Literature DB >> 35117564

Quality-of-life evaluation in patients with laryngotracheal diseases.

Benoit Jacques Bibas1, Paulo Francisco Guerreiro Cardoso1, Helio Minamoto1, Paulo Manoel Pêgo-Fernandes1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 35117564      PMCID: PMC8797603          DOI: 10.21037/tcr.2020.02.60

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Cancer Res        ISSN: 2218-676X            Impact factor:   1.241


× No keyword cloud information.

Introduction

Health-related quality of life (HRQL) is a brad concept, but in general terms depicts the self-reported physical and mental condition of an individual. This is a consequence not only of the disease, but also of the environmental conditions that surrounds the life of the patient (1). HRQL instruments are a fundamental part of patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs). This type of analysis has gained widespread attention, and is a quintessential component of modern outcome assessment (2). Benign laryngo, or laryngo-tracheal stenosis (LTS) may be defined in several manners. Still, there must be some degree of airway stricture at the level of the glottis, subglottis, or trachea (3). It is not merely an anatomical structural deformity that can be defined by its extension, diameter, and distance from the closest anatomic landmark, such as the vocal folds or the tracheal carina. LTS is a complex condition in its etiology, natural history, and clinical outcome. It may derive from various clinical entities, such as iatrogenic airway injuries (i.e., postintubation, post-tracheostomy), autoimmune diseases (i.e., Granulomatosis with polyangiitis, relapsing polychondritis, sarcoidosis, amyloidosis), congenital, primary and secondary neoplastic diseases, and idiopathic (4,5). As consequence, patients usually experience dyspnea, stridor dysphonia, dysphagia, and in severe cases, phonation ablation (1,4-8). Furthermore, many patients will have a tracheostomy placed during an exacerbation event. At our institution, approximately 80% of the patients referred to us have an indwelling tracheostomy (4-8). This is known to have a severe negative impact in self-esteem and a substantial decrease in the overall quality-of-life perception (9,10). In our clinical practice, patients exhibit difficulties in daily tasks, such as talking on the phone or having a simple conversation, and are reluctant to engage in social activities. Furthermore, patient`s ability to retain and acquire jobs are also deeply, ultimately causing social and financial problems to themselves and their caretakers. Several groups have used specific health-related questionnaires to analyze patients with LTS. Most of them have studied the overall HRQL, but voice and dyspnea are also subject of attention.

Overall HRQL

Our group (1) prospective evaluated adult patients with benign tracheal or LTS treated with Montgomery T-tubes, Dumon silicone stents or tracheostomy. HRQL was evaluated using the SF 36 Health Survey. The SF-36 norm-based results for the entire cohort were compared with random standardized control population. Of all 8 domains studied, only one (Vitality) actually scored in the mean of the control population. All other domains (physical Function and mental) were poorly scored and were placed 1 standard deviation below the mean, or 2 standard deviations below the mean. Both summaries, physical and mental, were 1 standard deviation below the mean. The conclusion of our study was that patients with tracheal stenosis have a poor quality-of-life. This impairment is noticeable in physical activities, as expected, but also in the mental state of the individuals. The severity of the stenosis seems to correlate well with the worsening HRQL. Naunheim et al. (2) analyzed patients with idiopathic stenosis and correlated the severity of the disease with pulmonary function tests and four different HRQL scores (EQ-5D; RAND 36-Item Health Survey; Clinical COPD Questionnaire; and the Airway, Dyspnea, Voice, and Swallowing Summary Assessment). The study demonstrated through univariate analysis demonstrated that the four instruments had a significant correlation with the lung function tests, either as an aggregate score (ED-5D and CCQ) or along several domain scores (RAND-36 and ADVS). This impairment seems to be reduced when the tracheal stenosis is surgically corrected. Wray et al. (11) evaluated 42 children with long-segment LTS submitted to slide tracheoplasty. HRQL was evaluated with a generic questionnaire (PedsQL4.0) after surgical reconstruction of the airway, and scores did not differ from healthy controls. Another study (3) indicated that over a 5-year time horizon, open reconstruction (cricotracheal/tracheal resection) had a higher cost but greater quality-adjusted life year, which resulted in a cost-effective result at the predetermined willingness-to-pay threshold. As compared with endoscopic dilations, open reconstruction had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of U$896 per quality-adjusted life year. When extended to a 10-year time horizon, open reconstruction had a lower cost and produced a greater quality-adjusted life year, thus dominating the alternative of endoscopic dilation.

