Literature DB >> 15969855

The DAS24: a short form of the Derriford Appearance Scale DAS59 to measure individual responses to living with problems of appearance.

Tony Carr1, Timothy Moss, David Harris.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To develop a psychometrically robust and widely applicable short form of the Derriford Appearance Scale, (DAS59), which (1) will reliably and validly assess the distress and difficulties experienced in living with problems of appearance, (2) is acceptable to clinical and non-clinical populations, and (3) facilitates research and clinical decision-making through good standardization and sensitivity.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey designs using clinical (out-patient and in-patient) and general population samples.
METHOD: Twenty-five items were selected initially from the 59 items of the original DAS59. These were refined to 24 through item analyses and the scale was standardized on 535 patients with a range of problems of appearance and on a representative general population sample (N=1, 107).
RESULTS: All 24 items contributed well to the total score and internal consistency was high (alpha=.92). Test-retest reliability (6 months) was good (0.82), and criterion validity, with the DAS59, was excellent (0.88). Good construct validity was demonstrated in differences between (1) patient and general population samples, (2) members of the general population concerned and not concerned about their appearance, and (3) in patterns of convergent and divergent correlations with a range of established scales. The general population data revealed widespread concerns about appearance.
CONCLUSION: The DAS24 provides a widely applicable and acceptable short form of the original DAS59. It is psychometrically robust and discriminates well between patient groups, between clinical and non-clinical populations, and within the general population between those concerned, and those not concerned, about their appearance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15969855     DOI: 10.1348/135910705X27613

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Health Psychol        ISSN: 1359-107X


  42 in total

1.  Use of the Derriford Appearance Scale 59 to assess patient-reported outcomes in secondary cleft surgery.

Authors:  Sophie Ricketts; Eran Regev; Oleh M Antonyshyn; Alex Kiss; Jeffrey A Fialkov
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 0.947

2.  A Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Assessing Body Image Disturbance in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  Mark A Ellis; Katherine R Sterba; Emily A Brennan; Stacey Maurer; Elizabeth G Hill; Terry A Day; Evan M Graboyes
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 3.497

3.  Simultaneous maxillomandibular distraction osteogenesis in hemifacial microsomia: Report of 7 cases.

Authors:  Divya Mehrotra; Debraj Howladar; Dichen P Bhutia
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2017-05-07

4.  Which factors are associated with quality of life in patients with Graves' orbitopathy presenting for orbital decompression surgery?

Authors:  S Wickwar; H B McBain; D G Ezra; S P Hirani; G E Rose; S P Newman
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  The psychological well-being and appearance concerns of patients presenting with ptosis.

Authors:  H S Richards; E Jenkinson; N Rumsey; P White; H Garrott; H Herbert; F Kalapesi; R A Harrad
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  A systematic review of body image measures for people diagnosed with head and neck cancer (HNC).

Authors:  Chindhu Shunmuga Sundaram; Haryana M Dhillon; Phyllis N Butow; Puma Sundaresan; Claudia Rutherford
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-06-15       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  The psychosocial benefits of corrective surgery for adults with strabismus.

Authors:  S Jackson; R A Harrad; M Morris; N Rumsey
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 8.  Body image in cancer survivors: a systematic review of case-control studies.

Authors:  Vicky Lehmann; Mariët Hagedoorn; Marrit A Tuinman
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 4.442

9.  Post-traumatic stress in head and neck cancer survivors and their partners.

Authors:  Elisavet Moschopoulou; Iain Hutchison; Kamaldeep Bhui; Ania Korszun
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Latent structure and reliability analysis of the measure of body apperception: cross-validation for head and neck cancer patients.

Authors:  Pascal Jean-Pierre; Christopher Fundakowski; Enrique Perez; Shadae E Jean-Pierre; Ashley R Jean-Pierre; Angelica B Melillo; Rachel Libby; Zoukaa Sargi
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-08-12       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.