Laura Shepherd1, Anna Turner1, Darren P Reynolds1, Andrew R Thompson2. 1. Department of Clinical Psychology & Neuropsychology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Queens Medical Centre Campus, Nottingham, UK. 2. South Wales Clinical Psychology Training Programme, School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, UK.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Due to scarring, appearance anxiety is a common psychological difficulty in patients accessing burns services. Appearance anxiety can significantly impact upon social functioning and quality of life; thus, the availability of effective psychological therapies is vital. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) is considered useful for treating distress associated with other health conditions and may lend itself well to appearance anxiety. However, no published research is currently available. METHODS: Three single case studies (two male burns patients; one female necrotising fasciitis patient) are presented where appearance anxiety was treated using ACT. A treatment protocol was followed and evaluated: the Derriford Appearance Scale measured appearance anxiety; the Work and Social Adjustment Scale measured impairment in functioning; the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire measured acceptance (willingness to open up to distressing internal experiences); and the Committed Action Questionnaire measured engagement in meaningful and valued life activities. Measures were given at every treatment session and patient feedback was obtained. One-month follow-up data were available for two cases. RESULTS: After the intervention, all patients had reduced functional impairment and were living more valued and meaningful lives. No negative effects were found. DISCUSSION: These case studies suggest that ACT may be a useful psychological therapy for appearance anxiety. The uncontrolled nature of the intervention limits the conclusions that can be drawn. CONCLUSION: A pilot feasibility study to evaluate the effectiveness of ACT for appearance anxiety is warranted. LAY SUMMARY: Many patients with scars can feel distressed about their appearance. This is known as appearance anxiety and can include patients accessing burns services. Appearance anxiety can stop patients from enjoying a good quality of life and impact upon important areas of daily functioning. It is therefore important that psychological therapies are effective. However, research investigating the effectiveness of psychological therapies is limited. This paper describes the psychological therapy of three patients who were distressed about scarring. A psychological therapy called Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) was used as part of standard care and evaluated using questionnaires and patient feedback. After the course of ACT, all patients were less impacted day-to-day by their appearance anxiety and were living more valued and meaningful lives. No negative effects were found. These case studies suggest that ACT may be a useful psychological therapy for appearance anxiety and further research evaluating it should be completed.
INTRODUCTION: Due to scarring, appearance anxiety is a common psychological difficulty in patients accessing burns services. Appearance anxiety can significantly impact upon social functioning and quality of life; thus, the availability of effective psychological therapies is vital. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) is considered useful for treating distress associated with other health conditions and may lend itself well to appearance anxiety. However, no published research is currently available. METHODS: Three single case studies (two male burns patients; one female necrotising fasciitis patient) are presented where appearance anxiety was treated using ACT. A treatment protocol was followed and evaluated: the Derriford Appearance Scale measured appearance anxiety; the Work and Social Adjustment Scale measured impairment in functioning; the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire measured acceptance (willingness to open up to distressing internal experiences); and the Committed Action Questionnaire measured engagement in meaningful and valued life activities. Measures were given at every treatment session and patient feedback was obtained. One-month follow-up data were available for two cases. RESULTS: After the intervention, all patients had reduced functional impairment and were living more valued and meaningful lives. No negative effects were found. DISCUSSION: These case studies suggest that ACT may be a useful psychological therapy for appearance anxiety. The uncontrolled nature of the intervention limits the conclusions that can be drawn. CONCLUSION: A pilot feasibility study to evaluate the effectiveness of ACT for appearance anxiety is warranted. LAY SUMMARY: Many patients with scars can feel distressed about their appearance. This is known as appearance anxiety and can include patients accessing burns services. Appearance anxiety can stop patients from enjoying a good quality of life and impact upon important areas of daily functioning. It is therefore important that psychological therapies are effective. However, research investigating the effectiveness of psychological therapies is limited. This paper describes the psychological therapy of three patients who were distressed about scarring. A psychological therapy called Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) was used as part of standard care and evaluated using questionnaires and patient feedback. After the course of ACT, all patients were less impacted day-to-day by their appearance anxiety and were living more valued and meaningful lives. No negative effects were found. These case studies suggest that ACT may be a useful psychological therapy for appearance anxiety and further research evaluating it should be completed.
