| Literature DB >> 35627279 |
Jun He1, Yong Zhao1, Shuangshuang Zhang1, Yanze He1, Jiafu Jiang1, Sumei Chen1, Weimin Fang1, Zhiyong Guan1, Yuan Liao1, Zhenxing Wang1, Fadi Chen1, Haibin Wang1.
Abstract
Ribosomal DNA (rDNA) is an excellent cytogenetic marker owing to its tandem arrangement and high copy numbers. However, comparative studies have focused more on the number of rDNA site variations within the Chrysanthemum genus, and studies on the types of rDNA sites with the same experimental procedures at the species levels are lacking. To further explore the number and types of rDNA site variations, we combined related data to draw ideograms of the rDNA sites of Chrysanthemum accessions using oligonucleotide fluorescence in situ hybridization (Oligo-FISH). Latent variations (such as polymorphisms of 45S rDNA sites and co-localized 5S-45S rDNA) also occurred among the investigated accessions. Meanwhile, a significant correlation was observed between the number of 5S rDNA sites and chromosome number. Additionally, the clumped and concentrated geographical distribution of different ploidy Chrysanthemum accessions may significantly promote the karyotype evolution. Based on the results above, we identified the formation mechanism of rDNA variations. Furthermore, these findings may provide a reliable method to examine the sites and number of rDNA variations among Chrysanthemum and its related accessions and allow researchers to further understand the evolutionary and phylogenetic relationships of the Chrysanthemum genus.Entities:
Keywords: 45S rDNA; 5S rDNA; Asteraceae; Chrysanthemum; oligonucleotide fluorescence in situ hybridization (Oligo-FISH)
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35627279 PMCID: PMC9141308 DOI: 10.3390/genes13050894
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genes (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4425 Impact factor: 4.141
Investigated materials with numbers and locations of 5S and 45S rDNA sites in the Chrysanthemum genus.
| Accession | Taxon | Source | No. of 5S rDNA Sites | No. of 45S rDNA Sites | Chromosome Number | Source of Data |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NAU001 |
| Nanjing, Jiangsu | 2 | 7 | 2n = 2x = 18 | He et al. [ |
| NAU002 |
| Xingtai, Hebei | 2 | 8 | 2n = 2x = 18 | He et al. [ |
| NAU004 |
| Wushan, Chongqing | 4 | 5 | 2n = 2x = 18 | He et al. [ |
| NAU006 |
| Tianzhushan, Shaanxi | 2 | 9 | 2n = 2x = 18 | He et al. [ |
| NAU007 |
| Botanical garden, Beijing | 2 | 7 | 2n = 2x = 18 | He et al. [ |
| NAU010 | Shennongjia, Hubei | 2 | 3 | 2n = 2x = 18 | This study | |
| NAU011 |
| Meiligeng, Neimenggu | 3 | 3 | 2n = 2x = 18 | This study |
| NAU015 |
| Zhangjiakou, Hebei | 6 | 8 | 2n = 6x = 54 | This study |
| NAU027 |
| Yuntaishan, Henan | 2 | 8 | 2n = 2x = 18 | He et al. [ |
| NAU029 |
| Wuyishan, Fujian | 2 | 6 | 2n = 2x = 18 | He et al. [ |
| NAU030 |
| Shennongjia, Hubei | 2 | 10 | 2n = 2x = 18 | He et al. [ |
| NAU031 |
| Wuhan, Hubei | 3 | 6 | 2n = 2x = 18 | This study |
| NAU032 |
| Nanchang, Jiangxi | 4 | 6 | 2n = 4x = 36 | This study |
| NAU033 |
| Lushan, Jiangxi | 4 | 4 | 2n = 4x = 36 | This study |
| NAU047 |
| Tianzhushan, Shaanxi | 4 | 9 | 2n = 4x = 36 | This study |
| NAU077 |
| Botanical garden, Beijing | 2 | 8 | 2n = 2x = 18 | This study |
| NAU079 |
| Taibaishan, Shaanxi | 4 | 5 | 2n = 4x = 36 | This study |
| NAU172 |
| Nanjing, Jiangsu | 4 | 17 | 2n = 4x = 36 | This study |
Figure 1Identification of materials using cytogenetics (black bar = 10 μm) and morphological analysis (white bar = 1 cm): (a) Chrysanthemum indicum (Wuhan, Hubei) (NAU031); (b) C. lavandulifolium var. aromaticum (NAU010); (c) C. indicum (Botanical Garden, Beijing) (NAU077); (d) C. mongolicum (NAU011); (e) C. indicum (Lushan, Jiangxi) (NAU033); (f) C. indicum (Tianzhushan, Shaanxi) (NAU047); (g) C. indicum (Nanchang, Jiangxi) (NAU032); (h) C. indicum (Taibaishan, Shaanxi) (NAU079); (i) C. nankingense (NAU172); (j) C. naktongense (NAU015).
Figure 2Geographic distribution of related Chrysanthemum accessions: (a) whole geographic distribution map of Chrysanthemum accessions; (b) a detailed map of the blue dotted area; (c) detailed topography amplitude map of the blue dotted area.
Figure 3Distribution of 5S (red) and 45S (green) rDNA sites detected by Oligo-FISH: (a) Chrysanthemum indicum (Wuhan, Hubei) (NAU031); (b) C. lavandulifolium var. aromaticum (NAU010); (c) C. indicum (Botanical Garden, Beijing) (NAU077); (d) C. mongolicum (NAU011); (e) C. indicum (Lushan, Jiangxi) (NAU033); (f) C. indicum (Tianzhushan, Shaanxi) (NAU047); (g) C. indicum (Nanchang, Jiangxi) (NAU032); (h) C. indicum (Taibaishan, Shaanxi) (NAU079); (i) C. nankingense (NAU172); (j) C. naktongense (NAU015). Scale bars, 10 µm.
Figure 4The number of rDNA sites versus the chromosome number (N = 18). The lines show the grouping of the ploidy levels into diploids and tetraploids according to t-test: (a) *** p < 0.001; (b) ns p > 0.05 (the hollow blue scatter point is the outlier and was excluded in t-test).
Figure 5Idiograms of the rDNA sites of Chrysanthemum mitotic metaphase chromosomes. The 5S rDNA sites (red), 45S rDNA sites (green), and colocalized sites are marked by boxes with white dotted lines.