Literature DB >> 35128317

Machine-vision image guided C4-C5 unilateral cervical pedicle screw insertion: case report and review of literature.

Tiffany Yeretsian1, Carolyn Lai2, Daipayan Guha2, Joel Ramjist3, Victor X D Yang2,3.   

Abstract

Computer-assistance for pedicle screw insertion is becoming increasingly common. As in the case presented below, image guided neuronavigation can be used to improve the accuracy and safety of subaxial cervical pedicle screw placement, given their increased difficulty of cannulation relative to the larger pedicles in the thoracolumbar spine. A 49-year-old man presented with a traumatic sagittal split fracture of C4 (AO Classification type A4) and a left lateral mass fracture of C5 (AO Classification type F1) with anterior depression and 50% height loss. MRI revealed evidence of strain of the interspinous/supraspinous ligaments (AO Classification type B2), as well as fluid within the left C4-C5 facet joint. Along with these fractures, the young patient had Klippel-Feil syndrome with autofusion of the C2-3 posterior elements, and a left vertebral artery dissection. He had neck pain but was otherwise neurologically intact. The patient underwent machine-vision image guided C4-C5 unilateral pedicle screw insertion connected by a fixation rod for stabilization and bone graft to augment the instrumented fusion with good outcome. The use of machine vision spinal navigation was able to provide accurate and precise placement of pedicle screws without significantly increasing surgical time. This method has the potential to allow for the safe and accurate insertion of cervical pedicle screws and to reduce the rate of pedicle breach which could avoid significant neurovascular injury. 2022 AME Case Reports. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Klippel-Feil syndrome; case report; computer-assisted; subaxial cervical spine; unilateral pedicle screw fixation

Year:  2022        PMID: 35128317      PMCID: PMC8762388          DOI: 10.21037/acr-21-62

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AME Case Rep        ISSN: 2523-1995


  20 in total

1.  Improved accuracy of computer-assisted cervical pedicle screw insertion.

Authors:  Yoshihisa Kotani; Kuniyoshi Abumi; Manabu Ito; Akio Minami
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.115

2.  Pedicle screws can be 4 times stronger than lateral mass screws for insertion in the midcervical spine: a biomechanical study on strength of fixation.

Authors:  Zenya Ito; Kosaku Higashino; Satoshi Kato; Sung Soo Kim; Eugene Wong; Katsuhito Yoshioka; William C Hutton
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2014-04

3.  Cervical pedicle screws vs. lateral mass screws: uniplanar fatigue analysis and residual pullout strengths.

Authors:  Todd L Johnston; Eldin E Karaikovic; Eugene P Lautenschlager; David Marcu
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.166

4.  Randomized clinical study to compare the accuracy of navigated and non-navigated thoracic pedicle screws in deformity correction surgeries.

Authors:  S Rajasekaran; S Vidyadhara; Perumal Ramesh; Ajoy P Shetty
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 5.  Comparison of two novel fluoroscopy-based stereotactic methods for cervical pedicle screw placement and review of the literature.

Authors:  M Reinhold; C Bach; L Audigé; R Bale; R Attal; M Blauth; F Magerl
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Comparison of radiation exposure in lumbar pedicle screw placement with fluoroscopy vs computer-assisted image guidance with intraoperative three-dimensional imaging.

Authors:  Harvey E Smith; Matthew D Welsch; Rick C Sasso; Alexander R Vaccaro
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.985

7.  Spinal fusion in the United States: analysis of trends from 1998 to 2008.

Authors:  Sean S Rajaee; Hyun W Bae; Linda E A Kanim; Rick B Delamarter
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Intraoperative, full-rotation, three-dimensional image (O-arm)-based navigation system for cervical pedicle screw insertion.

Authors:  Yoshimoto Ishikawa; Tokumi Kanemura; Go Yoshida; Akiyuki Matsumoto; Zenya Ito; Ryoji Tauchi; Akio Muramoto; Shuichiro Ohno; Yusuke Nishimura
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2011-07-15

9.  Economic evaluation comparing intraoperative cone beam CT-based navigation and conventional fluoroscopy for the placement of spinal pedicle screws: a patient-level data cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Nicolas Dea; Charles G Fisher; Juliet Batke; Jason Strelzow; Daniel Mendelsohn; Scott J Paquette; Brian K Kwon; Michael D Boyd; Marcel F S Dvorak; John T Street
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 4.166

10.  High Speed, High Density Intraoperative 3D Optical Topographical Imaging with Efficient Registration to MRI and CT for Craniospinal Surgical Navigation.

Authors:  Raphael Jakubovic; Daipayan Guha; Shaurya Gupta; Michael Lu; Jamil Jivraj; Beau A Standish; Michael K Leung; Adrian Mariampillai; Kenneth Lee; Peter Siegler; Patryk Skowron; Hamza Farooq; Nhu Nguyen; Joseph Alarcon; Ryan Deorajh; Joel Ramjist; Michael Ford; Peter Howard; Nicolas Phan; Leo da Costa; Chris Heyn; Gamaliel Tan; Rajeesh George; David W Cadotte; Todd Mainprize; Albert Yee; Victor X D Yang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.