| Literature DB >> 35160118 |
Adrian Eugen Roşca1,2, Ana-Maria Vlădăreanu3, Radu Mirica4, Cristina-Mihaela Anghel-Timaru1, Alina Mititelu3, Bogdan Ovidiu Popescu5, Constantin Căruntu1,6, Suzana Elena Voiculescu1, Şerban Gologan7, Minodora Onisâi3, Iuliana Iordan3,8, Leon Zăgrean1.
Abstract
Taurine is a semi-essential, the most abundant free amino acid in the human body, with a six times higher concentration in platelets than any other amino acid. It is highly beneficial for the organism, has many therapeutic actions, and is currently approved for heart failure treatment in Japan. Taurine has been repeatedly reported to elicit an inhibitory action on platelet activation and aggregation, sustained by in vivo, ex vivo, and in vitro animal and human studies. Taurine showed effectiveness in several pathologies involving thrombotic diathesis, such as diabetes, traumatic brain injury, acute ischemic stroke, and others. As human prospective studies on thrombosis outcome are very difficult to carry out, there is an obvious need to validate existing findings, and bring new compelling data about the mechanisms underlying taurine and derivatives antiplatelet action and their antithrombotic potential. Chloramine derivatives of taurine proved a higher stability and pronounced selectivity for platelet receptors, raising the assumption that they could represent future potential antithrombotic agents. Considering that taurine and its analogues display permissible side effects, along with the need of finding new, alternative antithrombotic drugs with minimal side effects and long-term action, the potential clinical relevance of this fascinating nutrient and its derivatives requires further consideration.Entities:
Keywords: coagulation; hemostasis/haemostasis; platelet activity; platelet aggregation; platelet reactivity; prothrombotic state; taurine; taurine derivatives/analogues; thrombosis; thrombotic diathesis
Year: 2022 PMID: 35160118 PMCID: PMC8837186 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11030666
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Med ISSN: 2077-0383 Impact factor: 4.241
Figure 1Figure illustrating the influence of taurine and its derivatives (T) on various processes involved in platelet activation and aggregation. The proposed mechanisms of action (indicated by red arrows) are the following: 1. T inhibits platelet aggregation triggered by collagen, which is a strong platelet activator, but also an adhesion surface, being responsible for platelet adhesion (a); 2. T inhibits platelet activation and secretion (b) and consequently the process of platelet aggregation (c) by: (1) controlling intracellular calcium concentration-[Ca2+]ic (limiting the calcium influx and suppressing the intraplatelet calcium (Ca2+) response to activating agonists); (2) down-regulating a growth modulator, β-thromboglobulin (β-TG) and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) release response to agonists, as markers of discharge from alpha and dense platelet granules; (3) decreasing the platelet cyclooxygenase activity and the platelet thromboxane A2 (TxA2) production; (4) suppressing platelet aggregation triggered by various agonists, such as adenosine diphosphate (ADP), thrombin, epinephrine, or platelet activation factor (PAF); (5) increasing of the endothelial nitric oxide (NO) release and prostacyclin (PgI2) production and decreasing TxA2 release. Other used abbreviations: GP—glycoprotein; vWF—von Willebrand factor; FBG—fibrinogen; PLC—phospholipase C; PIP2 (membr)—phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate from platelet plasmalemma; IP3—inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate; DAG—1,2-diacylglycerol; PKC—protein kinase C; DG—dense granule; AG—alfa-granule; 5-HT—5-hydroxytryptamine; PAF-R—PAF receptor; PAR1,4—protease-activated receptor-1 and -4; P2Y1—purinergic receptor 2Y1; P2Y12—purinergic receptor 2Y12; IP—prostacyclin receptor; TP—TxA2 receptor; α2 A-AR—alpha 2A adrenergic receptor; AC—adenylyl cyclase; cAMP—cyclic adenosine monophosphate; GC—guanylate cyclase; cGMP—cyclic guanosine monophosphate; PLA—phospholipase A; ArAc—arachidonic acid; COX—cyclooxygenase; PgG2—prostaglandin G2; PgH2—prostaglandin H2; (+) on the arrow represents up-regulation, (−) on the arrow represents down-regulation.
