| Literature DB >> 24045415 |
David M Pickup1, Robert J Newport, Emma R Barney, Ji-Yung Kim, Sabeel P Valappil, Jonathan C Knowles.
Abstract
In this study, amorphous (Na2O)x(CaO)0.50- x(P2O5)0.50·yH2O (where x = ~0.15 and y = ~3) samples were prepared by a coacervate method. Thermal analysis showed that two types of water molecules were present in the coacervate structures: one type loosely bound and the other part of the phosphate structure. Structural studies using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and X-ray total diffraction revealed the samples to have very similar structures to melt-quenched glasses of comparable composition. Furthermore, no significant structural differences were observed between samples prepared using calcium nitrate as the calcium source or those prepared from calcium chloride. A sample containing ~1 mol% Ag2O was prepared to test the hypothesis that calcium phosphate coacervate materials could be used as delivery agents for antibacterial ions. This sample exhibited significant antibacterial activity against the bacterium Psuedomonas aeruginosa. FTIR data revealed the silver-doped sample to be structurally akin to the analogous silver-free sample.Entities:
Keywords: Coacervates; FTIR; X-ray total diffraction; antibacterial; biomaterials; phosphate glasses
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24045415 PMCID: PMC4107827 DOI: 10.1177/0885328213502586
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Biomater Appl ISSN: 0885-3282 Impact factor: 2.646
Figure
1.General schematic for the preparation of coacervate derived phosphate glasses.
Sample characterisation.
| Sample | Composition (wt%) | Density (g cm−3) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| O | Na | P | Ca | ||
| COA1 | 64.54 ± 1.07 | 5.04 ± 0.37 | 20.37 ± 0.56 | 10.05 ± 0.50 | 2.326 ± 0.010 |
| COA2 | 64.95 ± 0.74 | 5.68 ± 0.34 | 19.90 ± 0.41 | 9.48 ± 0.24 | 2.281 ± 0.010 |
Sample compositions expressed in terms of simple oxides.
| Sample | Composition (mol%) | Composition (wt%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Na2O | CaO | P2O5 | H2O | Na2O | CaO | P2O5 | H2O | |
| COA1 | 4.03 ± 0.30 | 9.24 ± 0.46 | 12.08 ± 0.33 | 74.65 ± 0.65 | 6.52 ± 0.48 | 13.54 ± 0.67 | 44.80 ± 1.23 | 34.14 ± 0.58 |
| COA2 | 4.45 ± 0.27 | 8.54 ± 0.22 | 11.56 ± 0.24 | 75.45 ± 0.46 | 7.34 ± 0.44 | 12.75 ± 0.32 | 43.71 ± 0.90 | 36.20 ± 0.41 |
Figure
2.Simultaneous TGA (dashed lines) and DTA (solid lines) measurements from the coacervate samples: (a) COA1 and (b) COA2.
Figure 3.FTIR spectra from undoped (COA1) and silver-doped (COA3) coacervate samples compared with those from melt-quenched metaphosphate glasses. The upper three curves have been off-set for clarity. Mixed Ca/Na MPG refers to (CaO)0.4(Na2O)0.1(P2O5)0.5 metaphosphate glass.
Figure 4.X-ray total diffraction data from the COA1 coacervate sample: (a) Q-space interference function and (b) real-space pair-distribution function (solid line) together with its simulation (dashed line).
Figure 5.X-ray total diffraction data from the COA2 coacervate sample: (a) Q-space interference function and (b) real-space pair-distribution function (solid line) together with its simulation (dashed line).
Structural parameters obtained from the fitting of the XRTD data.[a]
| Sample | Correlation | c.n. | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COA1 | P–NBO | 1.51 | 2.3 | 0.03 |
| P–BO | 1.59 | 1.8 | 0.04 | |
| M–O | 2.38 | 3.6 | 0.08 | |
| O–O | 2.54 | 3.5 | 0.11 | |
| M–P | 2.89 | 2.2 | 0.07 | |
| P–P | 2.97 | 1.9 | 0.09 | |
| COA2 | P–NBO | 1.52 | 2.3 | 0.03 |
| P–BO | 1.58 | 1.8 | 0.03 | |
| M–O | 2.39 | 3.5 | 0.06 | |
| O–O | 2.54 | 3.4 | 0.11 | |
| M–P | 2.89 | 2.3 | 0.07 | |
| P–P | 2.98 | 1.8 | 0.10 |
R is the atomic separation, c.n. the coordination number and σ the disorder parameter. M denotes the generic metal cation, BO is a bridging oxygen and NBO is a non-bridging oxygen. The errors are reasonably estimated as ±0.02 Å in R, ±15% in N and ±0.01 Å in σ.