Literature DB >> 35142980

Peri-operative and survival outcomes analysis of patients with endometrial cancer managed by three surgical approaches: a long-term Bulgarian experience.

Slavcho T Tomov1, Grigor A Gorchev2, Desislava K Kiprova2, Aleksandar D Lyubenov2, Nadezhda H Hinkova2, Vesela D Tomova2, Zornitsa V Gorcheva2, Sarfraz Ahmad3,4.   

Abstract

The study aim was to assess the peri-operative, oncologic, and survival outcomes for patients with endometrial cancer (EC) managed by abdominal hysterectomy (AH), laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH), or robotic hysterectomy (RH) approaches at premier centers in Bulgaria. We analyzed histologically diagnosed EC cases operated via any of the three surgical methods during 2008-2019. Data analyses included patients and tumor characteristics, peri-operative outcomes, and disease status. We grouped FIGO stages I and II to represent early-stage EC and to investigate their survival. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were performed to determine disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Consecutive 917 patients (AH = 466; LH = 60, RH = 391) formed the basis of study analyses. Most of demographics and tumor characteristics of the patients were comparable across the groups except few minor variations (e.g., LH/RH cases were younger, heavier, more stage IA, endometrioid, G1, low-risk group). LH and RH group cases had significantly lower operative time than AH (p < 0.001), shorter hospital length-of-stay (p < 0.001), higher post-operative Hgb (p < 0.001). RH cases had fewer blood transfusions than AH or LH (p < 0.001). Cox multivariate analyses indicate that OS was not influenced by the type of surgical approach. Despite the fact that the DFS in "early-stage" EC is significantly better in AH group than RH, the type of surgery (i.e., AH, LH, or RH) for "all stages" is insignificant factor for DFS. With our long-term experience, minimally invasive surgical approach resulted in superior peri-operative, oncologic, and survival outcomes. Specifically, RH is not only safe in terms of post-operative results, but also for mortality and oncologic rates.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abdominal vs. laparoscopic vs. robotic surgery; Bulgarian experience; Endometrial cancer; Oncologic factors; Peri-operative outcomes; Survival analysis

Year:  2022        PMID: 35142980     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-022-01374-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  48 in total

Review 1.  Robotic surgery for early stage cervical cancer: Evolution and current trends.

Authors:  Erin E Medlin; David M Kushner; Lisa Barroilhet
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.454

2.  Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal versus abdominal surgery in patients with endometrial cancer--a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  S Malur; M Possover; W Michels; A Schneider
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 3.  Robotic-assisted hysterectomy for endometrial cancer compared with traditional laparoscopic and laparotomy approaches: a systematic review.

Authors:  Giorgia Gaia; Robert W Holloway; Luigi Santoro; Sarfraz Ahmad; Elena Di Silverio; Arsenio Spinillo
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  A case matched analysis of robotic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy.

Authors:  Ricardo Estape; Nicholas Lambrou; Robert Diaz; Eric Estape; Natalie Dunkin; Angel Rivera
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2009-04-05       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Effect of Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy vs Total Abdominal Hysterectomy on Disease-Free Survival Among Women With Stage I Endometrial Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Monika Janda; Val Gebski; Lucy C Davies; Peta Forder; Alison Brand; Russell Hogg; Thomas W Jobling; Russell Land; Tom Manolitsas; Marcelo Nascimento; Deborah Neesham; James L Nicklin; Martin K Oehler; Geoff Otton; Lewis Perrin; Stuart Salfinger; Ian Hammond; Yee Leung; Peter Sykes; Hextan Ngan; Andrea Garrett; Michael Laney; Tong Yow Ng; Karfai Tam; Karen Chan; C David Wrede; Selvan Pather; Bryony Simcock; Rhonda Farrell; Gregory Robertson; Graeme Walker; Nigel R Armfield; Nick Graves; Anthony J McCartney; Andreas Obermair
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Robotically assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Sara A DeNardis; Robert W Holloway; Glenn E Bigsby; Dirk P Pikaart; Sarfraz Ahmad; Neil J Finkler
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO Consensus Conference on Endometrial Cancer: diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.

Authors:  N Colombo; C Creutzberg; F Amant; T Bosse; A González-Martín; J Ledermann; C Marth; R Nout; D Querleu; M R Mirza; C Sessa
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 32.976

8.  Laparoscopic hysterectomy using a computer-enhanced surgical robot.

Authors:  C Diaz-Arrastia; C Jurnalov; G Gomez; C Townsend
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Laparoscopically assisted surgical staging (LASS) of endometrial cancer.

Authors:  J M Childers; P R Brzechffa; K D Hatch; E A Surwit
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 5.482

10.  Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of patients with early stage endometrial cancer: a randomized multi center study.

Authors:  Claudia B M Bijen; Justine M Briët; Geertruida H de Bock; Henriëtte J G Arts; Johanna A Bergsma-Kadijk; Marian J E Mourits
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.