Literature DB >> 29456580

The accuracy of ultrasound estimation of fetal weight in comparison to birth weight: A systematic review.

Julia Milner1, Jane Arezina2.   

Abstract

Ultrasound estimation of fetal weight is a highly influential factor in antenatal management, guiding both the timing and mode of delivery of a pregnancy. Although substantial research has investigated the most accurate ultrasound formula for calculating estimated fetal weight, current evidence indicates significant error levels. The aim of this systematic review was to identify the most accurate method, whilst identifying sources of inaccuracy in order to facilitate recommendations for future practice. Seven studies met the inclusion criteria and 11 different formulae were assessed; ultrasound calculation of fetal weight was most commonly overestimated. The Hadlock A formula produced the most accurate results, with the lowest levels of random error. Methods incorporating just two measurement parameters were inconsistent, producing large random errors across multiple studies. Key sources of inaccuracy included difficulties obtaining accurate fetal measurements in late gestation; the remainder were operator dependent, including lack of experience and insufficient training and audit. The accuracy of ultrasound estimated fetal weight has improved in the last decade, though a lack of consistency remains evident. National implementation of a rigorous audit programme would likely improve accuracy further, and increase the confidence and clinical value of the method.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ultrasound; accuracy; birth weight; estimated fetal weight

Year:  2018        PMID: 29456580      PMCID: PMC5810856          DOI: 10.1177/1742271X17732807

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound        ISSN: 1742-271X


  33 in total

1.  Performance of 36 different weight estimation formulae in fetuses with macrosomia.

Authors:  Markus Hoopmann; Harald Abele; Norbert Wagner; Diethlem Wallwiener; Karl O Kagan
Journal:  Fetal Diagn Ther       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 2.587

2.  Suspicion of intrauterine growth restriction: Use of abdominal circumference alone or estimated fetal weight below 10%.

Authors:  Suneet P Chauhan; Jill Cole; Maureen Sanderson; Everett F Magann; James A Scardo
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2006-09

3.  Sonographic fetal weight estimation: which model should be used?

Authors:  Nir Melamed; Yariv Yogev; Israel Meizner; Reuven Mashiach; Ron Bardin; Avi Ben-Haroush
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.153

4.  Ultrasound Fetal Weight Estimation: How Accurate Are We Now Under Emergency Conditions?

Authors:  Kaouther Dimassi; Fatma Douik; Mariem Ajroudi; Amel Triki; Mohamed Faouzi Gara
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  Comparison of fetal weight estimation formulas with and without head measurements.

Authors:  S L Warsof; P Wolf; J Coulehan; J T Queenan
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 6.  Sonographic estimation of fetal weight based on a model of fetal volume.

Authors:  C A Combs; R K Jaekle; B Rosenn; M Pope; M Miodovnik; T A Siddiqi
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Computer-assisted evaluation of ultrasonic fetal weight prediction using multiple regression equations with and without the fetal femur length.

Authors:  J S Woo; C W Wan; K M Cho
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 2.153

8.  Ultrasonic fetal weight prediction: role of head circumference and femur length.

Authors:  C P Weiner; R E Sabbagha; N Vaisrub; M L Socol
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Can a single preterm ultrasound accurately predict birth weight in gestational diabetes?

Authors:  Rachelle A Schwartz; Lisa E Simmonds; Barak Rosenn
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2014-12-23

10.  Ultrasonographic weight estimation in large for gestational age fetuses: a comparison of 17 sonographic formulas and four models algorithms.

Authors:  Paolo Rosati; Maurizio Arduini; Carla Giri; Lorenzo Guariglia
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2010-07
View more
  20 in total

1.  FIGO (international Federation of Gynecology and obstetrics) initiative on fetal growth: best practice advice for screening, diagnosis, and management of fetal growth restriction.

Authors:  Nir Melamed; Ahmet Baschat; Yoav Yinon; Apostolos Athanasiadis; Federico Mecacci; Francesc Figueras; Vincenzo Berghella; Amala Nazareth; Muna Tahlak; H David McIntyre; Fabrício Da Silva Costa; Anne B Kihara; Eran Hadar; Fionnuala McAuliffe; Mark Hanson; Ronald C Ma; Rachel Gooden; Eyal Sheiner; Anil Kapur; Hema Divakar; Diogo Ayres-de-Campos; Liran Hiersch; Liona C Poon; John Kingdom; Roberto Romero; Moshe Hod
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 3.561

2.  Accuracy of estimated fetal weight assessment in fetuses with abdominal wall defects.

Authors:  Laura C Ha; Amanda Craig; Matthew R Grace; Sarah S Osmundson; Emily W Taylor; Lisa C Zuckerwise
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM       Date:  2021-04-23

3.  Fetal Tricuspid Valve Agenesis/Atresia: Testing Predictions of the Embryonic Etiology.

Authors:  Jaeike W Faber; Marieke F J Buijtendijk; Hugo Klarenberg; Arja Suzanne Vink; Bram F Coolen; Antoon F M Moorman; Vincent M Christoffels; Sally-Ann Clur; Bjarke Jensen
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 4.  Accuracy of ultrasound in estimating fetal weight in New Zealand.

Authors:  Sarah Benson-Cooper; Gregory P Tarr; Joanne Kelly; Colleen J Bergin
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2021-01-12

5.  Peer review of third trimester abdominal circumference measurements.

Authors:  Ellen Dyer; Trish Chudleigh
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2020-09-22

6.  Interval growth across gestation in pregnancies with fetal gastroschisis.

Authors:  Kathy Zhang-Rutledge; Marni Jacobs; Elizabeth Patberg; Nancy Field; Kerry Holliman; Katie M Strobel; Aisling Murphy; Diana Robles; Naseem Rangwala; Juan M Gonzalez; Teresa N Sparks
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM       Date:  2021-05-31

7.  A Comparison of Prediction of Adverse Perinatal Outcomes between Hadlock and INTERGROWTH-21st Standards at the Third Trimester.

Authors:  Chen Zhu; Yun-Yun Ren; Jiang-Nan Wu; Qiong-Jie Zhou
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Protocol for the prospective observational clinical study: estimation of fetal weight by MRI to PREdict neonatal MACROsomia (PREMACRO study) and small-for-gestational age neonates.

Authors:  Caroline Kadji; Mieke M Cannie; Andrew Carlin; Jacques C Jani
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Normative placental structure in pregnancy using quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Nickie Andescavage; Kushal Kapse; Yuan-Chiao Lu; Scott D Barnett; Marni Jacobs; Alexis C Gimovsky; Homa Ahmadzia; Jessica Quistorff; Catherine Lopez; Nicole Reinholdt Andersen; Dorothy Bulas; Catherine Limperopoulos
Journal:  Placenta       Date:  2021-07-31       Impact factor: 3.287

10.  Prevalence of Home Births and Associated Risk Profile and Maternal Characteristics, 2016-2018.

Authors:  Sonal Goyal; Katherine Kortsmit; Shanna Cox; Denise V D'Angelo; Lisa Romero; Zsakeba T Henderson; Wanda D Barfield
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 7.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.