| Literature DB >> 35149751 |
Mitra Rezaei1,2, Amirali Soheili3, Seyed Ali Ziai4, Atefeh Fakharian5, Hossein Toreyhi3, Mihan Pourabdollah5, Jahangir Ghorbani5, Mahboobeh Karimi-Galougahi6, Seyed Alireza Mahdaviani7, Maryam Hasanzad7, Alireza Eslaminejad6, Hossein Ali Ghaffaripour7, Saied Mahmoudian5, Zahra Rodafshani8, Maryam Sadat Mirenayat5, Mohammad Varahram5, Majid Marjani9, Payam Tabarsi2, Davood Mansouri2, Hamid Reza Jamaati5, Ali Akbar Velayati2.
Abstract
Primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) is a rare autosomal recessive condition often presenting with chronic respiratory infections in early life. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is used to detect ciliary ultrastructural defects. In this study, we aimed to assess ciliary ultrastructural defects using quantitative methods on TEM to identify its diagnostic role in confirming PCD. Nasal samples of 67 patients, including 37 females and 30 males (20.3 ± 10.7 years old), with suspected PCD symptoms were examined by TEM. The most common presentations were bronchiectasis: 26 (38.8%), chronic sinusitis: 23 (34.3%), and recurrent lower respiratory infections: 21 (31.3%). Secondary ciliary dyskinesia, including compound cilia (41.4%) and extra-tubules (44.3%), were the most prevalent TEM finding. Twelve patients (17.9%) had hallmark diagnostic criteria for PCD (class 1) consisting of 11 (16.4%) outer and inner dynein arm (ODA and IDA) defects and only one concurrent IDA defect and microtubular disorganization. Also, 11 patients (16.4%) had probable criteria for PCD (class 2), 26 (38.8%) had other defects, and 18 (26.9%) had normal ciliary ultrastructure. Among our suspected PCD patients, the most common ultrastructural ciliary defects were extra-tubules and compound cilia. However, the most prevalent hallmark diagnostic defect confirming PCD was simultaneous defects of IDA and ODA.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35149751 PMCID: PMC8837606 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-06370-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Normal ciliary ultrastructure. (A) Tip: cross-sections from the tip of the cilium which consists of single microtubules. It should not be considered a defect. (B) Axoneme: it consists of a central pair of microtubules surrounded by nine peripheral microtubule doublets bond to the center pair by supporting radial spokes (known as the 9 + 2 arrangement) Each doublet possesses outer and inner dynein arms. (C) Base: cross-section at the base of the cilium, where the central pair is not present. Y-shaped linkers bond microtubule doublets together.
Figure 2Class 1 (hallmark) defects. (A) Outer dynein arm (ODA) defect: the absence of at least 7 out of 9 arms like this schematic cross-section in more than 50% of cilia. (B) ODA defect with inner dynein arm (IDA) defect which is defined as the absence of at least 5 out of 9 arms like here in more than 50% of cilia. (C) Microtubular disorganization (MTD) and IDA defect: the presence of IDA defect with disruption of 9 + 2 symmetry in more than 25% of cilia.
Figure 3Inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Figure 4Compound cilia as an SCD. It should be mentioned that some primary defects like ODA defects are also evident in this picture (arrows). (Original magnification: ×140,000). ODA outer dynein arm.
Demographic data, clinical presentation, and ultrastructural ciliary findings of study groups.
