Marissa R Mirecki1, Sarah Callahan2, Kyle M Condon3, Edelle C Field-Fote3,4,5. 1. Shepherd Center- Crawford Research Institute, Atlanta, GA, USA. marissa.mirecki@shepherd.org. 2. Children's Hospital of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA. 3. Shepherd Center- Crawford Research Institute, Atlanta, GA, USA. 4. Division of Physical Therapy, Emory University- School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA. 5. Program in Applied Physiology, Georgia Institute of Technology- School of Biological Sciences, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Pre-post design; before and after vibration intervention. OBJECTIVES: To explore effect of a focal, self-applied upper extremity (UE) vibration intervention on UE spasticity for individuals with tetraplegia. The secondary objectives were to explore the acceptability and ease of use of this intervention. SETTING: Specialty rehabilitation center in Georgia, USA. METHODS: Eleven participants each completed one session of focal, self-applied vibration to the UEs. UE spasticity was measured using the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS). UE function was measured using the Box & Block (B&B) test which measures the effectiveness of grasp, transport, and release. These measurements were taken pre-intervention, immediately post-intervention, and 20 min post-intervention. Participants also self-reported the acceptability and usability of the intervention, their perception of change in their spasticity and completed the Qualities of Spasticity Questionnaire. RESULTS: In the full group analysis of the spasticity measures, no significant effects were found. Subgroup analysis, however, indicated participants with higher spasticity demonstrated significantly more change on the MAS than the lower spasticity group. Analysis did not reveal any impact of the intervention on UE function as measured by the B&B. Ten out of eleven participants indicated that they agreed or strongly agreed that the intervention would be valuable to have at home. CONCLUSIONS: Participants with higher spasticity demonstrated decreased spasticity after focal UE vibration, although there was no clear effect on grasp, transport and release function. Participants were satisfied with the intervention; most were able to use it independently and indicated it would be a valuable home intervention.
STUDY DESIGN: Pre-post design; before and after vibration intervention. OBJECTIVES: To explore effect of a focal, self-applied upper extremity (UE) vibration intervention on UE spasticity for individuals with tetraplegia. The secondary objectives were to explore the acceptability and ease of use of this intervention. SETTING: Specialty rehabilitation center in Georgia, USA. METHODS: Eleven participants each completed one session of focal, self-applied vibration to the UEs. UE spasticity was measured using the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS). UE function was measured using the Box & Block (B&B) test which measures the effectiveness of grasp, transport, and release. These measurements were taken pre-intervention, immediately post-intervention, and 20 min post-intervention. Participants also self-reported the acceptability and usability of the intervention, their perception of change in their spasticity and completed the Qualities of Spasticity Questionnaire. RESULTS: In the full group analysis of the spasticity measures, no significant effects were found. Subgroup analysis, however, indicated participants with higher spasticity demonstrated significantly more change on the MAS than the lower spasticity group. Analysis did not reveal any impact of the intervention on UE function as measured by the B&B. Ten out of eleven participants indicated that they agreed or strongly agreed that the intervention would be valuable to have at home. CONCLUSIONS: Participants with higher spasticity demonstrated decreased spasticity after focal UE vibration, although there was no clear effect on grasp, transport and release function. Participants were satisfied with the intervention; most were able to use it independently and indicated it would be a valuable home intervention.
Authors: A D Pandyan; M Gregoric; M P Barnes; D Wood; F Van Wijck; J Burridge; H Hermens; G R Johnson Journal: Disabil Rehabil Date: 2005 Jan 7-21 Impact factor: 3.033
Authors: Stephen Estes; Jennifer A Iddings; Somu Ray; Neva J Kirk-Sanchez; Edelle C Field-Fote Journal: Neurotherapeutics Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 7.620