Literature DB >> 35128543

Operationalizing a Rideshare Intervention for Colonoscopy Completion: Barriers, Facilitators, and Process Recommendations.

Ari Bell-Brown1, Lisa Chew2, Bryan J Weiner3, Lisa Strate4, Bryan Balmadrid4, Cara C Lewis5, Peggy Hannon3, John M Inadomi6, Scott D Ramsey1,2, Rachel B Issaka1,4,7.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Transportation is a common barrier to colonoscopy completion for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. The study aims to identify the barriers, facilitators, and process recommendations to implement a rideshare non-emergency medical transportation (NEMT) intervention following colonoscopy completion within a safety-net healthcare setting.
METHODS: We used informal stakeholder engagement, story boards - a novel user-centered design technique, listening sessions and the nominal group technique to identify the barriers, facilitators, and process to implementing a rideshare NEMT program following colonoscopy completion in a large safety-net healthcare system.
RESULTS: Barriers to implementing a rideshare NEMT intervention for colonoscopy completion included: inability to expand an existing NEMT program beyond Medicaid patients and lack of patient chaperones with rideshare NEMT programs. Facilitators included: commercially available rideshare NEMT platforms that were lower cost and had shorter wait times than the alternative of taxis. Operationalizing and implementing a rideshare NEMT intervention in our healthcare system required the following steps: 1) identifying key stakeholders, 2) engaging stakeholder groups in discussion to identify barriers and solutions, 3) obtaining institutional sign-off, 4) developing a process for reviewing and selecting a rideshare NEMT program, 5) executing contracts, 6) developing a standard operating procedure and 7) training clinic staff to use the rideshare platform. DISCUSSION: Rideshare NEMT after procedural sedation is administered may improve colonoscopy completion rates and provide one solution to inadequate CRC screening. If successful, our rideshare model could be broadly applicable to other safety-net health systems, populations with high social needs, and settings where procedural sedation is administered.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colonoscopy; Colorectal Cancer; Non-Emergency Medical Transportation; Screening

Year:  2022        PMID: 35128543      PMCID: PMC8817893          DOI: 10.3389/frhs.2021.799816

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Health Serv        ISSN: 2813-0146


  30 in total

1.  Inadequate Utilization of Diagnostic Colonoscopy Following Abnormal FIT Results in an Integrated Safety-Net System.

Authors:  Rachel B Issaka; Maneesh H Singh; Sachiko M Oshima; Victoria J Laleau; Carly D Rachocki; Ellen H Chen; Lukejohn W Day; Urmimala Sarkar; Ma Somsouk
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion--Healthy People 2010.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nasnewsletter       Date:  2000-05

3.  Reasons for Lack of Diagnostic Colonoscopy After Positive Result on Fecal Immunochemical Test in a Safety-Net Health System.

Authors:  Jason Martin; Ethan A Halm; Jasmin A Tiro; Zahra Merchant; Bijal A Balasubramanian; Katharine McCallister; Joanne M Sanders; Chul Ahn; Wendy Pechero Bishop; Amit G Singal
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 4.965

4.  Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study.

Authors:  J S Mandel; J H Bond; T R Church; D C Snover; G M Bradley; L M Schuman; F Ederer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Analysis of the Effects of a Patient-Centered Rideshare Program on Missed Appointments and Timeliness for MRI Appointments at an Academic Medical Center.

Authors:  Debra S Whorms; Anand K Narayan; Ali Pourvaziri; Randy C Miles; McKinley Glover; Jeremy Herrington; Sanjay Saini; James A Brink; Efren J Flores
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 5.532

6.  Modifiable Failures in the Colorectal Cancer Screening Process and Their Association With Risk of Death.

Authors:  Chyke A Doubeni; Stacey A Fedewa; Theodore R Levin; Christopher D Jensen; Chelsea Saia; Alexis M Zebrowski; Virginia P Quinn; Katharine A Rendle; Ann G Zauber; Tracy A Becerra-Culqui; Shivan J Mehta; Robert H Fletcher; Joanne Schottinger; Douglas A Corley
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Colorectal cancer screening for average-risk North Americans: an economic evaluation.

Authors:  Steven J Heitman; Robert J Hilsden; Flora Au; Scot Dowden; Braden J Manns
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 11.069

Review 8.  What Multilevel Interventions Do We Need to Increase the Colorectal Cancer Screening Rate to 80%?

Authors:  John M Inadomi; Rachel B Issaka; Beverly B Green
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 11.382

9.  Perceptions on Barriers and Facilitators to Colonoscopy Completion After Abnormal Fecal Immunochemical Test Results in a Safety Net System.

Authors:  Rachel B Issaka; Ari Bell-Brown; Cyndy Snyder; Dana L Atkins; Lisa Chew; Bryan J Weiner; Lisa Strate; John M Inadomi; Scott D Ramsey
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-08-02
View more
  2 in total

1.  Barriers associated with inadequate follow-up of abnormal fecal immunochemical test results in a safety-net system: A mixed-methods analysis.

Authors:  Rachel B Issaka; Ari Bell-Brown; Jason Kao; Cyndy Snyder; Dana L Atkins; Lisa D Chew; Bryan J Weiner; Lisa Strate; John M Inadomi; Scott D Ramsey
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2022-05-18

2.  Adapting a Dementia Care Management Intervention for Regional Implementation: A Theory-Based Participatory Barrier Analysis.

Authors:  Katja Seidel; Tina Quasdorf; Julia Haberstroh; Jochen René Thyrian
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 4.614

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.