People with visible differences, whose appearance is considered different compared to
the culturally defined ‘norm,’ can experience psychological distress[1-3] and receive negative social
responses from others, including stares and unsolicited questions.
Appearance anxiety (distress related to appearance) is a common difficulty
affecting those with visible differences,[5,6] including the burns
population.[7,8]
Appearance anxiety falls on a continuum of distress and can negatively affect
social, occupational and relational functioning.[9,10] Effective psychological
therapies to reduce appearance anxiety are therefore vital.Several studies have highlighted unhelpful cognitive and behavioural factors in the
maintenance of appearance anxiety, including negative beliefs about the value and
acceptability of appearance, social comparisons, self-focused attention and
avoidance behaviour.[5,11,12] As a consequence, cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT), which aims
to reduce unhelpful cognitive and behavioural factors, has been a common therapeutic approach.
However, there is a lack of high-quality studies investigating the
effectiveness of CBT, or indeed any other psychological therapy, for appearance
anxiety associated with a visible difference.[14,15]More recently, three studies have highlighted the potential importance of other
psychological factors such as mindfulness (the ability to be in the present
moment),[16,17] acceptance (willingness to experience internal experiences,
including distress),[17,18] cognitive defusion (standing back from thoughts)
and committed action (doing what matters despite distress)
in reduced appearance anxiety. These are all elements of ‘psychological
flexibility’, which underpins a newer form of CBT that incorporates mindfulness and
acceptance, called Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT).
ACT typically teaches people the following: to be more accepting of (willing
to feel) distressing internal experiences (such as emotions, thoughts or
physiological sensations); to stand back or get some distance from thoughts that get
in the way of people doing what matters to them; and to be in the present moment,
rather than caught up in the past or the future. The overall aim of ACT is not to
reduce psychological distress per se, but rather to help people live with their
distressing experiences so that they can choose to behave in ways that enable them
to live their life more meaningfully. There is increasing evidence that ACT is
effective in reducing psychological difficulties such as anxiety and depression, as
well as reducing distress associated with chronic health problems.
Improvements have been reported after individual and group therapy of 6–12
sessions in patients across a variety of chronic physical health conditions,
late-stage cancer and chronic pain,[21-23] and one-day workshops
targeting obesity-related distress and diabetes self-management.[24,25] However, there
is no published research exploring the effectiveness of ACT for appearance anxiety
despite this being viewed as potentially well-suited.
Published clinical case studies are useful in exploring whether a
psychological therapy is helpful to patients in real-life clinical settings and can
help inform whether conducting further controlled studies is warranted. The current
paper presents the use of ACT with three patients with appearance anxiety associated
with scarring.
Methods
Participants
Three patients from a UK burns service were referred to the affiliated clinical
psychology service as part of standard care. Patients received usual clinical
care and provided informed written consent to the anonymised dissemination of
their therapy. All patients were experiencing appearance anxiety, determined
through a clinical interview by one of the treating clinical psychologists
(authors LS and AT) and completion of the Derriford Appearance Scale (DAS-24).
Case 1: ‘Adam’
Adam was a 21-year-old white British man with a 2% total body surface area
(TBSA) full-thickness flame burn to his hand following a workplace accident
six months before the intervention. He was employed full-time and was living
with his partner at the time of the accident. After the accident, Adam
developed post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), which had been treated
successfully through trauma-focused psychological therapy by the second
author (AT). In addition, Adam developed appearance anxiety due to scarring,
and treatment for this began after his symptoms of PTSD had reduced to
subclinical levels, as determined by the treating clinical psychologist (AT)
and his self-report. He did not have a history of psychological problems
before the accident but he reported that he had always had a degree of poor
body image but that this had never impacted on his daily functioning. He
worried about how others would perceive his hand, covered his scars, avoided
holding hands with his partner and withdrew socially. This negatively
impacted his relationship and social life. Adam received eight sessions of
ACT. He cancelled and rearranged four sessions and had no
non-attendances.
