| Literature DB >> 35146035 |
Davis L Rogers1, Walter Klyce1, Tymoteusz J Kajstura1, R Jay Lee1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The association between body mass index (BMI) and severity of osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) of the knee at presentation is poorly understood. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that adolescents in higher BMI percentiles for age and sex would have OCD lesions that were more severe at their initial presentation and located more posteriorly on the condyle as compared with adolescents in lower BMI percentiles. STUDYEntities:
Keywords: adolescent; angle of incidence; body mass index; obesity; osteochondritis dissecans; pediatrics; severity
Year: 2021 PMID: 35146035 PMCID: PMC8822100 DOI: 10.1177/23259671211045382
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Orthop J Sports Med ISSN: 2325-9671
Figure 1.Patient-selection flowchart. Of the initial study population, 77 patients were included in the analysis of markers of lesion severity. Radiographic measurements were available for 61 patients, who were included in the analysis of the angle-of-lesion incidence. BMI, body mass index; OCD, osteochondritis dissecans.
Figure 2.Radiographs showing steps taken to measure the angle of osteochondritis dissecans lesion on the femoral condyle. (A) A best-fit circle was applied to the distal femoral condyles, typically with the center of the circle resting on the epiphyseal plate. (B) The anatomic femoral shaft axis was determined using the anterior and posterior femoral cortices as references, and a line parallel to this axis was drawn through the center of the best-fit circle. (C) Angle measurements anterior to this line were recorded as negative and measurements posterior as positive.
Markers of Lesion Severity and Location for 77 Adolescents With Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Knee, Stratified by BMI Threshold of the 80th Percentile
| Percentile, No. (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| <80th (n = 46) | ≥80th (n = 31) | χ2 Statistic
|
| RR (95% CI) | |
| Surgical treatment | 26 (57) | 24 (77) | 3.5 | .06 | 1.4 (0.99-1.9) |
| Marker of severity | |||||
| Cystic changes | 16 (35) | 10 (32) | 0.05 | .82 | 0.93 (0.49-1.8) |
| Loose fragments | 9 (20) | 8 (26) | 0.42 | .52 | 1.3 (0.57-3.0) |
| Subchondral edema | 10 (22) | 17 (55) | 8.9 |
| 2.5 (1.3-4.8) |
| Subchondral fluid | 22 (48) | 21 (68) | 3.0 | .08 | 1.4 (0.94-2.0) |
| Lesion location | |||||
| Bilateral condyles | 8 (17) | 7 (23) | 0.32 | .57 | 1.3 (0.52-3.2) |
| Lateral condyle | 15 (33) | 4 (13) | 3.9 | .071 | 2.1 (0.14-1.1) |
| Medial condyle | 31 (67) | 27 (87) | 3.9 |
| 1.3 (1.01-1.7) |
BMI percentile for age and sex according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. BMI, body mass index; RR, risk ratio.
For all, df = 1 and N = 77.
Bold P values indicate statistically significant difference between patient groups (P < .05).
Figure 3.Markers of severity vs body mass index (BMI) percentiles. The cumulative percentage of each marker of lesion severity was plotted according to BMI percentile. Linear regression analysis showed significant correlations between higher BMI and presence of ≥1 marker of lesion severity, subchondral edema, subchondral fluid, loose fragments, and surgical treatment. We found no correlation between BMI and cystic changes, although cystic changes was the only variable that decreased overall with increasing BMI.
Chi-square Analysis for Each Variable by BMI Category
| Across All Groups | Normal vs Overweight/Obese | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| χ2 Statistic
|
| χ2 Statistic
|
| |
| Surgical treatment | 0.57 | .75 | 0.48 | .49 |
| Marker of severity | ||||
| Cystic changes | 4.9 | .09 | 3.0 | .08 |
| Loose fragments | 0.30 | .86 | 0.15 | .70 |
| Subchondral edema | 2.4 | .30 | 2.3 | .13 |
| Subchondral fluid | 0.98 | .61 | 0.68 | .41 |
| Lesion location | ||||
| Bilateral condyles | 1.2 | .56 | 0.38 | .54 |
| Lateral condyle | 3.8 | .15 | 3.5 | .06 |
| Medial condyle | 3.8 | .15 | 3.5 | .06 |
BMI percentile for age and sex according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. BMI, body mass index.
