Literature DB >> 35138522

Rate adaptive pacing in people with chronic heart failure increases peak heart rate but not peak exercise capacity: a systematic review.

H I Clark1, M J Pearson2, N A Smart2.   

Abstract

Rate adaptive cardiac pacing (RAP) allows increased heart rate (HR) in response to metabolic demand in people with implantable electronic cardiac devices (IECD). The aim of this work was to conduct a systematic review to determine if RAP increases peak exercise capacity (peak VO2) in line with peak HR in people with chronic heart failure. We conducted a systematic literature search from 1980, when IECD and RAP were first introduced, until 31 July 2021. Databases searched include PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, EBSCO, and the Clinical Trials Register. A comprehensive search of the literature produced a total of 246 possible studies; of these, 14 studies were included. Studies and subsequent analyses were segregated according to comparison, specifically standard RAP (RAPON) vs fixed rate pacing (RAPOFF), and tailored RAP (TLD RAPON) vs standard RAP (RAPON). Pooled analyses were conducted for peak VO2 and peak HR for RAPON vs RAPOFF. Peak HR significantly increased by 15 bpm with RAPON compared to RAPOFF (95%CI, 7.98-21.97, P < 0.0001). There was no significant difference between pacing mode for peak VO2 0.45 ml kg-1 min-1 (95%CI, - 0.55-1.47, P = 0.38). This systematic review revealed RAP increased peak HR in people with CHF; however, there was no concomitant improvement in peak VO2. Rather RAP may provide benefits at submaximal intensities by controlling the rise in HR to optimise cardiac output at lower workloads. HR may be an important outcome of CHF management, reflecting myocardial efficiency.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic heart failure; Chronotropic incompetence; Exercise capacity; Heart rate; Rate adaptive pacing

Year:  2022        PMID: 35138522     DOI: 10.1007/s10741-022-10217-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Fail Rev        ISSN: 1382-4147            Impact factor:   4.214


  70 in total

1.  Cardiac resynchronization in chronic heart failure.

Authors:  William T Abraham; Westby G Fisher; Andrew L Smith; David B Delurgio; Angel R Leon; Evan Loh; Dusan Z Kocovic; Milton Packer; Alfredo L Clavell; David L Hayes; Myrvin Ellestad; Robin J Trupp; Jackie Underwood; Faith Pickering; Cindy Truex; Peggy McAtee; John Messenger
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-06-13       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Pathobiology of cardiac dyssynchrony and resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Uyên Châu Nguyên; Nienke J Verzaal; Frans A van Nieuwenhoven; Kevin Vernooy; Frits W Prinzen
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 5.214

Review 3.  Cardiac resynchronisation therapy in 2015: keeping up with the pace.

Authors:  A Voskoboinik; A D McGavigan; J A Mariani
Journal:  Intern Med J       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.048

4.  Left univentricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy using rate-adaptive atrioventricular delay.

Authors:  Li-Jin Pu; Yu Wang; Lu-Lu Zhao; Tao Guo; Shu-Min Li; Bao-Tong Hua; Ping Yang; Jun Yang; Yan-Zhou Lu; Liu-Qing Yang; Ling Zhao; Hai-Yun Luo
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.327

5.  Haemodynamics, dyspnoea, and pulmonary reserve in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Authors:  Masaru Obokata; Thomas P Olson; Yogesh N V Reddy; Vojtech Melenovsky; Garvan C Kane; Barry A Borlaug
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 29.983

6.  Personalized Rate-Response Programming Improves Exercise Tolerance After 6 Months in People With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices and Heart Failure: A Phase II Study.

Authors:  John Gierula; Judith E Lowry; Maria F Paton; Charlotte A Cole; Rowenna Byrom; Aaron O Koshy; Hemant Chumun; Lorraine C Kearney; Sam Straw; T Scott Bowen; Richard M Cubbon; Anne-Maree Keenan; Deborah D Stocken; Mark T Kearney; Klaus K Witte
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Cardiac output response to exercise in relation to metabolic demand in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Authors:  Muaz M Abudiab; Margaret M Redfield; Vojtech Melenovsky; Thomas P Olson; David A Kass; Bruce D Johnson; Barry A Borlaug
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 15.534

8.  Rate response and cardiac resynchronisation therapy in chronic heart failure: higher cardiac output does not acutely improve exercise performance: a pilot trial.

Authors:  Griet Van Thielen; Bernard P Paelinck; Paul Beckers; Beckers Paul; Christiaan J Vrints; Viviane M A Conraads
Journal:  Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil       Date:  2008-04

9.  Rate-Response Programming Tailored to the Force-Frequency Relationship Improves Exercise Tolerance in Chronic Heart Failure.

Authors:  John Gierula; Maria F Paton; Judith E Lowry; Haqeel A Jamil; Rowenna Byrom; Michael Drozd; Jack O Garnham; Richard M Cubbon; David A Cairns; Mark T Kearney; Klaus K Witte
Journal:  JACC Heart Fail       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 12.035

Review 10.  Chronotropic incompetence: causes, consequences, and management.

Authors:  Peter H Brubaker; Dalane W Kitzman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 39.918

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.