| Literature DB >> 35615649 |
Ming-Ze Du1,2, Tong Su1,2, Yan-Fang Jiang1,2, Chen Jiao1,2, Qin-Wei Guo1,2, Yue-Lin Hu1,2, Dong Jiang1,2.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the mid- to long-term outcome of concurrent arthroscopic treatment of osteochondral lesion (OCL) and open anatomical repair of lateral ankle ligaments for severe acute ankle sprain patients and compare them to the outcome of those without OCL.Entities:
Keywords: acute ankle sprain; arthroscopy; lateral ankle ligament; osteochondral lesion; return to play
Year: 2022 PMID: 35615649 PMCID: PMC9124844 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.816669
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Surg ISSN: 2296-875X
Demographic data and characteristics of two groups.
| Group A ( | Group B ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | 0.697 | ||
| Male | 31 | 71 | |
| Female | 12 | 34 | |
| Age (years) | 29.1 ± 9.3 | 26.3 ± 10.7 | 0.052 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.8 ± 3.1 | 23.4 ± 3.5 | 0.009* |
| Injury time (days) | 8.8 ± 5.0 | 7.0 ± 3.5 | 0.065 |
| Follow-up time (months) | 63.6 ± 27.5 | 61.4 ± 21.0 | 0.828 |
| Side | 0.718 | ||
| Left | 24 | 62 | |
| Right | 19 | 43 | |
| Types of ligaments injury | 0.331 | ||
| ATFL + CFL repair | 33 | 84 | |
| ATFL repair | 8 | 21 | |
| CFL repair | 2 | 0 |
* Statistically significant difference (p < 0.05).
Lesions and treatment of two groups.
| Group A ( | Group B ( | |
|---|---|---|
| OCL | ||
| Zone 4 | 25 | |
| Zone 6 | 13 | |
| Zone 3 | 5 | |
| Tibial plafond | 2 | |
| Ferkle and Cheng stage | ||
| B–C | 22 | |
| D–F | 21 | |
| Osteophyte resection | 10 | 5 |
| Loose body remove | 7 | 15 |
| Types of ligament injury | ||
| ATFL + CFL repair | 33 | 84 |
| ATFL repair | 8 | 21 |
| CFL repair | 2 | 0 |
Comparison of the clinical evaluation of two groups.
| Group A ( | Group B ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Recovery of sports | |||
| Percentage (%) | 91.2 ± 11.2 | 90.9 ± 13.3 | 0.761 |
| Time (months) | 4.4 ± 1.0 | 4.4 ± 1.2 | 0.716 |
| ROM restriction, | 5 | 13 | 0.934 |
| Sprain recurrence, | 7 | 10 | 0.612 |
| Satisfaction (%) | 79.4 ± 11.1 | 83.8 ± 7.5 | 0.194 |
| VAS pain | |||
| Preoperation | 6.0 ± 2.0 | 6.0 ± 1.3 | 0.388 |
| Postoperation | 0.8 ± 1.7 | 0.3 ± 0.8 | 0.027* |
| Pre–post changes | 6.3 ± 2.9 | 5.8 ± 1.6 | 0.543 |
| AOFAS | |||
| Preoperation | 28.6 ± 17.6 | 24.3 ± 8.2 | 0.352 |
| Postoperation | 97.5 ± 4.8 | 98.4 ± 3.7 | 0.278 |
| Pre–post changes | 68.8 ± 20.8 | 74.6 ± 9.0 | 0.135 |
| Tegner | |||
| Preoperation | 1.0 ± 0.6 | 0.7 ± 0.6 | 0.356 |
| Postoperation | 4.3 ± 1.2 | 4.4 ± 2.2 | 0.116 |
| Pre–post changes | 3.3 ± 1.3 | 3.5 ± 1.0 | 0.145 |
* Statistically significant difference (p < 0.05).
Other influencing factors related to the VAS pain score.
| Preoperation | Postoperation | Pre–post changes | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | 0.363 | 0.617 | 0.259 | |||
| Male | 6.1 ± 1.9 | 0.8 ± 1.6 | 6.1 ± 2.6 | |||
| Female | 6.5 ± 1 | 0.5 ± 1.2 | 6 ± 1.8 | |||
| Age (years) | 0.288 | 0.154 | 0.567 | |||
| <20 | 6.2 ± 2.5 | 1.8 ± 2.5 | 7.1 ± 3.9 | |||
| 20–40 | 5.8 ± 1.9 | 0.6 ± 1.3 | 6.1 ± 2.7 | |||
| ≥40 | 6.8 ± 0.8 | 0.5 ± 1.2 | 6.3 ± 0.8 | |||
| BMI (kg/m2) | 0.228 | 0.185 | 0.428 | |||
| <24 | 5.2 ± 2.3 | 1.1 ± 2.3 | 6.7 ± 3.9 | |||
| 24–28 | 6.6 ± 0.8 | 0.4 ± 0.9 | 6.2 ± 1.2 | |||
| ≥28 | 7.1 ± 2 | 1.3 ± 1.4 | 5.9 ± 2.9 | |||
| Side | 0.812 | 0.292 | 0.812 | |||
| Left | 6 ± 1.9 | 0.7 ± 1.8 | 6.3 ± 2.9 | |||
| Right | 6.1 ± 2.1 | 1 ± 1.6 | 6.5 ± 2.9 | |||
| Ferkle and Cheng stage | 0.564 | 0.038* | 0.364 | |||
| B–C | 6.3 ± 1.4 | 0.3 ± 0.9 | 5.7 ± 1.3 | |||
| D–F | 5.9 ± 2.3 | 1.3 ± 2.1 | 6.8 ± 3.6 | |||
| Location | 0.201 | 0.225 | 0.629 | |||
| Zone 4 | 6.5 ± 1.5 | 0.6 ± 1.1 | 5.9 ± 1.4 | |||
| Zone 6 | 5.8 ± 2.1 | 0.9 ± 2.3 | 6.9 ± 3.4 | |||
| Zone 3 | 4.4 ± 2.9 | 2 ± 2.5 | 6.8 ± 6.1 |
* Statistically significant difference (p < 0.05).