For all, df = 2 and n = 75.
For all, df = 1 and n = 75.
Angle of Lesion for 61 Adolescents With Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Knee by BMI Category
| BMI Category | No. | Angle, deg
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Normal weight | 38 | 21 ± 17 | |
| Overweight | 9 | 15 ± 15 | .47 |
| Obese | 12 | 14 ± 18 | .19 |
| Combined overweight/obese | 21 | 14 ± 16 | .13 |
| All patients | 61 | 18 ± 17 |
BMI categories determined according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention percentiles for age and sex: normal, 5th to <85th percentile; overweight, 85th to <95th; and obese, ≥95th. BMI, body mass index.
Positive measurements are indicated in reference to angles posterior to the reference line parallel to the femoral shaft axis (see Figure 2). Values are presented as mean ± SD.
Compared with normal-weight group.
Includes 2 underweight patients.
Markers of Lesion Severity and Location for 77 Adolescents With Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Knee by BMI Category
| Patients, No. (%) | Overweight (n = 13) | Obese (n = 12) | Overweight/Obese (n = 25) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All (N = 77) | Normal Weight (n = 50) | No. (%) | RR (95% CI)
| No. (%) | RR (95% CI)
| No. (%) | RR (95% CI)
| |
| Surgical treatment | 50 (65) | 32 (64) | 9 (69) | 1.1 (0.71-1.6) | 9 (75) | 1.2 (0.80-1.7) | 18 (72) | 1.1 (0.81-1.6) |
| Marker of severity | ||||||||
| Cystic changes | 26 (34) | 20 (40) | 1 (7.7) | 0.19 (0.03-1.2) | 4 (33) | 0.83 (0.35-2.0) | 5 (20) | 0.5 (0.21-1.2) |
| Loose fragments | 17 (22) | 12 (24) | 2 (15) | 0.64 (0.16-2.5) | 2 (17) | 0.69 (0.18-2.7) | 5 (20) | 0.83 (0.33-2.1) |
| Subchondral edema | 27 (35) | 15 (30) | 6 (46) | 1.5 (0.68-3.0) | 6 (50) | 1.7 (0.82-3.4) | 12 (48) | 0.71 (0.89-2.9) |
| Subchondral fluid | 43 (56) | 27 (54) | 9 (69) | 1.3 (0.75-1.9) | 7 (58) | 1.1 (0.63-1.9) | 16 (64) | 1.2 (0.80-1.8) |
| Lesion location | ||||||||
| Bilateral condyles | 15 (20) | 9 (18) | 4 (31) | 1.7 (0.62-4.7) | 2 (17) | 0.93 (0.23-3.7) | 6 (24) | 1.3 (0.53-3.3) |
| Lateral condyle | 19 (25) | 16 (32) | 1 (7.7) | 0.24 (0.04-1.6) | 2 (17) | 0.52 (0.14-2.0) | 3 (12) | 2.0 (0.12-1.2) |
| Medial condyle | 58 (75) | 34 (68) | 12 (92) | 1.4 (0.95-1.7) | 10 (83) | 1.2 (0.89-1.7) | 22 (88) | 1.6 (1.0-1.6) |
BMI categories determined according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention percentiles for age and sex: normal weight, 5th to <85th percentile; overweight, 85th to <95th; and obese, ≥95th. BMI, body mass index; RR, risk ratio.
Includes 2 underweight patients.
RR compared with normal-weight group.
Figure 4.Sample comparison based on T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of angle-of-lesion incidence between (A) a patient with a body mass index (BMI) percentile in the obese range vs (B) a patient with a BMI percentile in the normal range. (A) A patient in the 97th BMI percentile with a mean angle-of-lesion incidence of −7.28° (anterior to the reference line). (B) A patient in the 45th BMI percentile with a mean angle-of-lesion incidence of 44.6° (posterior to the reference line).