Literature DB >> 26768315

Robotic surgery for early stage cervical cancer: Evolution and current trends.

Erin E Medlin1, David M Kushner1, Lisa Barroilhet1.   

Abstract

The management of early stage cervical cancer often includes surgery in the form of radical hysterectomy, radical trachelectomy, or radical parametrectomy. Surgical techniques have evolved to include minimal invasive approaches, and more recently, to include robotic assisted techniques. This review highlights the evolution of surgical management of early cervical cancer and specifically explores robotic assisted radical hysterectomy, radical trachelectomy, radical parametrectomy, and the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Robotic surgery; cervical cancer; gynecologic oncology; minimally invasive surgery

Mesh：

Year:  2015        PMID： 26768315     DOI： 10.1002/jso.24008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Oncol        ISSN： 0022-4790            Impact factor:   3.454


  7 in total

1.  Minimally Invasive vs. Open Hepatectomy: a Comparative Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.

Authors:  Fabio Bagante; Gaya Spolverato; Steven M Strasberg; Faiz Gani; Vanessa Thompson; Bruce L Hall; David J Bentrem; Henry A Pitt; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy for radical hysterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.

Authors:  Benny Brandt; Vasileios Sioulas; Derman Basaran; Theresa Kuhn; Katherine LaVigne; Ginger J Gardner; Yukio Sonoda; Dennis S Chi; Kara C Long Roche; Jennifer J Mueller; Elizabeth L Jewell; Vance A Broach; Oliver Zivanovic; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Mario M Leitao
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Peri-operative and survival outcomes analysis of patients with endometrial cancer managed by three surgical approaches: a long-term Bulgarian experience.

Authors:  Slavcho T Tomov; Grigor A Gorchev; Desislava K Kiprova; Aleksandar D Lyubenov; Nadezhda H Hinkova; Vesela D Tomova; Zornitsa V Gorcheva; Sarfraz Ahmad
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2022-02-10

4.  Minimally invasive surgery techniques in pelvic exenteration: a systematic and meta-analysis review.

Authors: 
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Case report: term birth after fertility-sparing treatments for stage IB1 small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix.

Authors:  Pei-Ying Wu; Ya-Min Cheng; Geok Huey New; Cheng-Yang Chou; Chun-Ting Chiang; Hung-Wen Tsai; Yu-Fang Huang
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 2.809

6.  Efficacy of robotic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer compared with that of open and laparoscopic surgery: A separate meta-analysis of high-quality studies.

Authors:  Sha-Sha Zhang; Tian Ding; Zheng-Hui Cui; Yuan Lv; Ruo-An Jiang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  Comparative analysis of robotic vs laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Li Chen; Li-Ping Liu; Na Wen; Xiao Qiao; Yuan-Guang Meng
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2019-10-26       Impact factor: 1.337
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.