Case 2: ‘Paul’
Paul was a 26-year-old white British man who sustained 8% TBSA mixed-depth
burns to his face and hands during a workplace welding accident 13 months
before the intervention. He had been working full-time in the welding
industry before the accident and lived with his partner and pre-school
daughter. He had no history of psychological difficulties. After the
accident, Paul developed PTSD, which had been treated successfully through
trauma-focused psychological therapy by the second author (AT). Before the
intervention for his appearance anxiety, Paul’s symptoms of PTSD were in the
subclinical range and not impacting upon any area of his life. Paul
experienced appearance anxiety associated with scarring on his hands and
pigmentation changes to his face. He was troubled by thoughts about others
judging him negatively and worried others would ask questions and that he
would not be able to manage social exchanges. He spent excessive amounts of
time checking and concealing his scarring by clothing, gloves and make-up.
He was isolating himself, avoiding public places and had stopped doing
meaningful activities with his young daughter, such as taking her to
nursery, swimming and dance lessons. Paul received nine sessions of ACT. He
cancelled and rearranged four sessions and had no non-attendances.
Case 3: ‘Jessica’
Jessica was a 39-year-old white British woman who developed necrotising
fasciitis five months before the intervention. Before being hospitalised,
she was working part-time and living with her partner and three school-aged
children. She had a history of postnatal depression but was not depressed at
the time of her illness. The necrotising fasciitis left significant scarring
and contour changes to her leg. Jessica had appearance anxiety related to
the shape of her leg and was spending excessive amounts of time attempting
to make her legs look more symmetrical, using bandages. She was avoiding
wearing tight clothing and swimming (her former hobby). She felt
self-conscious when in public places and was overwhelmed by thoughts about
what other people would think about her leg. She also felt burdened by scar
management procedures. Jessica received six sessions of ACT. She cancelled
and rearranged one session and had no non-attendances. Jessica also
developed PTSD associated with her experience of being rushed to hospital,
developing sepsis and undergoing emergency surgery. This was treated using
trauma-focused psychological therapy after the detailed intervention for her
appearance anxiety by the first author (LS), in line with Jessica’s main
concern, which was her appearance anxiety.
Procedure
As part of routine care, patients were assessed to determine suitability for
psychological therapy by the treating clinical psychologists (authors LS and
AT). Patients were deemed appropriate for therapy if the treating psychologists
believed that they were able to appropriately engage, there were no concerns
about suicidal risk or risk to others, there was no other mental health problems
that required urgent or mental healthcare, and if patients stated that they
wanted therapy to manage their appearance anxiety. In the period of treating the
three cases presented, three additional patients were assessed and deemed
suitable for the intervention. They were offered the intervention but declined
any form of psychological therapy.
ACT intervention
In the absence of empirically supported ACT treatment protocols for appearance
anxiety, an ACT protocol had been developed by the first and second authors (LS
and AT) who specialise in treating psychological difficulties due to visible
differences and are highly trained in ACT. Therapy sessions were 60 min long,
usually delivered weekly and involved giving between-sessions tasks. Therapy
sessions were delivered in person by the treating psychologists (LS and AT) at
the hospital where the patients had received their medical care from the burns
service. Therapy ended when patients reported that they had achieved their
therapy goals and/or felt able to manage any residual distress independently,
through clinical conversations with the treating clinical psychologists (LS and
AT). The full clinical protocol is available from the corresponding author but
is summarised as follows:Session 1: Introducing ACT; Recognising that current ways of managing
appearance anxiety are not working; Introducing the idea of willingness
to feel anxiety and learning to live with it (acceptance);Session 2: Identifying what matters/values; Mindfulness exercise; Further
introduction to acceptance using the ‘passengers on the bus’ exercise
;Session 3: Developing acceptance through metaphors, scaling and teaching
acceptance techniques; Identifying a first behavioural step to living
life according to values; Experiential acceptance exercise
;Session 4: Techniques to aid standing back from difficult thoughts about
appearance and others’ reactions (cognitive defusion)
;Session 5: Developing a stepped plan of behavioural changes patients
would like to make in line with values; Reinforcement of acceptance and
cognitive defusion techniques; Experiential acceptance exercise
;Session 6: Review of behavioural changes made; Trouble-shooting
difficulties by reinforcing acceptance and cognitive defusion
techniques; Introducing the idea of being distinct from thoughts and
feelings; Mindfulness exercise;Session 7: Review of behavioural change and trouble-shooting difficulties
by reinforcing acceptance and defusion techniques; Mindfulness exercise;
Developing awareness of being in the present moment;Session 8 onwards: Review of behavioural changes made; Trouble-shooting
difficulties by reinforcing acceptance and cognitive defusion
techniques; Advanced troubleshooting exercises as required.
