Literature DB >> 18391648

Rate response and cardiac resynchronisation therapy in chronic heart failure: higher cardiac output does not acutely improve exercise performance: a pilot trial.

Griet Van Thielen1, Bernard P Paelinck, Paul Beckers, Beckers Paul, Christiaan J Vrints, Viviane M A Conraads.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rate adaptive pacing (RAP) during cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) might improve exercise capacity through enhanced cardiac output (CO). Conversely, higher heart rates (HR) might set off a blunted force-frequency response (FFR).
METHODS: Fourteen CRT-treated patients (62+/-3 years, left ventricular ejection fraction 30.8+/-2.7%) underwent two cardiopulmonary exercise tests (CPET). CPET1: rate response off; CPET2: rate response on. Conventional and tissue doppler echocardiography were obtained at rest and at peak exercise.
RESULTS: Peak values for HR (106+/-5 vs. 127+/-3 bpm; P=0.001) and CO (6.4+/-0.4 vs. 7.4+/-0.4 l/min/m; P=0.001) increased significantly comparing CPET1 and CPET2. Stroke volume index (28.8+/-1.4 vs. 27.9+/-1.2 ml/m, P=0.2) and peak oxygen consumption (17.8+/-0.9 vs. 17.4+/-0.7 ml/kg/min, P=0.6), however, did not differ. Longitudinal systolic velocities of the basal septum (SSm: 6.9+/-0.9 vs. 6.1+/-0.8 cm/s, P=0.07), basal left lateral (LSm: 6.1+/-1.3 vs. 5.9+/-0.8 cm/s, P=0.3) and basal right ventricular free wall (RVSm: 11.7+/-0.9 vs. 10.1+/-0.7 cm/s, P<0.01) remained unchanged or decreased. Inter-ventricular (Deltat LSm-RVSm) (10+/-18 vs. 15+/-9 ms) and intra-ventricular mechanical delay (Deltat SSm-LSm) (10+/-15 vs. 9+/-6 ms) did not change.
CONCLUSION: RAP resulted in a net increase in CO, without an acute favourable effect on exercise capacity. This finding underscores the importance of peripheral factors (endothelial and skeletal muscle dysfunction) as determinants of exercise capacity in CHF. The fact that longitudinal systolic myocardial velocities at higher HR did not change or even decreased suggests that a blunted FFR still occurs, despite CRT. RAP had no effect on mechanical synchrony.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18391648     DOI: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e3282f19d17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil        ISSN: 1741-8267


  3 in total

Review 1.  Rate adaptive pacing in people with chronic heart failure increases peak heart rate but not peak exercise capacity: a systematic review.

Authors:  H I Clark; M J Pearson; N A Smart
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 2.  Relationships among norepinephrine levels, exercise capacity, and chronotropic responses in heart failure patients.

Authors:  Liza Grosman-Rimon; Evan Wright; Solomon Sabovich; Jordan Rimon; Sagi Gleitman; Doron Sudarsky; Alla Lubovich; Itzhak Gabizon; Spencer D Lalonde; Sharon Tsuk; Michael A McDonald; Vivek Rao; David Gutterman; Ulrich P Jorde; Shemy Carasso; Erez Kachel
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 4.214

3.  Impact of closed loop stimulation on prognostic cardiopulmonary variables in patients with chronic heart failure and severe chronotropic incompetence: a pilot, randomized, crossover study.

Authors:  Joachim Proff; Béla Merkely; Roland Papp; Corinna Lenz; Peter Nordbeck; Christian Butter; Juergen Meyerhoefer; Michael Doering; Dean J MacCarter; Katharina Ingel; Thomas Thouet; Ulf Landmesser; Mattias J Roser
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 5.214

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.