OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of 2 instructions on the same walking while talking (WWT) task on task prioritization by nondisabled subjects. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey with within subject comparisons. SETTING: Community-based sample. PARTICIPANTS: Older adults (N=189; mean age, 80.2+/-4.9y), who did not meet criteria from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, Fourth Edition, for dementia and were able to independently perform activities of daily living. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Verbal and gait measures on the same WWT task with 2 different instructions: paying attention to both talking and walking (WWT-C) and paying attention only to talking (WWT-T). RESULTS: Task prioritization effects were seen on walking but not on talking. Compared with their baseline normal walking velocity (without talking), subjects slowed down more on WWT-T (median change, 28.3%) than WWT-C (median change, 26.4%). Comparing the 2 WWT conditions, velocity and cadence was slower during WWT-T compared with WWT-C, with longer stride length. Verbal output was not significantly different on the 2 conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Changing instructions while maintaining the same cognitive and motor tasks on WWT in older adults result in task prioritization effects.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of 2 instructions on the same walking while talking (WWT) task on task prioritization by nondisabled subjects. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey with within subject comparisons. SETTING: Community-based sample. PARTICIPANTS: Older adults (N=189; mean age, 80.2+/-4.9y), who did not meet criteria from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, Fourth Edition, for dementia and were able to independently perform activities of daily living. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Verbal and gait measures on the same WWT task with 2 different instructions: paying attention to both talking and walking (WWT-C) and paying attention only to talking (WWT-T). RESULTS: Task prioritization effects were seen on walking but not on talking. Compared with their baseline normal walking velocity (without talking), subjects slowed down more on WWT-T (median change, 28.3%) than WWT-C (median change, 26.4%). Comparing the 2 WWT conditions, velocity and cadence was slower during WWT-T compared with WWT-C, with longer stride length. Verbal output was not significantly different on the 2 conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Changing instructions while maintaining the same cognitive and motor tasks on WWT in older adults result in task prioritization effects.
Authors: Joe Verghese; Herman Buschke; Lisa Viola; Mindy Katz; Charles Hall; Gail Kuslansky; Richard Lipton Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: C C Persad; B Giordani; H C Chen; J A Ashton-Miller; N B Alexander; C S Wilson; S Berent; K Guire; A B Schultz Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 1995-09 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: Richard B Lipton; Mindy J Katz; Gail Kuslansky; Martin J Sliwinski; Walter F Stewart; Joe Verghese; Howard A Crystal; Herman Buschke Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Annetje Bootsma-van der Wiel; Jacobijn Gussekloo; Anton J M de Craen; Eric van Exel; Bastiaan R Bloem; Rudi G J Westendorp Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Esther W de Hoon; John H Allum; Mark G Carpenter; Christian Salis; Bastiaan R Bloem; Martin Conzelmann; Heike A Bischoff Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Manuel Montero-Odasso; Howard Bergman; Natalie A Phillips; Chek H Wong; Nadia Sourial; Howard Chertkow Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2009-09-01 Impact factor: 3.921