Literature DB >> 28410548

Two-Year Clinical Outcome of 500 Consecutive Cases Undergoing Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.

Jorge Peraza-Nieves1, Lamis Baydoun, Isabel Dapena, Abbas Ilyas, Laurence E Frank, Salvatore Luceri, Lisanne Ham, Silke Oellerich, Gerrit R J Melles.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical outcome of 500 consecutive cases up to 2 years after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and to assess which parameters may have influenced the clinical outcome.
METHODS: From a group of 500 eyes (393 patients), which underwent DMEK for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD), bullous keratopathy, failed corneal transplants and other indications, clinical outcomes [best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central endothelial cell density (ECD), and central corneal thickness] were evaluated before, and at 6, 12, and 24 months after DMEK and postoperative complications were documented.
RESULTS: At 12 months postoperatively, 81% of eyes reached a BCVA of ≥20/25 (≥0.8), 49% ≥20/20 (≥1.0), and 15% ≥20/18 (≥1.2) (n = 396) and remained stable up to 24 months (P = 0.828). Compared with preoperative ECD, mean postoperative ECD decreased by 37 (±18)%, 40 (±18)%, and 45 (±18)% at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively (P < 0.05 for all time points). Surgery indication and graft attachment status were related to postoperative BCVA and ECD results. Eyes with FECD and attached grafts showed better BCVA outcomes and higher ECD (P < 0.05). Central corneal thickness decreased by 20 (±11)% to 525 (±46) μm from preoperative to 6 months postoperatively and remained stable thereafter (P > 0.05). Within the study period, retransplantation was required in 32 eyes (6.4%). Principal longer-term complications were secondary graft failure (1.4%) and allograft rejection (1.4%).
CONCLUSIONS: Clinical outcomes remain excellent up to 2 years after DMEK, in particular for eyes operated on for FECD and with completely attached grafts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28410548     DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001176

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cornea        ISSN: 0277-3740            Impact factor:   2.651


  21 in total

1.  Vulnerability of corneal endothelial cells to mechanical trauma from indentation forces assessed using contact mechanics and fluorescence microscopy.

Authors:  Manuel A Ramirez-Garcia; Yousuf M Khalifa; Mark R Buckley
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 3.467

2.  Donor, Recipient, and Operative Factors Associated With Increased Endothelial Cell Loss in the Cornea Preservation Time Study.

Authors:  Jonathan H Lass; Beth Ann Benetz; Sanjay V Patel; Loretta B Szczotka-Flynn; Robert O'Brien; Allison R Ayala; Maureen G Maguire; Yassine J Daoud; Mark A Greiner; Sadeer B Hannush; W Barry Lee; Thomas F Mauger; Harry J Menegay; Mark D Mifflin; Michael B Raizman; Jennifer Rose-Nussbaumer; Robert L Schultze; Gregory A Schmidt; Alan Sugar; Mark A Terry; David D Verdier
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 7.389

3.  Corneal densitometry patterns in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty and Descemet stripping automated keratoplasty.

Authors:  Jorge Peraza-Nieves; José-María Sánchez-González; Carlos Rocha-de-Lossada; Rahul Rachwani-Anil; Miriam Sánchez-Valera; Davide Borroni; Josep Torras-Sanvicens
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 4.  Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy and corneal endothelial diseases: East meets West.

Authors:  Y Q Soh; Viridiana Kocaba; Mauricio Pinto; Jodhbir S Mehta
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Risk and Impact of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infection on Corneal Transplantation: A Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Harry Levine; Paula A Sepulveda-Beltran; Diego S Altamirano; Alfonso L Sabater; Sander R Dubovy; Harry W Flynn; Guillermo Amescua
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.651

6.  Five-year follow-up of corneal morphology and corneal refractive power changes after uneventful DMEK.

Authors:  Apostolos Lazaridis; Bogdan Spiru; Elefterios Giallouros; Walter Sekundo; Frank Michael Schroeder; Anke Messerschmidt-Roth; Konstantinos Droutsas
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-02-05       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty in eyes with COL8A2-associated corneal dystrophy.

Authors:  Daliya Dzhaber; Michael J Fliotsos; Mya Abousy; Swarupa Kancherla; Sepideh Siadati; Charles G Eberhart; John D Gottsch; Allen O Eghrari
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep       Date:  2022-04-27

8.  "Endothelium-Out" and "Endothelium-In" Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) Graft Insertion Techniques: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Hon Shing Ong; Hla M Htoon; Marcus Ang; Jodhbir S Mehta
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-14

9.  Outcomes of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty in Bangkok, Thailand.

Authors:  Kaevalin Lekhanont; Punyanuch Pisitpayat; Nontawat Cheewaruangroj; Passara Jongkhajornpong; Manachai Nonpassopon; Thunyarat Anothaisintawee
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-05-31

10.  Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty versus Descemet Stripping Automated Keratoplasty - Outcome of One Single Surgeon's More Than 200 Initial Consecutive Cases.

Authors:  Christina Jansen; Madeleine Zetterberg
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-03-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.