| Hallmark defects (n = 12) | Class 2 defects (n = 11) | Other defects (n = 26) | Normal (n = 18) | Total (n = 67) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean age | 18.6 ± 8.8 | 23.5 ± 12.3 | 20.9 ± 11.1 | 18.7 ± 10.8 | 20.3 ± 10.7 |
| Gender | |||||
| Male | 6 (50%) | 2 (18%) | 14 (54%) | 8 (44%) | 30 (45%) |
| Female | 6 (50%) | 9 (81%) | 12 (46%) | 10 (56%) | 37 (55%) |
| Productive cough | 0 | 0 | 1 (4%) | 1 (5%) | 2 (3%) |
| Bronchiectasis | 5 (42%) | 5 (45%) | 7 (27%) | 9 (50%) | 26 (39%) |
| Recurrent sinusitis | 3 (25%) | 5 (45%) | 10 (38%) | 5 (28%) | 23 (34%) |
| Infertility | 2 (17%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 (3%) |
| Polyposis | 0 | 0 | 1 (4%) | 0 | 1 (1%) |
| Recurrent lower respiratory tract infection | 6 (50%) | 4 (36%) | 6 (23%) | 5 (28%) | 21 (31%) |
| Auditory symptoms | 2 (17%) | 2 (18%) | 1 (4%) | 0 | 5 (7%) |
| Situs Inversus | 3 (25%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 (4%) |
| ODA defect | |||||
| ODA absence < 25% | 0 | 0 | 1 (4%) | 0 | 1 (1%) |
| ODA absence from 25–50% | 0 | 3 (27%) | 0 | 0 | 3 (4%) |
| ODA defect (absence > 50%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| IDA defect | |||||
| IDA absence < 25% | 0 | 2 (18%) | 2 (8%) | 0 | 4 (6%) |
| IDA absence 25–50% | 0 | 0 | 2 (8%) | 0 | 2 (3%) |
| IDA defect (absence > 50%) | 1 (8%) | 3 (27%) | 6 (23%) | 0 | 10 (15%) |
| Both ODA & IDA defects | |||||
| ODA & IDA absence < 25% | 0 | 1 (9%) | 2 (8%) | 0 | 3 (4%) |
| ODA & IDA absence 25–50% | 0 | 8 (73%) | 0 | 0 | 8 (12%) |
| ODA + IDA defect (absence > 50%) | 11 (92%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 (16%) |
| Microtubular disorganization | |||||
| Disruption of 9 + 2 symmetry (microtubular disorganization (≤ 25%)) | 3 (25%) | 6 (54%) | 14 (54%) | 0 | 23 (34%) |
| Microtubular disorganization (> 25%) | 1 (8%) | 0 | 1 (4%) | 0 | 2 (3%) |
| Central pair missing | |||||
| One central MT missing (≤ 20%) | 2 (17%) | 0 | 2 (8%) | 0 | 4 (6%) |
| One central MT missing (> 20%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Both central pair MTs missing (≤ 20%) | 3 (25%) | 3 (27%) | 9 (35%) | 0 | 15 (22%) |
| Both central pair MTs missing (> 20%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
ODA outer dynein arm, IDA inner dynein arm, MT microtubule.
Clinical presentations and TEM findings among confirmed cases of PCD.
| Case No. | Age | Gender | Clinical presentations | TEM ultrastructure | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RRI | AS | RS | SI | B | I | Class 1 | Others | ||||||
| ODA + IDA | IDA + MTD | Extra-tubule | Compound tubule | Both of the central pair missing | |||||||||
| 29 | 14 | M | + | − | − | − | − | − | + | − | + | + | − |
| 49 | 17 | F | + | − | − | − | − | − | + | − | + | − | − |
| 70 | 10 | F | + | + | − | − | − | − | + | − | + | + | − |
| 32 | 13 | M | + | − | − | − | − | − | + | − | − | − | − |
| 33 | 19 | M | − | − | + | + | − | − | + | − | − | − | − |
| 50 | 4 | F | + | − | − | − | − | − | + | − | − | − | − |
| 58 | 24 | F | − | − | + | − | + | + | + | − | + | − | − |
| 65 | 18 | F | − | − | − | − | + | − | + | − | − | − | − |
| 46 | 32 | M | − | − | + | + | + | + | + | − | + | − | |
| 82 | 24 | F | − | − | − | − | + | − | + | − | − | + | |
| 86 | 34 | M | + | − | − | + | − | − | − | + | + | + | + |
| 87 | 15 | M | − | + | − | − | + | − | + | − | − | + | |
PCD primary ciliary dyskinesia, TEM transmission electron microscopy, M male, F female, RRI recurrent lower respiratory infection, AS auditory symptoms, RS recurrent sinusitis, SI Situs Inversus, B bronchiectasis, I infertility, ODA outer dynein arm, IDA inner dynein arm, MTD microtubular disorganization.
Figure 5Microtubular disorganization (arrows) (Original magnification: ×50,000).
Figure 6IDA and ODA defects. (a) ODA defects (arrows). (b, c, d) Some absence of IDA (I) and ODA (O) are marked. (Original magnification: a, c & d: ×50,000, b: ×140,000).
Figure 7Challenges of PCD diagnosis and possible solutions. TEM transmission electron microscopy, PCD primary ciliary dyskinesia, SCD secondary ciliary dyskinesia, PICADAR PrImary CiliAry DyskinesiA Rule, IF immunofluorescence, nNO nasal nitric oxide, HSVA high-speed video analysis.