Literature DB >> 26163655

A Novel Pupillometric Method for Indexing Word Difficulty in Individuals With and Without Aphasia.

Laura R Chapman, Brooke Hallowell.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Cognitive effort is a clinically important facet of linguistic processing that is often overlooked in the assessment and treatment of people with aphasia (PWA). Furthermore, there is a paucity of valid ways to index cognitive effort in PWA. The construct of cognitive effort has been indexed for decades via pupillometry (measurement of pupil dilation and constriction during a cognitive task), yet pupillometry has not been implemented in studies including PWA. In the present study, we tested a novel method for indexing cognitive effort during linguistic processing in people with and without aphasia.
METHOD: Forty control participants and 39 PWA listened to semantically easy and difficult single nouns and looked at images while their pupillary responses were monitored. Mean pupil dilation in response to easy versus difficult nouns was calculated to index cognitive effort.
RESULTS: Larger mean pupil dilation values were obtained for difficult compared with easy nouns for both groups.
CONCLUSION: Results provide preliminary evidence that pupillometry can be used to index cognitive effort during linguistic processing of single nouns in people with and without aphasia. Methods for indexing cognitive effort will be a valuable addition to existing assessment methods. Suggestions for further research are offered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26163655      PMCID: PMC4686311          DOI: 10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-14-0287

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  56 in total

1.  Age of acquisition modulates the amplitude of the P300 component in spoken word recognition.

Authors:  Marie-Josèphe Tainturier; Jakke Tamminen; Guillaume Thierry
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2005-01-12       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Pupillary dilation as an index of task demands.

Authors:  Raúl Cabestrero; Antonio Crespo; Pilar Quirós
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  2009-12

3.  Pupil size, information overload, and performance differences.

Authors:  W S Peavler
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Pupillary responses during a short-term memory task: cognitive processing, arousal, or both?

Authors:  D A Johnson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1971-10

5.  Evidence for alternative strategies of sentence retention.

Authors:  P Wright; D Kahneman
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1971-05       Impact factor: 2.143

6.  Pupil dilation as a measure of processing load in simultaneous interpretation and other language tasks.

Authors:  J Hyönä; J Tommola; A M Alaja
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1995-08

7.  Aphasic naming: what matters?

Authors:  L Nickels; D Howard
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Revisiting Snodgrass and Vanderwart's object pictorial set: the role of surface detail in basic-level object recognition.

Authors:  Bruno Rossion; Gilles Pourtois
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  Pupil diameter covaries with BOLD activity in human locus coeruleus.

Authors:  Peter R Murphy; Redmond G O'Connell; Michael O'Sullivan; Ian H Robertson; Joshua H Balsters
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Information processing vs pupil diameter.

Authors:  G K Poock
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1973-12
View more
  8 in total

1.  The Unfolding of Cognitive Effort During Sentence Processing: Pupillometric Evidence From People With and Without Aphasia.

Authors:  Laura Roche Chapman; Brooke Hallowell
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 2.674

2.  Expecting Questions Modulates Cognitive Effort in a Syntactic Processing Task: Evidence From Pupillometry.

Authors:  Laura Roche Chapman; Brooke Hallowell
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-12-29       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Contrast Is in the Eye of the Beholder: Infelicitous Beat Gesture Increases Cognitive Load During Online Spoken Discourse Comprehension.

Authors:  Laura M Morett; Jennifer M Roche; Scott H Fraundorf; James C McPartland
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2020-10

4.  Pupillary Measures of the Cognitive Effort in Auditory Novel Word Processing and Short-Term Retention.

Authors:  Susana López-Ornat; Alexandra Karousou; Carlos Gallego; Leire Martín; Raquel Camero
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-11-27

5.  Individual Variations in Effort: Assessing Pupillometry for the Hearing Impaired.

Authors:  Anita E Wagner; Leanne Nagels; Paolo Toffanin; Jane M Opie; Deniz Başkent
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

6.  Pupillometry as a reliable metric of auditory detection and discrimination across diverse stimulus paradigms in animal models.

Authors:  Pilar Montes-Lourido; Manaswini Kar; Isha Kumbam; Srivatsun Sadagopan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  The Pupil Dilation Response to Auditory Stimuli: Current State of Knowledge.

Authors:  Adriana A Zekveld; Thomas Koelewijn; Sophia E Kramer
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

8.  Pupil Dilation Is Sensitive to Semantic Ambiguity and Acoustic Degradation.

Authors:  Mason Kadem; Björn Herrmann; Jennifer M Rodd; Ingrid S Johnsrude
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.