| Literature DB >> 35164259 |
Areej Al-Qahtani1, Jamaan Ajarem2, Mohammad K Okla1, Samina Rubnawaz3, Saud A Alamri1, Wahidah H Al-Qahtani4, Ahmad R Al-Himaidi2, Hamada Abd Elgawad5, Nosheen Akhtar6, Saleh N Maodaa2, Mostafa A Abdel-Maksoud2.
Abstract
The use of natural products as therapeutic agents is rapidly growing recently. In the current study, we investigated the protective effects of green tea supplementation on lead-induced toxicity in mice. Forty albino mice were divided into four groups as follows: A: control group; B: green tea receiving group; C: lead-intoxicated group; and D: lead-intoxicated group supplemented with green tea. At the end of the experiment, the animals were tested for neurobehavioral and biochemical alterations. Green tea was analyzed through Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS) analysis. We found that supplementation with green tea ameliorated the lead-associated increase in body weight and blood glucose. Green tea supplementation also changed the blood picture that was affected due to lead toxicity and ameliorated lead-induced dyslipidemia. The group of mice that were supplemented with green tea has shown positive alterations in locomotory, anxiety, memory, and learning behaviors. The GC/MS analysis revealed many active ingredients among which the two most abundant were caffeine and 1,2-benzenedicarboxylic acid, mono(2-ethylhexyl) ester. We concluded that green tea supplementation has several positive effects on the lead-induced neurotoxicity in mice and that these effects may be attributed to its main two active ingredients.Entities:
Keywords: GC/MS; caffeine; dyslipidemia; lead toxicity; neurobehavior
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35164259 PMCID: PMC8839307 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27030993
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Effect of green tea supplementation on the body weight and water consumption in the lead-intoxicated mice.
| Groups | Body wt. (g) | Water Consumption (mL) |
|---|---|---|
| Control | 34.30 ± 1.72 | 13.75 ± 0.15 |
| Green tea group (GTE) | 33.29 ± 2.42 | 14.49 ± 0.34 |
| Lead group (Pb) | 37.9 ± 1.07 * | 10.02 ± 0.17 * |
| Lead + GT group (GTE + Pb) | 35.19 ± 1.14 | 12.10 ± 0.16 |
Mean ± SEM., n = 10. * p < 0.05 for lead intoxicated group vs. control.
Effect of green tea supplementation on the cell blood count (CBC) of mice.
| Parameters | Control | Green Tea Group | Lead Group | Lead + GT Group |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RBCs | 7.73 ± 0.13 | 8.10 ± 0.15 | 8.45 ± 0.24 | 8.16 ± 0.33 |
| WBCs | 7.01 ± 0.22 | 6.36 ± 1.20 | 9.34 ± 1.55 * | 8.03 ± 1.28 |
| Hb | 14.02 ± 0.51 | 15.08 ± 0.21 | 12.58 ± 0.35 | 13.74 ± 0.60 |
| HCT | 43.92 ± 1.65 | 47.66 ± 0.49 # | 49.60 ± 1.33 * | 43.86 ± 1.62 |
| MCV | 56.08 ± 2.11 | 59.00 ± 0.95 | 58.80 ± 0.86 | 53.80 ± 0.66 |
| MCH | 18.16 ± 0.62 | 18.62 ± 0.31 | 18.44 ± 0.39 | 16.84 ± 0.21 |
| MCHC | 31.96 ± 0.28 | 31.66 ± 0.14 | 31.42 ± 0.26 | 31.32 ± 0.22 |
| PLT | 657.8 ± 17.9 | 663.6 ± 19.2 | 793 ± 78.37 * | 685.6 ± 23.8 & |
Mean ± SEM., n = 10. * p < 0.05 for lead intoxicated group vs. control; # p < 0.05 for green tea group vs. control; & p < 0.05 for lead +GT group vs. control.
Figure 1Effect of green tea supplementation on the blood glucose (mg/dL) level. Values are represented as Mean ± SEM., n = 10. * = p < 0.05.
