Literature DB >> 6878706

Palpable breast masses: evaluation by high frequency, hand-held real-time sonography and xeromammography. Work in progress.

A C Fleischer, C A Muhletaler, V H Reynolds, J E Machin, G A Thieme, A L Bundy, A C Winfield, A E James.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic virtues and limitations of the combined use of high frequency, real-time ultrasound scanning (US) using hand-held transducers and xeromammography (XM) in the evaluation of palpable breast masses. Seventy-one patients, who ranged in age from 14 to 88 years and who had histologically proved masses, were examined by both imaging modalities. US demonstrated the highest degree of accuracy in establishing the presence of cysts (96%) and fibroadenomas (89%). XM afforded better overall depiction of the breast and correctly identified seven carcinomas, five of which were prospectively diagnosed by sonography. When all types of breast masses were considered, the combined use of XM and US was more accurate (89%) than when either XM (70%) or US (85%) was used alone. For this reason, a combined approach using both modalities in the examination of most patients with palpable breast masses is advocated. The advantages and limitations of both XM and US in the evaluation of palpable masses are discussed and illustrated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6878706     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.148.3.6878706

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  6 in total

Review 1.  The use of ultrasound in benign breast disorders.

Authors:  P B Guyer
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1989 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  A comparison between ultrasonography and mammography, computed tomography and digital subtraction angiography for the detection of breast cancers.

Authors:  N Tohnosu; K Okuyama; Y Koide; T Kikuchi; T Awano; H Matsubara; T Sano; H Nakaichi; Y Funami; K Matsushita
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  The accuracy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of breast disease.

Authors:  J A Smallwood; P Guyer; K Dewbury; S Mengatti; A Herbert; G T Royle; I Taylor
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  How accurate is ultrasound in evaluating palpable breast masses?

Authors:  Mubuuke Aloysius Gonzaga
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2010-09-02

5.  Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of breast imaging in the detection of cancer.

Authors:  L E Duijm; G L Guit; J O Zaat; A R Koomen; D Willebrand
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Use of ultrasound localization to improve results of fine needle aspiration cytology of breast masses.

Authors:  J J Patel; P C Gartell; P B Guyer; A Herbert; I Taylor
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 18.000

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.