Measures
Patients were asked to complete four outcome measures, using paper
questionnaires, at baseline (while on the waiting list for the service), as part
of an initial clinical assessment by the clinical psychologist, after every
treatment session, and at the one-month follow-up. Only one patient completed
the outcome measures at baseline. All patients completed the measures during the
assessment. Patients were asked to complete the measures after treatment
sessions at home and return them at their next session, and data was collected
after the majority of sessions. Follow-up data was available for two patients as
one patient moved out of the area and did not respond to follow-up attempts by
telephone.The DAS-24
was used to measure appearance anxiety. It consists of 24 items measuring
distress associated with appearance (e.g. ‘How rejected do you feel?’ and ‘I
avoid communal changing rooms’). Total scores were in the range of 10–96, where
higher scores denote increased distress. Norms are available for general and
clinical populations but there is no clinical cut-off score as distress is
conceptualised on a continuum. This measure is commonly used in appearance
research and was used in a previous study exploring the relationship between
appearance anxiety and psychological flexibility after burns.The Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS)
was used to measure impairment in functioning (e.g. ‘Because of the way I
feel, my social leisure activities involving other people, such as parties,
outings, visits, dating, home entertainment, cinema, are impaired’). It consists
of five items and total scores are in the range of 0–40, with higher scores
indicating increased impairment. Scores in the range of 1–10 indicate ‘Mild’
functional impairment, scores of 11–20 suggest ‘Moderate’ functional impairment
and scores ⩾ 21 indicate ‘Severe’ functional impairment. This measure is
commonly used in clinical settings to determine functional impairment and change
after treatment.The Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ-II)
was used to measure acceptance (e.g. ‘I’m afraid of my feelings’). It has
seven items, the total score is in the range of 7–49, and lower scores indicate
greater acceptance. Scores of ⩾ 24 suggest probable clinical distress. This is a
widely used measure of psychological flexibility and has been used in previous
research after burns.The Committed Action Questionnaire (CAQ-8)
was used to measure valued action/doing what matters. The scale contains
eight items (e.g. ‘If I feel distressed or discouraged, I let my commitments
slide’) and higher scores indicate increased valued living. Total scores are in
the range of 0–48 and no norms are available. It has been previously used in
research exploring psychological flexibility in burns patients.
Results
Adam
Figure 1 illustrates that
during therapy Adam gradually began living a more valued life (CAQ-8 score
increased from 28 to 40). He developed new social interests and gradually
started attending social events that he had been avoiding and taking more
opportunities at work. Adam continued to dislike the appearance of his scar,
experience anxiety about others’ reactions to it and avoid holding hands with
his partner (evidenced by a similar DAS-24 score of 46 before therapy and 45
after therapy). However, during therapy his willingness to experience his
anxiety (acceptance) increased (AAQ-II score decreased from 20 to 14). He learnt
ways to live with his anxiety and stand back from unhelpful thoughts so they had
less impact on his functioning (WSAS score decreased from 11 to 5). At the end
of therapy, Adam felt happier, more confident and motivated, and had increased
self-esteem, using the patient’s self-report as well as behavioural observations
by the treating clinical psychologist (author AT). He reported feeling confident
in utilising skills learnt during therapy to independently work towards allowing
his partner to hold his hand/touch his scar. As previously detailed, no
follow-up data were available on Adam due to him moving out of the area and not
responding to telephone follow-up attempts.
Figure 2 shows Paul’s
reduced appearance anxiety during therapy (DAS-24 score reduced from 74 to 48).
