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.