Literature DB >> 35149900

Current status of augmented reality in cerebrovascular surgery: a systematic review.

Pedro Aguilar-Salinas1, Salvador F Gutierrez-Aguirre2, Mauricio J Avila1, Peter Nakaji3.   

Abstract

Augmented reality (AR) is an adjuvant tool in neuronavigation to improve spatial and anatomic understanding. The present review aims to describe the current status of intraoperative AR for the treatment of cerebrovascular pathology. A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The following databases were searched: PubMed, Science Direct, Web of Science, and EMBASE up to December, 2020. The search strategy consisted of "augmented reality," "AR," "cerebrovascular," "navigation," "neurovascular," "neurosurgery," and "endovascular" in both AND and OR combinations. Studies included were original research articles with intraoperative application. The manuscripts were thoroughly examined for study design, outcomes, and results. Sixteen studies were identified describing the use of intraoperative AR in the treatment of cerebrovascular pathology. A total of 172 patients were treated for 190 cerebrovascular lesions using intraoperative AR. The most common treated pathology was intracranial aneurysms. Most studies were cases and there was only a case-control study. A head-up display system in the microscope was the most common AR display. AR was found to be useful for tailoring the craniotomy, dura opening, and proper identification of donor and recipient vessels in vascular bypass. Most AR systems were unable to account for tissue deformation. This systematic review suggests that intraoperative AR is becoming a promising and feasible adjunct in the treatment of cerebrovascular pathology. It has been found to be a useful tool in the preoperative planning and intraoperative guidance. However, its clinical benefits remain to be seen.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Augmented reality; Cerebrovascular; Navigation; Neurosurgery

Year:  2022        PMID: 35149900     DOI: 10.1007/s10143-022-01733-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Rev        ISSN: 0344-5607            Impact factor:   3.042


  29 in total

1.  Dex-ray: augmented reality neurosurgical navigation with a handheld video probe.

Authors:  Ralf A Kockro; Yeo Tseng Tsai; Ivan Ng; Peter Hwang; Chuangui Zhu; Kusuma Agusanto; Liang Xiao Hong; Luis Serra
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.654

2.  Intraoperative clinical application of augmented reality in neurosurgery: A systematic review.

Authors:  William Omar Contreras López; Paula Alejandra Navarro; Santiago Crispin
Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg       Date:  2018-11-23       Impact factor: 1.876

3.  Simulation and augmented reality in endovascular neurosurgery: lessons from aviation.

Authors:  Alim P Mitha; Mohammed A Almekhlafi; Major Jameel J Janjua; Felipe C Albuquerque; Cameron G McDougall
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 4.  The state of the art of visualization in mixed reality image guided surgery.

Authors:  Marta Kersten-Oertel; Pierre Jannin; D Louis Collins
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 4.790

Review 5.  Augmented reality for the surgeon: Systematic review.

Authors:  Jang W Yoon; Robert E Chen; Esther J Kim; Oluwaseun O Akinduro; Panagiotis Kerezoudis; Phillip K Han; Phong Si; William D Freeman; Roberto J Diaz; Ricardo J Komotar; Stephen M Pirris; Benjamin L Brown; Mohamad Bydon; Michael Y Wang; Robert E Wharen; Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 2.547

Review 6.  Augmented reality in neurosurgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Antonio Meola; Fabrizio Cutolo; Marina Carbone; Federico Cagnazzo; Mauro Ferrari; Vincenzo Ferrari
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2016-05-07       Impact factor: 3.042

7.  Clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of interactive image-guided craniotomy: clinical comparison between conventional and image-guided meningioma surgery.

Authors:  T S Paleologos; J P Wadley; N D Kitchen; D G Thomas
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.654

8.  Role of cranial and spinal virtual and augmented reality simulation using immersive touch modules in neurosurgical training.

Authors:  Ali Alaraj; Fady T Charbel; Daniel Birk; Matthew Tobin; Mathew Tobin; Cristian Luciano; Pat P Banerjee; Silvio Rizzi; Jeff Sorenson; Kevin Foley; Konstantin Slavin; Ben Roitberg
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.654

9.  Utility of Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality in Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Hasan Sumdani; Pedro Aguilar-Salinas; Mauricio J Avila; Samuel R Barber; Travis Dumont
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 2.210

10.  Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews.

Authors:  Mourad Ouzzani; Hossam Hammady; Zbys Fedorowicz; Ahmed Elmagarmid
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2016-12-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.