Literature DB >> 3515257

Comparison of fetal weight estimation formulas with and without head measurements.

S L Warsof, P Wolf, J Coulehan, J T Queenan.   

Abstract

Most published sonographic techniques for estimating fetal weight use measurements of the biparietal diameter (BPD) and abdominal circumference. In many clinical situations, however, accurate head measurements cannot be obtained. One hundred one patients were scanned within 72 hours of delivery. Using multiple stepwise regression analysis, a best-fit formula was developed using abdominal circumference and femur length, or femur length alone. The mean error was 109 g/kg fetal weight for abdominal circumference and femur length that was comparable with BPD and abdominal circumference formulas for estimated fetal weight. The mean error when femur length was used alone was 129 g/kg fetal weight. When these models were tested prospectively on 67 patients and compared with published formulas, they yielded results that were similar in accuracy. Among these additional patients, the model using one parameter (femur length) had an average error of 114 g/kg, whereas the femur length and abdominal circumference showed a mean error of 125 g/kg.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3515257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  8 in total

1.  Fetal ultrasound image segmentation system and its use in fetal weight estimation.

Authors:  Jinhua Yu; Yuanyuan Wang; Ping Chen
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2008-10-11       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  The accuracy of ultrasound estimation of fetal weight in comparison to birth weight: A systematic review.

Authors:  Julia Milner; Jane Arezina
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2018-02-07

3.  Different formulas, different thresholds and different performance-the prediction of macrosomia by ultrasound.

Authors:  A Aviram; Y Yogev; E Ashwal; L Hiersch; D Danon; E Hadar; R Gabbay-Benziv
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 2.521

4.  Ultrasonography-based Fetal Weight Estimation: Finding an Appropriate Model for an Indian Population.

Authors:  Sujitkumar S Hiwale; Hemant Misra; Shrutin Ulman
Journal:  J Med Ultrasound       Date:  2016-12-15

5.  Birth weight prediction models for the different gestational age stages in a Chinese population.

Authors:  Chunhui Li; Yang Peng; Bin Zhang; Weiying Ji; Li Li; Jianhua Gong; Wei Xia; Yuanyuan Li; Shuna Jin; Ranran Song; Youjie Wang; Shunqing Xu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Ensemble Learning to Improve the Prediction of Fetal Macrosomia and Large-for-Gestational Age.

Authors:  Shangyuan Ye; Hui Zhang; Fuyan Shi; Jing Guo; Suzhen Wang; Bo Zhang
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 4.241

7.  Comparison of sonographic fetal weight estimation formulas in patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes.

Authors:  Chelsie Warshafsky; Stefania Ronzoni; Paula Quaglietta; Eran Weiner; Arthur Zaltz; Jon Barrett; Nir Melamed; Amir Aviram
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Clinical versus sonographic estimation of foetal weight in southwest Nigeria.

Authors:  Akinola S Shittu; Oluwafemi Kuti; Ernest O Orji; Niyi O Makinde; Solomon O Ogunniy; Oluwagbemiga O Ayoola; Salami S Sule
Journal:  J Health Popul Nutr       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.000

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.