| Literature DB >> 35161296 |
Jun He1, Zhongyu Yu1, Jiafu Jiang1, Sumei Chen1, Weimin Fang1, Zhiyong Guan1, Yuan Liao1, Zhenxing Wang1, Fadi Chen1, Haibin Wang1.
Abstract
Whole genome duplication, associated with the induction of widespread genetic changes, has played an important role in the evolution of many plant taxa. All extant angiosperm species have undergone at least one polyploidization event, forming either an auto- or allopolyploid organism. Compared with allopolyploidization, however, few studies have examined autopolyploidization, and few studies have focused on the response of genetic changes to autopolyploidy. In the present study, newly synthesized C. nankingense autotetraploids (Asteraceae) were employed to characterize the genome shock following autopolyploidization. Available evidence suggested that the genetic changes primarily involved the loss of old fragments and the gain of novel fragments, and some novel sequences were potential long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons. As Ty1-copia and Ty3-gypsy elements represent the two main superfamilies of LTR retrotransposons, the dynamics of Ty1-copia and Ty3-gypsy were evaluated using RT-PCR, transcriptome sequencing, and LTR retrotransposon-based molecular marker techniques. Additionally, fluorescence in situ hybridization(FISH)results suggest that autopolyploidization might also be accompanied by perturbations of LTR retrotransposons, and emergence retrotransposon insertions might show more rapid divergence, resulting in diploid-like behaviour, potentially accelerating the evolutionary process among progenies. Our results strongly suggest a need to expand the current evolutionary framework to include a genetic dimension when seeking to understand genomic shock following autopolyploidization in Asteraceae.Entities:
Keywords: Asteraceae; Chrysanthemum; autopolyploidization; evolution; genome duplication
Year: 2022 PMID: 35161296 PMCID: PMC8839533 DOI: 10.3390/plants11030315
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Figure 1Identification of materials using flow cytometry, cytogenetics (bar = 10 μm), and morphology (bar = 1 cm). (The reference peak of diploid materials is 100 in flow cytometry examination).
Figure 2DNA-AFLP profiling of diploid and autotetraploid line 1 (T1) of C. nankingense. The arrows indicate genome changes.
Analysis of sequence premature transcription termination and the fragment length of Ty1RT.
| Fragment Length | Premature Transcription Termination Number/Total Number | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| 263 | 1/37 | 2.7% |
| 216 | 4/4 | 100% |
| 221 | 1/1 | 100% |
| 225 | 1/1 | 100% |
| 226 | 2/2 | 100% |
| 231 | 1/1 | 100% |
| 232 | 4/4 | 100% |
| 250 | 1/1 | 100% |
| 254 | 2/2 | 100% |
| 255 | 0/1 | 0% |
| 261 | 1/1 | 100% |
| 264 | 1/1 | 100% |
| 265 | 1/1 | 100% |
| 266 | 0/7 | 0% |
| 274 | 1/1 | 100% |
| 276 | 0/1 | 0% |
| 302 | 1/1 | 100% |
| 317 | 3/3 | 100% |
| 332 | 1/1 | 100% |
| 386 | 4/4 | 100% |
| 401 | 1/1 | 100% |
Figure 3Amino acid analysis of the RT region of the LTR retrotransposon. (a) WebLogo plot of amino acid frequencies at conserved regions of Ty1RT and Ty3RT of C. nankingense. Positions are relative to the 5′ end of the target site. N, length of the target site. Logos were generated using WebLogo. (b) WebLogo plot of amino acid frequencies at conserved regions of the Ty1RT and Ty3RT sequences of different species. Positions are relative to the 5′ end of the target site. N, length of the target site. Logos were generated using WebLogo. (c) The phylogenies of Ty1RT and Ty3RT using neighbor-joining trees. According to the BlastX results, homologous sequences from other species were the most related sequences in the NCBI database.
Figure 4Transcriptional activation of LTR retrotransposons following autopolyploidization. (a) Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of the Ty1RT and Ty3RT sequences of diploid (tissue-cultured and non-tissue-cultured) and tetraploid species of C. nankingense. The Ty1RT bands at the bottom of the gel show non-specific amplification. (b) Analysis of the differentially expressed genes of diploid and tetraploid species of C. nankingense. (c) Analysis of the Ty1-copia, Ty3-gypsy, and non-LTR-type retrotransposons of diploid and tetraploid species of C. nankingense.
Figure 5Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis of diploid and tetraploid species of C. nankingense (bar = 10 μm). (a) FISH result of Ty1/copia-RT (green) and Ty3/gypsy-RT (red) in diploid and tetraploid species of C. nankingense. (b) All channels merged images of diploid and tetraploid species of C. nankingense. (c) The statistical results of fluorescence intensity between diploid and tetraploid species of C. nankingense.
Figure 6The conservative motifs of CnMp1and CnMp2. Entire conserved signatures among retroelements are indicated with black shading; partially conserved signatures are indicated with grey shading.
Figure 7SSAP profiles of diploid and tetraploid (T1) species of C. nankingense. The LTR-specific primers were designed from CnMp1 (a) and CnMp2 (b).