The characteristics of included animal studies.
| Reference | Animal Subjects, Sex, Number of Animals per Group, Type of Experiment | Taurine or | Design of the Study (Taurine Dose, Time of Administration) | Platelet Aggregation Variation (Agonist) | Outcome from Other Assays of Platelet Function (Agonist), or from Animal Models of Thrombosis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kurachi, M. et al., 1987 [ | Guinea pigs, in vitro | Taurine | 40 nM, 2 min before adding the agonist | ↓ (PAF) | |
| Hayes, KC. et al., 1989 [ | Cats, males and females with equal distribution, | Taurine | 0.5 g T/kg diet (from the time of weaning to the age of 10–24 months) | ↓ (↑PAt by 140% in T-supplemented vs. T-deficient cats, when triggered with collagen) | ↑ of platelet GSH concentration by 53% in T-supplemented vs. T-deficient cats |
| Ji, Y. et al., 1995 [ | Rats (2k1c), | Taurine | 30 mg/kg/day, for 9 weeks |
↓ from 95.95 ± 2.13 (C group) to 87.63 ± 4.47 (T group) (ADP, 4 µmol/L) ↓ from 88.22 ± 3.81 (C) to 74.92 ± 7.56 (T) (thrombin, 4 U/mL) | |
| Huang, HL. et al., 1995 [ | Rats, | Taurine | 100 mg/kg | ↓ of thrombosis wet weight by a rate of 47.82%, vs. controls | |
| Rats, | Taurine | 100 mg/kg |
↓ by a rate of 37.40% (T vs. C group) (ADP, 2 µmol/L) ↓ by a rate of 44.41% (T vs. C group) (collagen, 0.05 mL/mL PRP) ↓ by a rate of 37.87% (T vs. C group) (thrombin, 1 U/mL) | ↓ platelet TxA2 release (ADP) | |
| Park, IS. et al., 2007 [ | Rats, | Taurine | 5% in diet, for 4 weeks |
↓ MAgr from 19.46 ± 3.20 to 14.36 ± 1.85 (T vs. C group) (ADP, 2 µM) ↓ MAgr from 17.13 ± 3.72 to 14.20 ± 3.06 (Ch. + T group vs. Ch. alone fed group of rats) (ADP, 2 µM) | |
| Roşca, A. et al., 2013 [ | Rats, males, | Taurine | 2% in drinking water, for 3 months | ↓ (ADP, 2.5 µM) | |
| Roşca, A. et al., 2013 [ | Rats, males, | Taurine | 2% in drinking water, for 3 months | N outcome for MA measured by TEG | |
| Murina, M.A. et al., 2002 [ | Mice, in vivo | DT |
3.4–6.8 mg/kg 6.8 mg/kg |
↓ mortality rate from 96% in controls to up to 10% in DT group (ADP, 300 mg/kg) ↑ survival rate from 16% in controls to 64% in DT group (administered mixture: 15 mg/kg collagen and 8.6 mg/kg epinephrine) | |
| Mice, male, ex vivo | DT | 6.8 mg/kg, i.v | ↓ by a rate of 50% (DT vs. C group) (ADP, 10 µM) | ||
| Murina, M.A. et al., 2007 [ | Rabbits, in vitro | DT | 10 µM | ↓ ISALS by half (ADP, 0.2 µM) | |
| Rabbits, in vitro | DT | 10 millimoles/L | ↓ markedly the impedance measured by whole blood aggregometry (ADP, 10 µM) | ||
| Kaptanoglu, L. et al., 2008 [ | Rat, | TL | 10 mg, or 20 mg, i.v; | ↓ of thrombus weight by a rate of 42 % vs. C (but significantly higher than that in heparin treated group). | |
| Murina, M.A. et al., 2009 [ | Rabbits, in vitro |
DT CT, or CMT |
0.2 mM 0.5 mM |
↓ ISALS by 50% (ADP, 10 µM) ↓ ISALS by 10% (ADP, 10 µM) | |
| Murina, M.A. et al., 2014 [ | Rabbits, in vitro |
PCT IPCT |
1 mM 1 mM |
↓ to 38 ± 4.1% vs. baseline (100%) (ADP, 10 µM) ↓ to 60 ± 4.2 % vs. baseline (100%) (ADP, 10 µM) |
Abbreviations: PAF—platelet aggregating factor; n—number of subjects per group; T—taurine; PAt—the amount in µg of agonist required to elicit 10% of a predetermined maximal aggregation in 1 mL PRP; PRP—platelet rich plasma; GSH—glutathione; 2k1c—two-kidney-one-clip Goldblatt renovascular hypertensive rats; C—controls; TxA2—thromboxane A2; ADP—adenosine diphosphate; MAgr—the maximum platelet aggregation at the point where aggregation dissociates; Ch.—cholesterol; MA—maximal clot strength and stability; TEG—Thromboelastography; DT—N,N-dichlorotaurine; ISALS—intensity of small-angle light scattering aggregation; CT—N-chlorotaurine; CMT—N-chloro-N-methyltaurine; TL—Taurolidine; PCT—N-propionyl-N-chlorotaurine; IPCT—N-isopropyl-N-chlorotaurine; ↑—up regulation; ↓—down-regulation; N—neutral effect.
