Jang W Yoon1, Robert E Chen2,3, Esther J Kim4, Oluwaseun O Akinduro1, Panagiotis Kerezoudis5, Phillip K Han3, Phong Si3, William D Freeman6, Roberto J Diaz7, Ricardo J Komotar8, Stephen M Pirris1,9, Benjamin L Brown1, Mohamad Bydon5, Michael Y Wang8, Robert E Wharen1, Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa1. 1. Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA. 2. Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. 3. Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. 4. Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA. 5. Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA. 6. Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA. 7. Department of Neurosurgery and Neurology, Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 8. Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami Hospital, University of Miami Brain Tumor Initiative, Miami, Florida, USA. 9. St. Vincent's Spine and Brain Institute, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Since the introduction of wearable head-up displays, there has been much interest in the surgical community adapting this technology into routine surgical practice. METHODS: We used the keywords augmented reality OR wearable device OR head-up display AND surgery using PubMed, EBSCO, IEEE and SCOPUS databases. After exclusions, 74 published articles that evaluated the utility of wearable head-up displays in surgical settings were included in our review. RESULTS: Across all studies, the most common use of head-up displays was in cases of live streaming from surgical microscopes, navigation, monitoring of vital signs, and display of preoperative images. The most commonly used head-up display was Google Glass. Head-up displays enhanced surgeons' operating experience; common disadvantages include limited battery life, display size and discomfort. CONCLUSIONS: Due to ergonomic issues with dual-screen devices, augmented reality devices with the capacity to overlay images onto the surgical field will be key features of next-generation surgical head-up displays.
INTRODUCTION: Since the introduction of wearable head-up displays, there has been much interest in the surgical community adapting this technology into routine surgical practice. METHODS: We used the keywords augmented reality OR wearable device OR head-up display AND surgery using PubMed, EBSCO, IEEE and SCOPUS databases. After exclusions, 74 published articles that evaluated the utility of wearable head-up displays in surgical settings were included in our review. RESULTS: Across all studies, the most common use of head-up displays was in cases of live streaming from surgical microscopes, navigation, monitoring of vital signs, and display of preoperative images. The most commonly used head-up display was Google Glass. Head-up displays enhanced surgeons' operating experience; common disadvantages include limited battery life, display size and discomfort. CONCLUSIONS: Due to ergonomic issues with dual-screen devices, augmented reality devices with the capacity to overlay images onto the surgical field will be key features of next-generation surgical head-up displays.
Authors: Pedro Aguilar-Salinas; Salvador F Gutierrez-Aguirre; Mauricio J Avila; Peter Nakaji Journal: Neurosurg Rev Date: 2022-02-11 Impact factor: 3.042
Authors: Paolo Dell'Oglio; Elio Mazzone; Tessa Buckle; Tobias Maurer; Nassir Navab; Matthias N van Oosterom; Clare Schilling; Max Jh Witjes; Alexander L Vahrmeijer; Joachim Klode; Boris Vojnovic; Alexandre Mottrie; Henk G van der Poel; Freddie Hamdy; Fijs Wb van Leeuwen Journal: Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2022-04-15
Authors: Joon Ha; Priya Parekh; David Gamble; James Masters; Peter Jun; Thomas Hester; Timothy Daniels; Mansur Halai Journal: J Clin Orthop Trauma Date: 2021-05-05