Literature DB >> 30579049

Intraoperative clinical application of augmented reality in neurosurgery: A systematic review.

William Omar Contreras López1, Paula Alejandra Navarro2, Santiago Crispin3.   

Abstract

The interest and potential use of augmented reality (AR) in several medical fields since the early 90's has increased consistently. It provides intraoperative guidance for surgical procedures by rendering visible what cannot be seen directly, possibly affecting surgical outcomes. Our objective was to conduct a systematic review of the intraoperative clinical application of augmented reality in neurosurgery, in studies published during the last five years. We carried out an electronic search in the PUBMED database using the terms "Augmented Reality" and "Neurosurgery." After exclusions, 12 published articles that evaluated the utility of intraoperative clinical applications in surgical settings were included in our review. The results evaluated involved AR technique and visualization, time, complications, projection error, and located structures. We can conclude that the neurovascular application is the most frequent type of use for AR in neurosurgery (47.3%), followed by applications in neuro-oncological pathologies (46.7%), and non-vascular and non-neoplasic lesions (5.9%). The use of AR also allows a surgeon to maintain their view on the operative site permanently, and is useful for locating structures, guiding resections, and planning the craniotomy with more precision, decreasing the risk of injury. The intraoperative application of an augmented reality system helps to improve the quality and characteristics of the surgical field image. The injection of 3D images with AR allows for the successful integration of images in vascular, oncological and other lesions without the need of look away from the surgical field, improving safety, surgical experience, or clinical outcome. However, comparative studies are still required to determine its effectiveness.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Augmented reality; Head-mounted display; Intraoperative application; Neurosurgery; Neurosurgical procedures

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30579049     DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.11.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg        ISSN: 0303-8467            Impact factor:   1.876


  5 in total

Review 1.  Current status of augmented reality in cerebrovascular surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Pedro Aguilar-Salinas; Salvador F Gutierrez-Aguirre; Mauricio J Avila; Peter Nakaji
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Augmented Reality in Radiology for Education and Training-A Design Study.

Authors:  Alexander Raith; Christoph Kamp; Christina Stoiber; Andreas Jakl; Markus Wagner
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-02

3.  Image Overlay Surgery Based on Augmented Reality: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Laura Pérez-Pachón; Matthieu Poyade; Terry Lowe; Flora Gröning
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 2.622

4.  Intraprocedural guidance for recanalization of post-thrombotic venous lesions using live overlay of center lines from pre-operative cross-sectional imaging: a preliminary experience.

Authors:  Sri Hari Sundararajan; Raphael Doustaly; Gregoire Avignon; David C Madoff; Ronald S Winokur
Journal:  CVIR Endovasc       Date:  2020-06-21

5.  Augmented reality visualization in brain lesions: a prospective randomized controlled evaluation of its potential and current limitations in navigated microneurosurgery.

Authors:  Anna L Roethe; Judith Rösler; Martin Misch; Peter Vajkoczy; Thomas Picht
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 2.216

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.