| Literature DB >> 35159322 |
Jennia Michaeli1,2, Riham Smoom2, Noa Serruya2, Hosniyah El Ayoubi2, Keren Rotshenker-Olshinka1, Naama Srebnik1, Ofir Michaeli2, Talia Eldar-Geva1, Yehuda Tzfati2.
Abstract
Current social trends of delayed reproduction to the fourth and fifth decade of life call for a better understanding of reproductive aging. Demographic studies correlated late reproduction with general health and longevity. Telomeres, the protective ends of eukaryotic chromosomes, were implicated in various aging-associated pathologies and longevity. To examine whether telomeres are also associated with reproductive aging, we measured by Southern analysis the terminal restriction fragments (TRF) in leukocytes of women delivering a healthy infant following a spontaneous pregnancy at 43-48 years of age. We compared them to age-matched previously fertile women who failed to conceive above age 41. The average TRF length in the extended fertility group (9350 bp) was significantly longer than in the normal fertility group (8850 bp; p-value = 0.03). Strikingly, excluding women with nine or more children increased the difference between the groups to over 1000 bp (9920 and 8880 bp; p-value = 0.0009). Nevertheless, we observed no apparent effects of pregnancy, delivery, or parity on telomere length. We propose that longer leukocyte telomere length reflects higher oocyte quality, which can compensate for other limiting physiological and behavioral factors and enable successful reproduction. Leukocyte telomere length should be further explored as a novel biomarker of oocyte quality for assessing reproductive potential and integrating family planning with demanding women's careers.Entities:
Keywords: female fertility; longevity; reproductive aging; telomeres
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35159322 PMCID: PMC8834216 DOI: 10.3390/cells11030513
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cells ISSN: 2073-4409 Impact factor: 6.600
Demographic characteristics of EF and NF study groups.
| Case | Control | |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years), mean ± SD | 44.23 ± 1.40 | 44.9 ± 1.35 |
| Gravida, mean ± SD | 11.63 ± 5.03 | 7.5 ± 4.09 |
| Para, mean ± SD | 9.37 ± 3.83 | 5.7 ± 3.27 |
| Miscarriages, mean ± SD | 2.27 ± 1.93 | 1.77 ± 1.84 |
| Living children, mean ± SD | 9.4 ± 3.89 | 5.83 ± 3.25 |
| Menarche (years), mean ± SD | 13.14 ± 1.68 | 13.28 ± 1.41 |
| Mother’s age at last child (years), mean ± SD | 37.19 ± 5.56 | 36.93 ± 5.58 |
| Sister’s age at last child (years), mean ± SD * | 41.18 ± 2.32 | 38.87 ± 4.14 |
* For case study group n = 17, control study group n = 15, as some participants do not have sisters or sisters that are still in childbearing ages.
Figure 1Women with extended fertility have longer telomeres. (A) A representative image of a Southern blot hybridized with a telomeric probe. Blood samples were collected from the Extended Fertility (EF) group participants (blue) within 48 h after delivery and the Normal Fertility (NF) group participants at recruitment (orange), and their leukocyte telomere length was analyzed as described under ‘Materials and Methods’. The mean telomere terminal restriction fragment (TRF) length, as calculated by TeloTool, is depicted below each lane. (B) Mean TRF in the NF and EF groups measured in three separate non-redundant gels shown in (A) and in the Supplementary Figure S1. Note that in (A), one of the women sampled as NF (indicated by an asterisk) later conceived and delivered a healthy child, thus reclassified as EF. (C) Mean TRF length reproducibly measured in several different gels for each participant, averaged, and presented for all the participants of the EF versus NF groups. p-value = 0.03 (*). Indicated are average and SD. (D) Mean telomere length is presented for a subgroup of participants with up to eight children in the EF and NF groups. p-value = 0.0009 (**). Indicated are average and SD. The graph for the subgroup of women with 9 or more children is shown in Supplementary Figure S3.
Figure 2No apparent association of childbearing and childcaring with telomere length. (A) Leukocyte telomere length for each of the participants of the EF group was measured within 48 h of delivery (‘0’) and again five to six months later (‘6’). (B) Graph showing the mean TRF values for each participant, at delivery (light blue) and six months postpartum (dark blue). p-value = ns. (C) Graph showing mean TRF length measured in primiparous (first delivery, green) versus grand-multiparous (≥6 deliveries, purple). p-value = ns. The Southern images are shown in Supplementary Figure S2.
Demographic characteristics of primipara and grandmultipara study groups.
| Primipara | Grandmultipara | |
|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | |
| Age (years), mean ± SD | 31.47 ± 1.33 | 32.95 ± 1.24 |
| Gravida, mean ± SD | 1.29 ± 0.75 | 8.30 ± 1.55 |
| Para, mean ± SD | 1 | 7.45 ± 1.32 |
| Miscarriages, mean ± SD | 0.29 ± 0.75 | 0.85 ± 1.11 |
| Living children, mean ± SD | 1 | 7.40 ± 1.36 |
| Menarche (years), mean ± SD | 13.71 ± 1.52 | 12.90 ± 0.85 |
| Mother’s age at last child (years), mean ± SD | 34.69 ± 5.11 | 39.15 ± 4.38 |
Figure 3A working model for extended fertility. Female fertility at an advanced age is determined by a combination of factors: the quality of the oocytes (represented by telomere length), the oocyte quantity (represented by AMH levels or Antral Follicle Count), and male and physiological–behavioral characteristics (represented by sperm count, proper timing of intercourse, demonstration of normal female anatomy, etc.). While low AMH levels are permissive to extended fertility, oocyte quality and physiological and behavioral factors may be limiting and compensating for each other.