By the end of therapy, his anxiety was having less impact on his functioning
(WSAS score reduced from 27 to 8) and he gradually started living his life more
in line with his values (CAQ-8 score increased from 21 to 37). During therapy,
he learnt to be willing to experience anxiety (AAQ-II score reduced from 36 to
19) and how to better manage his unhelpful thoughts about his scar and other
people’s judgements and reactions. By the end of therapy, he had returned to
socialising with friends and taking his daughter to nursery, swimming and dance
lessons. He was living according to his values of being a present father and
focused on relationships with others. Gains were sustained at the one-month
follow-up.
Figure 3 demonstrates
Jessica’s reduction in appearance anxiety (DAS-24 score reduced from 43 to 28)
during therapy. She became more willing to experience anxiety and
self-consciousness when in public (AAQ-II score reduced from 29 to 23) and
learnt how to manage distressing thoughts about the appearance of her leg. By
the end of therapy, the impact of her appearance anxiety on her functioning had
reduced (WSAS score reduced from 16 to 2) and she was living a more valued life
(CAQ-8 score increased from 32 to 34). She was no longer making attempts to make
her legs look more symmetrical using bandages, was wearing tight clothing when
she wanted to and had returned to swimming. She also no longer felt burdened by
scar management procedures and was doing these routinely. Gains were sustained
at the one-month follow-up.
These three case studies illustrate the possible effectiveness of ACT for patients
experiencing appearance anxiety. By the end of the intervention, all patients had
reduced functional impairment and were living more valued and meaningful lives. No
negative effects were found. A reduction in appearance anxiety was observed in two
cases. In the other case, appearance anxiety remained at a similar level throughout
therapy, but gains were made in valued living and functioning. This is in line with
the nature of ACT, which does not aim to reduce distress but rather improve a
person’s ability to live meaningfully with distress.
These cases, treated by ACT to increase psychological flexibility, may
support recent research that has suggested a role of reduced psychological
flexibility in appearance anxiety.[16-18] It also adds to the growing
body of evidence suggesting that ACT may be effective in managing distress related
to physical health problems.[20-25]Given the small number of case studies presented, the results should be treated with
some caution. The single case experimental design was not adhered to and the case
studies relied on nomothetic measures (questionnaires). As such, future case studies
should be conducted using idiographic and patient-specific outcome measures, which
would enable detailed analysis of change to be investigated. The current findings
are also limited by the uncontrolled nature of the intervention; it is important to
acknowledge that the improvements observed in the cases may have been due to other
factors that were not measured. In addition, baseline and follow-up data were also
not available for all cases, which would have strengthened the results. Furthermore,
there are limitations of the WSAS, used to measure functional impairment. This is a
brief measure and does not capture all relevant domains that can be affected by
appearance anxiety, such as sexual relationships and clothing choices. Finally,
clinical experience of the authors suggests that ACT is not effective for some
patients experiencing appearance anxiety, and this is typically when patients are
not ready to engage in behavioural change and/or are not open to the concept of
being willing to feel uncomfortable or distressing emotions. Indeed, readiness is
key for engaging in all types of psychological therapy and avoidance (related to
emotions, feelings or behaviour) can be a barrier. These aspects need to be explored
during clinical assessments and throughout therapy.
Conclusion
The cases presented provide preliminary support for the notion that ACT may be
well-suited to some patients with visible differences who are experiencing
appearance anxiety and are ready to engage with the concept of reducing their
emotional and behavioural avoidance. This readiness can be routinely assessed and
ACT provided by clinical psychologists. The ACT intervention did not appear to have
any negative effects in the three cases presented. Our study also provides a
rationale for conducting a feasibility pilot study to evaluate the effectiveness of
ACT for appearance anxiety.
Authors: Frank W Bond; Steven C Hayes; Ruth A Baer; Kenneth M Carpenter; Nigel Guenole; Holly K Orcutt; Tom Waltz; Robert D Zettle Journal: Behav Ther Date: 2011-05-25
Authors: R K Wicksell; M Kemani; K Jensen; E Kosek; D Kadetoff; K Sorjonen; M Ingvar; G L Olsson Journal: Eur J Pain Date: 2012-10-23 Impact factor: 3.931
Authors: John A G Gibson; Edward Ackling; Jonathan I Bisson; Thomas D Dobbs; Iain S Whitaker Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2018-06-20 Impact factor: 4.839