| Literature DB >> 35159873 |
Bruno Poletto Rodrigues1, Guilherme Nunes Braga Maurício de Macedo1, Yang Xia1, Andrea Balducci2,3, Lothar Wondraczek1,3.
Abstract
We report on the fabrication and characterization of homogeneous, monophasic sodium metaphosphate and polyethylene glycol hybrid composites achieved via coacervation in aqueous solution. After separation and drying, an amorphous plastic solid is formed, composed mostly of hydrated sodium phosphate moieties amalgamated with polyethylene glycol chains. These composites are largely X-ray amorphous and can contain up to 8 weight percent of polymer. Impedance spectroscopic measurements reveal DC conductivity values of 12 μS/m at room temperature, an enhancement of three orders of magnitude when compared to glassy sodium metaphosphate, and the presence of the polyethylene glycol is reflected in the equivalent circuit and ionic hopping analyses.Entities:
Keywords: composite materials; glasses; ionic conduction; phase separation
Year: 2022 PMID: 35159873 PMCID: PMC8838529 DOI: 10.3390/nano12030528
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Parameters used in the calculation of the static dielectric constants.
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NP |
| 19.72 | 50.4 £ | 11.1 |
| Water | 0.997 † | 18.02 | 80.1 † | 17.69 |
| Ethanol | 0.789 † | 58.39 | 25.3 † | 5.51 |
| EG | 1.106 ‡ | 56.11 | 41.2 ¶ | 9.04 |
| PEG200 | 1.120 § | 178.57 | 22.1 ¶ | 4.79 |
£ Calculated with Equation (3); † Reference [32]; ‡ Reference [33]; ¶ Reference [34]; § Reference [35].
Figure 1Outline of sample preparation: (a) Mixture of the precursor solutions shortly after the onset of coacervation; (b) Mixture of the precursor solutions after phase separation and precipitation for 24 h—the arrows show the boundary between the coacervate and the supernatant; and (c) Diagram of the dried coacervate preparation process.
Figure 2Ternary volume fraction graphs showing the estimated phase separation boundary (as a dashed line) for the sodium metaphosphate precursor solution with addition of water and (a) ethanol, (b) ethylene glycol, and (c) PEG 200.
Figure 3Raman spectra of the dried coacervate and supernatant from the starting glassy and PEG1000. The spectra are shifted vertically for improved readability.
Figure 4Thermogravimetric coupled with mass spectroscopy and differential scanning calorimetry scans of the dried coacervate: (a) TGA with coupled MS curves; and (b) DSC and TGA curves.
Figure 5X-ray diffraction patterns for dried coacervate at different temperatures and associated crystalline phases and database card numbers: (a) Room temperature; (b) 170 °C heat treatment; (c) 300 °C heat treatment; and (d) 550 °C heat treatment.
Figure 6Results from complex impedance characterization of the dried coacervate from 25 to 50 °C: (a) Nyquist plot showing the measured impedance and the fitted R-CPE equivalent circuits in solid lines; (b) Bode plot with calculated DC conductivity from the R-CPE circuits as solid lines and the DC to AC crossover frequencies; and (c) Arrhenius plot of the DC conductivity and crossover frequency. The error bars are smaller than the data point size. Solid lines represent linear fits to the data.
Parameters of the R-CPE equivalent circuits (Resistance R, CPE constant Q, phase ) fitted to the experimental impedance data, circuit DC conductivity , and crossover frequency as a function of temperature.
| Temperature (°C) | R (MΩ) | Q (p |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 | 3.4 ± 0.5 | 60 ± 10 | 0.82 ± 0.01 | 11.90 ± 0.05 | 13.8 |
| 30 | 2.4 ± 0.3 | 100 ± 10 | 0.80 ± 0.01 | 16.83 ± 0.06 | 16.8 |
| 35 | 1.8 ± 0.3 | 110 ± 10 | 0.797 ± 0.009 | 22.82 ± 0.09 | 22.0 |
| 40 | 1.4 ± 0.2 | 120 ± 10 | 0.797 ± 0.007 | 29.2 ± 0.1 | 27.1 |
| 45 | 1.1 ± 0.2 | 140 ± 10 | 0.799 ± 0.006 | 36.9 ± 0.1 | 33.1 |
| 50 | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 140 ± 10 | 0.804 ± 0.006 | 46.4 ± 0.1 | 41.1 |