Literature DB >> 29959653

Comparison of Single-Session Dose Response Effects of Whole Body Vibration on Spasticity and Walking Speed in Persons with Spinal Cord Injury.

Stephen Estes1, Jennifer A Iddings1, Somu Ray1, Neva J Kirk-Sanchez2, Edelle C Field-Fote3,4,5.   

Abstract

Spasticity affects approximately 65% of persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) and negatively impacts function and quality of life. Whole body vibration (WBV) appears to reduce spasticity and improve walking function; however, the optimal dose (frequency/duration) is not known. We compared single-session effects of four different WBV frequency/duration dose conditions on spasticity and walking speed, in preparation for a planned multi-session study. Thirty-five participants with motor-incomplete SCI received four different doses of WBV: high frequency (50 Hz)/short duration (180 s), high frequency/long duration (360 s), low frequency (30 Hz)/short duration, and low frequency/long duration, plus a control intervention consisting of sham electrical stimulation. In all conditions, participants stood on the WBV platform for 45-s bouts with 1 min rest between bouts until the requisite duration was achieved. The frequency/duration dose order was randomized across participants; sessions were separated by at least 1 week. Quadriceps spasticity was measured using the pendulum test at four time points during each session: before, immediately after, 15 min after, and 45 min after WBV. Walking speed was quantified using the 10-m walk test at three time points during each session: baseline, immediately after, and 45 min after WBV. In the full group analysis, no frequency/duration combination was significantly different from the sham-control condition. In participants with more severe spasticity, a greater reduction in stretch reflex excitability was associated with the high frequency/long duration WBV condition. The sham-control condition was associated with effects, indicating that the activity of repeated sitting and standing may have a beneficial influence on spasticity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02340910 (assigned 01/19/2015).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Afferent input; Hyperreflexia; Oscillation; Pendulum test; Stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29959653      PMCID: PMC6095785          DOI: 10.1007/s13311-018-0644-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurotherapeutics        ISSN: 1878-7479            Impact factor:   7.620


  37 in total

1.  Low-frequency H-reflex depression in trained human soleus after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Richard K Shields; Shauna Dudley-Javoroski; Preeti Deshpande Oza
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Are spinal "presynaptic" inhibitory mechanisms suppressed in spasticity?

Authors:  D Burke; P Ashby
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 3.181

Review 3.  Non-pharmacological interventions for spasticity in adults: An overview of systematic reviews.

Authors:  Fary Khan; Bhasker Amatya; Djamel Bensmail; Alain Yelnik
Journal:  Ann Phys Rehabil Med       Date:  2017-10-16

4.  Antispasmodic medications may be associated with reduced recovery during inpatient rehabilitation after traumatic spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Eric R Theriault; Vincent Huang; Gale Whiteneck; Marcel P Dijkers; Noam Y Harel
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 1.985

5.  Depression of involuntary activity in muscles paralyzed by spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Jane E Butler; Sharlene Godfrey; Christine K Thomas
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.217

6.  Prevalence and Effect of Problematic Spasticity After Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Kaila A Holtz; Rachel Lipson; Vanessa K Noonan; Brian K Kwon; Patricia B Mills
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2016-10-22       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  Efficacy and safety of tizanidine in the treatment of spasticity in patients with spinal cord injury. North American Tizanidine Study Group.

Authors:  P W Nance; J Bugaresti; K Shellenberger; W Sheremata; A Martinez-Arizala
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  Segmental reflex pathways in spinal shock and spinal spasticity in man.

Authors:  P Ashby; M Verrier; E Lightfoot
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1974-12       Impact factor: 10.154

9.  Comparison of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and functional electrical stimulation (FES) for spasticity in spinal cord injury - A pilot randomized cross-over trial.

Authors:  Anjali Sivaramakrishnan; John M Solomon; Natarajan Manikandan
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 1.985

10.  Further observations on the depression of group Ia facilitation of motoneurons by vibration in man.

Authors:  P Ashby; E Stålberg; T Winkler; J P Hunter
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  4 in total

1.  A "Snapshot" of the Advances in SCI Therapeutics.

Authors:  Mar Cortes; Guillermo Garcia Alias; Keith E Tansey
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 7.620

2.  Acceptability and impact on spasticity of a single session of upper extremity vibration in individuals with tetraplegia.

Authors:  Marissa R Mirecki; Sarah Callahan; Kyle M Condon; Edelle C Field-Fote
Journal:  Spinal Cord Ser Cases       Date:  2022-02-05

3.  Effects of Skin Stimulation on Sensory-Motor Networks Excitability: Possible Implications for Physical Training in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.

Authors:  Marco Ceccanti; Chiara Cambieri; Laura Libonati; Giorgio Tartaglia; Federica Moret; Matteo Garibaldi; Maurizio Inghilleri
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 4.086

4.  Vibration attenuates spasm-like activity in humans with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Bradley A DeForest; Jorge Bohorquez; Monica A Perez
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 5.182

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.