Voice-related quality of life

Since many patients with tracheal stenosis have dysphonia, and sometimes complete phonation ablation, the impact of the voice quality in the overall quality of life has been subject of investigation. Several groups have addressed this issue and tried to quantify the impact of the voice in the overall perception of the individual. Hillel and colleagues (12) conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent balloon dilation for LTS. Preoperative and postoperative voice outcomes were analyzed before and after the procedure with a specific questionnaire (V-RQOL). This questionnaire is a validated disease-specific quality-of-life instrument that allows patients to rate their own self-perceived voice quality. Endoscopic dilation improved voice from a mean of 70.4 to 80.0 postoperatively (P=0.025). The same group (13) later on evaluated a small group of 13 patients with LTS treated with Montgomery T-Tubes. The primary outcome was to measure voice outcomes using V-RQOL scores in patients before and after Montgomery T-tube placement. The average calculated V-RQOL score between initial scores and those post-operatively was 43.5 to 79 (P<0.05), with improvement in the post T-tube score compared to the pre-placement score. Furthermore, 5 patients (38%) went from aphonia to voicing. As a downside, two patients had a worse calculated V-RQOL following T-tube placement. Fiorelli et al. (14) performed a similar study, but in patients with tracheomalacia. Eleven individuals were evaluated and V-RQOL scores measured pre and post Montgomery silicone T-Tube placement. Stent placement resulted in significant improvement in social/emotional (39.2±6.1 vs. 66.8±1.9; P=0.0001); physical functioning (21±5.7 vs. 56.4±5.3; P=0.0001) and total V-RQOL scores (33.9±5.4 vs. 61.3±6.1; P=0.0001) after T-tube insertion, with a very low complication rate. This confirms that T-Tube placement is safe, can provide good phonation, and should be attempted whenever possible, even when definitive tracheal reconstruction is not amenable.

Dyspnea-related quality of life

One recent case series (15) included 14 patients that were evaluated with the V-RQOL, Dyspnea Index, and Clinical COPD Questionnaire, before and after endoscopic surgery. There was significant difference in dyspnea after endoscopic surgery, as demonstrated by both indexes. Dyspnea Index (n=14) decreased from 26.9 to 6.6 (mean of difference, −20.3; 95% CI, −27.9 to −12.7); COPD Questionnaire score decreased from 3.2 to 1.0 (mean of difference, −2.2; 95% CI, −3.4 to −0.9). Furthermore, an increase in pulmonary function was also observed. Postoperative mean vital capacity increased from 2.5 to 3.1 L (mean of difference, 0.6 L; 95% CI, 0.3 to 1.0 L), whereas mean laryngeal resistance (n=14) decreased from 73.9 to 46.4 cmH2O/L/s (mean of difference, −27.5 cmH2O/L/s; 95%CI, −44.8 to −10.3 cmH2O/L/s) postoperatively.

Conclusions

Tracheal stenosis is a devastating condition that imposes impairments in respiratory, voice and overall quality-of-life. There is sufficient evidence through HRQL questionnaires that these patients experience poor self-esteem and a substantial decrease in the overall quality-of-life perception. Surgical airway reconstruction and endoscopic dilatational procedures appear to minimize those issues, by improvement of voice, breathing and physical status, and should be encouraged.
  15 in total

1.  Effects of tracheostomy on well-being and body-image perceptions.

Authors:  Dror Gilony; Dalia Gilboa; Tzvia Blumstein; Havi Murad; Yoav P Talmi; Jona Kronenberg; Michael Wolf
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.497

2.  Predictors for postoperative complications after tracheal resection.

Authors:  Benoit Jacques Bibas; Ricardo Mingarini Terra; Antonio Lopes Oliveira Junior; Mauro Federico Luis Tamagno; Helio Minamoto; Paulo Francisco Guerreiro Cardoso; Paulo Manuel Pêgo-Fernandes
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Surgical Management of Benign Acquired Tracheoesophageal Fistulas: A Ten-Year Experience.

Authors:  Benoit Jacques Bibas; Paulo Francisco Guerreiro Cardoso; Helio Minamoto; Leandro Picheth Eloy-Pereira; Mauro Federico L Tamagno; Ricardo Mingarini Terra; Paulo Manoel Pêgo-Fernandes
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-06-18       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Quality-of-Life Metrics Correlate With Disease Severity in Idiopathic Subglottic Stenosis.

Authors:  Matthew R Naunheim; Paul M Paddle; Inna Husain; Patcharamanee Wangchalabovorn; David Rosario; Ramon A Franco
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 5.  Prophylaxis and Treatment of Complications After Tracheal Resection.

Authors:  Paulo Francisco Guerreiro Cardoso; Benoit Jacques Bibas; Helio Minamoto; Paulo Manuel Pêgo-Fernandes
Journal:  Thorac Surg Clin       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.750

Review 6.  Surgery for intrathoracic tracheoesophageal and bronchoesophageal fistula.

Authors:  Benoit Jacques Bibas; Paulo Francisco Guerreiro Cardoso; Helio Minamoto; Paulo Manoel Pêgo-Fernandes
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-06

7.  Evaluation of Dyspnea Outcomes After Endoscopic Airway Surgery for Laryngotracheal Stenosis.

Authors:  Idris Samad; Lee Akst; Selmin Karatayli-Özgürsoy; Kristine Teets; Marissa Simpson; Ashwyn Sharma; Simon R A Best; Alexander T Hillel
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 6.223

8.  Quality of life can be good after slide tracheoplasty for long-segment tracheal stenosis.

Authors:  Jo Wray; Matthew Ryde; Colin R Butler; Richard J Hewitt
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2019-12-01

9.  Voice quality in laryngotracheal stenosis: impact of dilation and level of stenosis.

Authors:  Alexander T Hillel; Selmin Karatayli-Ozgursoy; James R Benke; Simon Best; Paulette Pacheco-Lopez; Kristine Teets; Heather Starmer; Lee M Akst
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 1.547

10.  Voice Outcomes in Laryngotracheal Stenosis: Impact of the Montgomery T-tube.

Authors:  Vaninder K Dhillon; Lee M Akst; Simon R Best; Alexander T Hillel
Journal:  Clin Surg       Date:  2018-01-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.