The characteristics of included human studies.
| Reference | Human Subjects, Sex, | Taurine or Related | Design of the Study | Platelet Aggregation Variation (Agonist) | Outcome from Other Assays |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Almazov, V.A. et al., 1985 [ | Human platelets, | Taurine | 25 nM | ↓ by half (ADP—3.5 µM) | |
| Human platelets, | Taurine | 25 nM | ↑ of platelet Ca, Mg-ATPase activity by 45% | ||
| Hayes, K.C. et al., 1989 [ | Healthy volunteers, male, | Taurine | 400 mg/day, for 8 days | ↓ (↑PAt by 25% in T group vs. controls, when triggered with collagen) | ↑ of platelet GSH concentration by 34% |
| Healthy volunteers, male, | Taurine | 1600 mg/day, for 8 days | ↓ (↑PAt by 72% in T group vs. controls, when triggered with collagen) | ↓ platelet TxB2 release (collagen, 0.93 µg) | |
| Franconi, F. et al., 1994 [ |
Human platelets from IDD patients, six experiments, in vitro Human platelets from IDD patients, four experiments, in vitro | Taurine |
10 mM increasing dose (10−6, 10−5, or 10−2 mol/L) |
↓ (arach. ac, various concentrations—from 0.2 to 1 mM) ↓ (arach. ac, 0.6 mmol/L) | |
|
IDD patients, IDD patients, | Taurine | 1.5 g/day, for 3 months |
↓ (↑ED50, from 0.44 ± 0.07 mmol/L to 0.72 ± 0.04 mmol/L arach. ac) ↓ (arach. ac, various concentration—up to 1 mmol/L) | ||
| Spohr, C. et al., 2005 [ | Men with predisposition to type II diabetes mellitus, | Taurine | 1.5 g/day, for two 8-week periods (separated by 2 weeks of washout) | N outcome (TC: 3.86 ± 3.25 µmol/l for T group; 3.86 ± 2.21 µmol/l for placebo group) | |
| Namba, K. et al., 1992 [ | Human platelets from non-pregnant women, | Taurine | increasing dose (6.25, 25, or 50 mM) | ↓ with 25.6% to 42.4% (ADP, 0.5–1.5 µM), and with 29.5% to 36.7% (collagen, 0.5–1.25 µg/mL) |
↓ ATP release response with 29.2% to 61.1%–triggered by ADP (0.5–1.5 µM), and with 54.5% to 57.9%—triggered by collagen (0.5–1.25 µg/mL) ↓ β-TG release response with 21.8% to 48.1%—triggered by ADP (0.5–1.5 µM), and with 29.9% to 41.2%—triggered by collagen (0.5–1.25 µg/mL) |
| Human platelets from non-pregnant women, | Taurine | increasing dose (6.25, 25, or 50 mM) |
↓ with 46% to 69.4% (A23187, 1 µM) N outcome (A23187, 1 µM, following 1 mM EDTA addition) | ||
| Miglis, M. et al., 2002 [ | Human platelets, 5 different donors, in vitro | Taurine | increasing dose (5 to 25 mM) | ↓ by 10%, for each T dose (thrombin, 1.0 U/mL) | |
| Human platelets, 5 different donors, in vitro | Taurine | 5 or 25 mM | N outcome for ESC (0.02 mM ADP) | ||
| Human platelets, 5 different donors, in vitro | Taurine | 25 mM | N outcome for MA measured by TEG | ||
| Murina, M.A. et al., 2007 [ | Platelets from healthy donors, in vitro | Taurine | 10 mM | N outcome (ADP, 10 µM) | |
| Platelets from healthy donors, in vitro | Taurine and NaOCl | 10 mM and 1 mM, respectively | ↓ (↑MI by 1.7 times in the mixed treated vs. NaOCl alone group) (ADP, 10 µM) | ||
| Platelets from healthy donors, in vitro | DT | 0.25 mM | ↓ (↑MI to 40 ± 7) (ADP, 10 µM) |
Abbreviations: n—number of subjects per group; ADP—adenosine diphosphate; Ca, Mg-ATPase—calcium, magnesium ATPase; PAt—the amount in µg of agonist required to elicit 10% of a predetermined maximal aggregation in 1 mL PRP; GSH—glutathione; TxB2—thromboxane B2; IDD—insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus; arach. ac—arachidonic acid; ED50—effective dose 50, or the amount of agonist necessary to reach the 50% magnitude of maximal aggregation; PRP—platelet-rich plasma; PPP—platelet-poor plasma; TC—the threshold concentration, or the lowest concentration in µmol/l of ADP required to elicit irreversible aggregation (with a difference of at least 80% in light transmission between PRP and PPP); ATP—adenosine triphosphate; β-TG—β-thromboglobulin; A23187—calcium ionophore; EDTA—ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid; T—taurine; ESC—extent of platelet shape change; MA—maximal clot strength and stability; TEG—thromboelastography; NaOCl—sodium hypochlorite; vs.—versus; MI—magnitude of aggregation inhibition, standardized to control; ↑—up regulation; ↓—down-regulation; N—neutral effect.