Literature DB >> 28094043

Incidence and Clinical Course of Immune Reactions after Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: Retrospective Analysis of 1000 Consecutive Eyes.

Deniz Hos1, Onur Tuac2, Friederike Schaub2, Tisha P Stanzel3, Silvia Schrittenlocher2, Martin Hellmich4, Björn O Bachmann2, Claus Cursiefen5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To analyze the incidence and clinical course of graft rejection episodes after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of a consecutive, interventional case series. PARTICIPANTS: One thousand eyes that underwent DMEK from July 2011 through August 2015 at the Department of Ophthalmology, University of Cologne.
METHODS: All cases with follow-up of at least 1 month were included (mean follow-up, 18.5 months). Patients with a graft rejection episode were followed up for 1 additional year. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of graft rejection, best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), central corneal thickness (CCT), endothelial cell density (ECD), and need for regraft.
RESULTS: Nine hundred five cases met the inclusion criteria. A graft rejection episode developed in 12 patients (estimated probability of rejection at 1 year, 0.9%; at 2 years, 2.3%; at 4 years, 2.3%). At time of rejection, 9 of 12 patients had stopped corticosteroids. Five patients were symptomatic and 7 did not note the rejection episode. Intensified topical corticosteroid therapy was started immediately after diagnosis of rejection. Two eyes decompensated and required a regraft, whereas the remaining 10 eyes required no regraft (BSCVA, 0.27±0.28 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]; CCT, 554.1±39.1 μm at last visit before rejection vs. BSCVA, 0.21±0.15 logMAR; CCT, 540.0±15.0 μm 3 months after rejection). One year after the rejection episodes, BSCVA and CCT in these eyes remained unchanged when compared with the last visit before rejection (BSCVA, 0.15±0.11 logMAR; CCT, 533.8±26.0 μm). Significant changes were observed for ECD values (1741±274.5 cells/mm2 at last visit before rejection vs. 1356±380.3 cells/mm2 after 3 months [P = 0.04] and 1290±359.0 cells/mm2 after 1 year [P = 0.01]).
CONCLUSIONS: The risk for graft rejection after DMEK is low, and an even smaller minority requires a regraft. After intensified local corticosteroid therapy, most patients show stable visual acuity and CCT, although ECD decreases. The occurrence of immune reactions up to 2 years after surgery predominantly in patients not receiving corticosteroids supports the prolonged use of corticosteroids after DMEK.
Copyright © 2017 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28094043     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.12.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  20 in total

1.  Midterm follow-up of immune reactions after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).

Authors:  Friederike Schaub; Björn O Bachmann; Claus Cursiefen; Deniz Hos
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-05-18       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 2.  [10 years of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty in Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy : What have we learned?]

Authors:  M Matthaei; S Schrittenlocher; D Hos; S Siebelmann; F Bucher; F Schaub; R Hoerster; R Siggel; S Roters; L M Heindl; B Bachmann; C Cursiefen
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 3.  [Technique of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) : Video article].

Authors:  M Matthaei; B Bachmann; S Siebelmann; C Cursiefen
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 4.  [Unmet research and developmental needs in ophthalmology : A consensus-based road map of the European Vision Institute for 2019-2025].

Authors:  C Cursiefen; F Cordeiro; J Cunha-Vaz; T Wheeler-Schilling; H P N Scholl
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  Five-year follow-up of corneal morphology and corneal refractive power changes after uneventful DMEK.

Authors:  Apostolos Lazaridis; Bogdan Spiru; Elefterios Giallouros; Walter Sekundo; Frank Michael Schroeder; Anke Messerschmidt-Roth; Konstantinos Droutsas
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-02-05       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Mechanotransductive Differentiation of Hair Follicle Stem Cells Derived from Aged Eyelid Skin into Corneal Endothelial-Like Cells.

Authors:  Christian Olszewski; Jessika Maassen; Rebecca Guenther; Claudia Skazik-Voogt; Angela Gutermuth
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 6.692

7.  Negative impact of dextran in organ culture media for pre-stripped tissue preservation on DMEK (Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty) outcome.

Authors:  Alaadin Abdin; Loay Daas; Max Pattmöller; Shady Suffo; Achim Langenbucher; Berthold Seitz
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Optical characteristics after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: 1-year results.

Authors:  Takahiko Hayashi; Akira Kobayashi; Hidenori Takahashi; Itaru Oyakawa; Naoko Kato; Takefumi Yamaguchi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Long-Term Observation and Sequencing Analysis of SKPs-Derived Corneal Endothelial Cell-Like Cells for Treating Corneal Endothelial Dysfunction.

Authors:  Lin Shen; Peng Sun; Liqun Du; Jing Zhu; Chengqun Ju; Hui Guo; Xinyi Wu
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 4.064

10.  Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) rejection following COVID-19 infection: A case report.

Authors:  Karen Bitton; Mathieu Dubois; Romain Courtin; Christophe Panthier; Damien Gatinel
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep       Date:  2021-06-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.