Literature DB >> 35122501

Five-year follow-up of corneal morphology and corneal refractive power changes after uneventful DMEK.

Apostolos Lazaridis1, Bogdan Spiru2, Elefterios Giallouros2, Walter Sekundo2, Frank Michael Schroeder2, Anke Messerschmidt-Roth2, Konstantinos Droutsas2,3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate changes of corneal thickness spatial profile (CTSP), corneal volume (CV) distribution, and total corneal refractive power (TCRP) over a course of 60 months after uneventful Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).
METHODS: In our prospective, comparative study, sixty DMEK cases without intraoperative and postoperative complications and with complete 60-month follow-up were included (group 1). CTSP at corneal apex (CCT) and at 2 mm, 4 mm, 6 mm, and 8 mm rings, CV in 3 mm, 5 mm, 7 mm, and 10 mm zones, and TCRF in 2 mm, 4 mm 6 mm, and 8 mm zones were evaluated preoperatively and at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 60 months postoperatively. The 60-month results were compared to an age-matched group of uncomplicated pseudophakic eyes (group 2; n = 20).
RESULTS: The CCT and CTSP at 2, 4, and 6 mm increased significantly at 60 months compared to 3-month outcomes (P < 0.001). Similarly, CV increased significantly in 3 mm, 5 mm, and 7 mm zones at 60 months compared to 3 months outcomes (P < 0.001). The TCRP showed in all zones a significant decrease at 3 months (P < 0.001) followed by a continuous and significant increase at 60 months (P < 0.001). The 60-month CCT and CTSP at 2 mm were similar to group 2 (P ≥ 0.094).
CONCLUSION: Sixty months after uneventful DMEK, CT within the central 2 mm zone and CV at 3 mm zone were similar to uncomplicated pseudophakic eyes. A continuous and statistically significant increase of TCRP was observed in all measured zones after the 3-month examination.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Corneal thickness; DMEK; Power; Tomography; Volume

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35122501     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-022-05571-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  29 in total

1.  Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty versus descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Theofilos Tourtas; Kathrin Laaser; Bjoern O Bachmann; Claus Cursiefen; Friedrich E Kruse
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  Two-Year Clinical Outcome of 500 Consecutive Cases Undergoing Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.

Authors:  Jorge Peraza-Nieves; Lamis Baydoun; Isabel Dapena; Abbas Ilyas; Laurence E Frank; Salvatore Luceri; Lisanne Ham; Silke Oellerich; Gerrit R J Melles
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.651

Review 3.  Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty versus descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Leru Zhu; Yi Zha; Jianqiu Cai; Yanling Zhang
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  Visual Outcomes After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Versus Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty-Comparison of Specific Matched Pairs.

Authors:  Konstantinos Droutsas; Apostolos Lazaridis; Dimitrios Papaconstantinou; Dimitrios Brouzas; Marilita M Moschos; Stephan Schulze; Walter Sekundo
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.651

5.  Incidence and Clinical Course of Immune Reactions after Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: Retrospective Analysis of 1000 Consecutive Eyes.

Authors:  Deniz Hos; Onur Tuac; Friederike Schaub; Tisha P Stanzel; Silvia Schrittenlocher; Martin Hellmich; Björn O Bachmann; Claus Cursiefen
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 6.  Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Versus Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty/Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty.

Authors:  Abhimanyu Singh; Mehran Zarei-Ghanavati; Venkata Avadhanam; Christopher Liu
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.651

7.  Contralateral eye comparison of descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty and descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Yakov Goldich; Mahmood Showail; Noa Avni-Zauberman; Mauricio Perez; Randall Ulate; Uri Elbaz; David S Rootman
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 5.258

Review 8.  Determinants of visual quality after endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Andrew M J Turnbull; Michael Tsatsos; Parwez N Hossain; David F Anderson
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 6.048

9.  Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: learning curve of a single surgeon.

Authors:  Konstantinos Droutsas; Eleftherios Giallouros; Gerrit R J Melles; Klio Chatzistefanou; Walter Sekundo
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.651

Review 10.  Efficacy and safety of Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty versus Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Saiqun Li; Liangping Liu; Wei Wang; Ting Huang; Xingwu Zhong; Jin Yuan; Lingyi Liang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.