Literature DB >> 24651209

Localized 100 Hz vibration improves function and reduces upper limb spasticity: a double-blind controlled study.

R Casale1, C Damiani, R Maestri, C Fundarò, P Chimento, C Foti.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Physical modalities such as vibration has been suggested as possible non-pharmacological way to control spasticity. AIMS: The hypotheses tested were: 1) can a selective vibration of the upper limb flexor antagonist, triceps brachii, reduce the spasticity of the flexor biceps brachii muscle; 2) is its association with physiotherapy better than physiotherapy alone in reducing spasticity and improving function, 3) can this possible effect last for longer than the stimulation period.
DESIGN: Randomized double-blind study.
SETTING: Rehabilitation Institute, inward patients. POPULATION: Thirty hemiplegic patients affected by upper limb spasticity.
METHOD: (VIB + PT) group received physiotherapy plus vibration by means of a pneumatic vibrator applied over the belly of the triceps brachii of the spastic side (contact surface 2 cm2; frequency 100 Hz; amplitude 2 mm; mean pressure 250 mBar). (SHAM + PT) group received physiotherapy and sham vibration. Both groups had 60 minutes of physiotherapy (Kabat techniques) for 5 days a week (from Monday to Friday) for 2 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Ashworth modified scale for spasticity and robot-aided motor tasks changes for functional modifications were evaluated before starting treatment (T0), 48 hours after the fifth session (T1) and 48 hours after the last session (T2).
RESULTS: Fisher's exact test showed a statistically significant greater improvements in the (VIB + PT) group (P=0.0001) compared to in the (SHAM + PT) group after 1 week, as well as after 2 weeks of treatment (P=0.0078) at the Ashworth scale.
CONCLUSION: 1) 100 Hz vibration applied to the triceps brachii of a spastic upper limb in association with physiotherapy is able to reduce the spasticity of the flexor agonist, biceps brachii; 2) this association is better than physiotherapy alone in controlling spasticity and improving function; 3) this clinically perceivable reduction of spasticity and function improvement extends (for at least 48 hours) beyond the period of application of the vibration, supporting its possible role in the rehabilitation of spastic hemiplegia. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: 100 Hz antagonist muscle vibration, a non-pharmacological treatment, can help physiotherapy to reduce flexors spasticity and improve functions in the rehabilitation of upper limb spasticity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24651209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Phys Rehabil Med        ISSN: 1973-9087            Impact factor:   2.874


  7 in total

1.  Local Application of Vibration in Motor Rehabilitation - Scientific and Practical Considerations.

Authors:  Daniela Poenaru; Delia Cinteza; Irina Petrusca; Liliana Cioc; Dan Dumitrascu
Journal:  Maedica (Bucur)       Date:  2016-09

2.  Acceptability and impact on spasticity of a single session of upper extremity vibration in individuals with tetraplegia.

Authors:  Marissa R Mirecki; Sarah Callahan; Kyle M Condon; Edelle C Field-Fote
Journal:  Spinal Cord Ser Cases       Date:  2022-02-05

3.  Influence of 40 Hz and 100 Hz Vibration on SH-SY5Y Cells Growth and Differentiation-A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Patrycja Grosman-Dziewiszek; Benita Wiatrak; Wojciech Dziewiszek; Paulina Jawień; Remigiusz Mydlikowski; Romuald Bolejko; Marta Szandruk-Bender; Ewa Karuga-Kuźniewska; Adam Szeląg
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 4.927

4.  User Participatory Design of a Wearable Focal Vibration Device for Home-Based Stroke Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Hongwu Wang; Mustafa Ghazi; Raghuveer Chandrashekhar; Josiah Rippetoe; Grace A Duginski; Louis V Lepak; Lisa R Milhan; Shirley A James
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 3.847

5.  Effects of different vibration frequencies on spinal cord reflex circuits and thermoalgesic perception.

Authors:  Hatice Kumru; Sergiu Albu; Semra Oguz; Narda Murillo; Giuseppe Lucente; Josep Valls-Sole
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.041

6.  Is two better than one? Muscle vibration plus robotic rehabilitation to improve upper limb spasticity and function: A pilot randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Rocco Salvatore Calabrò; Antonino Naro; Margherita Russo; Demetrio Milardi; Antonino Leo; Serena Filoni; Antonia Trinchera; Placido Bramanti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Can muscle vibration be the future in the treatment of cerebral palsy-related drooling? A feasibility study.

Authors:  Emanuele F Russo; Rocco S Calabrò; Patrizio Sale; Filomena Vergura; Maria C De Cola; Angela Militi; Placido Bramanti; Simona Portaro; Serena Filoni
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 3.738

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.