Figure 2(a) Effect of green tea supplementation on the cholesterol level. (b) Effect of green tea supplementation on the triglycerides level. (c) Effect of green tea supplementation on the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) level. Mean ± SEM., n = 10. * = p < 0.05, ** = p < 0.01.
Figure 3Effect of green tea supplementation on the lead concentration in blood. Mean ± SEM., n = 10. * = p < 0.05, ** = p < 0.01.
Figure 4Effect of green tea supplementation on the lead concentration in the brain. Mean ± SEM., n = 10. * = p < 0.05, ** = p < 0.01.
Locomotory behavior testing in the experimental groups in the open area. * p < 0.05 for lead group vs. control.
| Test | Control | Green Tea Group | Lead Group | Lead + GT Group |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of squares-crossed | 385 | 393 | 297 * | 358 & |
| No. of rears | 19 | 21 | 12 * | 18 |
| No. of wall-rears | 38 | 40 | 24 * | 33 &+ |
| No. of washings | 7 | 6 | 10 * | 8 |
| Locomotion duration (s) | 190.6 | 197.7 | 104.8 * | 139.4 &+ |
| Immobility duration | 110.5 | 103.9 | 198 * | 121.3 &+ |
Values are Mean ± SEM., n = 10 * p < 0.05 for lead group vs. green tea group. & p < 0.05 for lead +GT group vs. control group. + p < 0.05 for lead +GT group vs. green tea group.
Anxiety in plus-maze.
| Parameter | Control | Green Tea Group | Lead Group | Lead + GT Group Pb |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of entries into Open arm | 7.3 ± 1.71 | 9 ± 0.92 | 6.8 ± 0.64 | 7.1 ± 0.81 |
| Time spent in the open arm (s) | 170 ± 0.28 | 173 ± 0.19 | 60 ± 0.2 *# | 129 ± 0.19 &+ |
| No. of entries into closed arm | 4.9 ± 0.87 | 4.5 ± 1.09 | 6.5 ± 0.66 *# | 5.6 ± 1.78 |
| Time spent in the closed arm (s) | 85.8 ± 0.56 | 83 ± 0.24 | 150 ± 0.23 *# | 110 ± 0.27 &+ |
| Time spent on the maze center (s) | 40 ± 0.47 | 38 ± 0.34 | 57 ± 0.29 *# | 48 ± 0.16 &+ |
Values are Mean ± SEM., n = 10. * p < 0.05 for lead group vs. control. # p < 0.05 for lead group vs. green tea group. & p < 0.05 for lead +GT group vs. control group. + p < 0.05 for lead +GT group vs. green tea group.
Learning and memory test in automatic reflex conditioner (shuttle box).
| Test | Control | Green Tea Group | Lead Group | Lead + GT Group |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| La (s) | 120 ± 1.22 | 100 ± 0.99 | 150 ± 1.45 *# | 125 ± 1.69 + |
| Ic | 60 ± 1.6 | 63 ± 1.76 | 35 ± 0.37 *# | 49 ± 1.32 &+ |
| St | 2.7 ± 0.4 | 2.9 ± 0.45 | 0.3 ± 0.33 *# | 2.3 ± 0.26 |
| Re | 21.8 ± 2.41 | 21 ± 0.47 | 20.4 ± 1.76 | 20.7± 0.96 |
| Tr | 5.5 ± 2.45 | 6.1 ± 0.37 | 9.3 ± 1.9 *# | 7.1 ± 0.99 & |
Values are mean ± SEM., n = 10. * p < 0.05 for lead group vs. control. # p < 0.05 for lead group vs. green tea group. & p < 0.05 for lead +GT group vs. control group. + p < 0.05 for lead +GT group vs. green tea group.
Figure 5Chromatograms for the (a) aqueous extracts and (b) the ethanolic extract of green tea. (x-axis = Retention time; y-axis = % intensity/% abundance).
Figure 6Chemical structure of caffeine and 1,2-benzenedicarboxylic acid, mono(2-ethylhexyl) ester.