Literature DB >> 3513899

Pupillary responses to syntactic ambiguity of sentences.

M Schluroff, T E Zimmermann, R B Freeman, K Hofmeister, T Lorscheid, A Weber.   

Abstract

Pupillary responses have proven to be reliable physiological correlates of cognitive effort in a variety of tasks, including language processing. To investigate the relation between psychological and syntactic complexity 20 syntactically ambiguous sentences, balanced for bias, were presented to 16 subjects, while their pupil size was continuously measured. These sentences could be read as verb oriented (syntactically more complex) or object oriented (syntactically less complex). Principal components analysis of pupillary movements revealed that verb-oriented readings, resulted in greater pupillary dilations than object-oriented readings, indicating that syntactically more complex sentences, as determined via a formal grammar, require greater cognitive effort in processing. This is viewed as further evidence for the notion that syntactic and psychological complexity are related. High- and low-bias sentences did not induce comparable differences in pupillary movements, indicating that the "multiple meaning theory" may have to be modified.

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3513899     DOI: 10.1016/0093-934x(86)90023-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Lang        ISSN: 0093-934X            Impact factor:   2.381


  11 in total

1.  Systematic influence of gaze position on pupil size measurement: analysis and correction.

Authors:  Benjamin Gagl; Stefan Hawelka; Florian Hutzler
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2011-12

2.  Pupillary responses during a joint attention task are associated with nonverbal cognitive abilities and sub-clinical symptoms of autism.

Authors:  Valentyna Erstenyuk; Meghan R Swanson; Michael Siller
Journal:  Res Autism Spectr Disord       Date:  2014-06-01

Review 3.  Eyes and ears: Using eye tracking and pupillometry to understand challenges to speech recognition.

Authors:  Kristin J Van Engen; Drew J McLaughlin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  A Novel Pupillometric Method for Indexing Word Difficulty in Individuals With and Without Aphasia.

Authors:  Laura R Chapman; Brooke Hallowell
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  The contribution of temporal analysis of pupillometry measurements to cognitive research.

Authors:  Ronen Hershman; Dalit Milshtein; Avishai Henik
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-02-18

6.  Publication guidelines and recommendations for pupillary measurement in psychophysiological studies.

Authors:  Stuart R Steinhauer; Margaret M Bradley; Greg J Siegle; Kathryn A Roecklein; Annika Dix
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 4.348

Review 7.  Best Practices and Advice for Using Pupillometry to Measure Listening Effort: An Introduction for Those Who Want to Get Started.

Authors:  Matthew B Winn; Dorothea Wendt; Thomas Koelewijn; Stefanie E Kuchinsky
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

8.  Analyzing the Time Course of Pupillometric Data.

Authors:  Jacolien van Rij; Petra Hendriks; Hedderik van Rijn; R Harald Baayen; Simon N Wood
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  Cortical modulation of pupillary function: systematic review.

Authors:  Costanza Peinkhofer; Daniel Kondziella; Gitte M Knudsen; Rita Moretti
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  PupilEXT: Flexible Open-Source Platform for High-Resolution Pupillometry in Vision Research.

Authors:  Babak Zandi; Moritz Lode; Alexander Herzog; Georgios Sakas; Tran Quoc Khanh
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.