Matthew R Naunheim1,2, Paul M Paddle1,3, Inna Husain4, Patcharamanee Wangchalabovorn2, David Rosario1,2, Ramon A Franco1,2. 1. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts. 2. Department of Otolaryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 3. Melbourne ENT Group, Melbourne, Australia. 4. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Rush Medical College, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Idiopathic subglottic stenosis (ISGS) can have significant impacts on quality of life (QOL), but it remains unclear how patients' subjective responses correlate with objective measurement of disease severity. Peak expiratory flow percentage (PEF%) has been shown to be an effective measure of disease severity in subglottic stenosis. This study aims to identify the key QOL questions correlated with PEF% and proposes a statistical model for prediction of disease severity. METHODS: Patients with ISGS presenting to an academic laryngologist were included retrospectively from 2012 to 2016. Peak expiratory flow percentage (age, sex, and height adjusted) was recorded for each visit, along with four validated QOL instruments (European QOL-Five Dimensions; RAND 36-Item Health Survey; Clinical COPD [Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease] Questionnaire; and the Airway, Dyspnea, Voice, and Swallowing Summary Assessment). A stepwise multiple linear regression was used to identify statistically significant independent variables correlated with PEF%, and a model was built with these variables. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were included, with a total of 271 patient encounters. Overall scores from each of the four QOL instruments were correlated with PEF% values recorded each visit (P < 0.05). Question responses correlating most positively included overall breathlessness, difficulty catching breath, cough within the past week, dyspnea with moderate activity, perception that voice changes are restricting social life, and overall general health (all P < 0.01). A model constructed using six nonoverlapping questions yielded an adjusted R2 of 0.58. CONCLUSION: Quality of life is correlated to PEF% in ISGS. Using a limited number of QOL questions, clinicians can predict objective worsening or improvement of disease severity, as measured by spirometry. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2b. Laryngoscope, 2017.
OBJECTIVES:Idiopathic subglottic stenosis (ISGS) can have significant impacts on quality of life (QOL), but it remains unclear how patients' subjective responses correlate with objective measurement of disease severity. Peak expiratory flow percentage (PEF%) has been shown to be an effective measure of disease severity in subglottic stenosis. This study aims to identify the key QOL questions correlated with PEF% and proposes a statistical model for prediction of disease severity. METHODS:Patients with ISGS presenting to an academic laryngologist were included retrospectively from 2012 to 2016. Peak expiratory flow percentage (age, sex, and height adjusted) was recorded for each visit, along with four validated QOL instruments (European QOL-Five Dimensions; RAND 36-Item Health Survey; Clinical COPD [Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease] Questionnaire; and the Airway, Dyspnea, Voice, and Swallowing Summary Assessment). A stepwise multiple linear regression was used to identify statistically significant independent variables correlated with PEF%, and a model was built with these variables. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were included, with a total of 271 patient encounters. Overall scores from each of the four QOL instruments were correlated with PEF% values recorded each visit (P < 0.05). Question responses correlating most positively included overall breathlessness, difficulty catching breath, cough within the past week, dyspnea with moderate activity, perception that voice changes are restricting social life, and overall general health (all P < 0.01). A model constructed using six nonoverlapping questions yielded an adjusted R2 of 0.58. CONCLUSION: Quality of life is correlated to PEF% in ISGS. Using a limited number of QOL questions, clinicians can predict objective worsening or improvement of disease severity, as measured by spirometry. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2b. Laryngoscope, 2017.
Authors: Sabina Dang; Justin R Shinn; Benjamin R Campbell; Gaelyn Garrett; Christopher Wootten; Alexander Gelbard Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2019-07-29 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Linda X Yin; William V Padula; Shekhar Gadkaree; Kevin Motz; Sabrina Rahman; Zachary Predmore; Alexander Gelbard; Alexander T Hillel Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2018-11-27 Impact factor: 3.497
Authors: Matthew R Naunheim; Jennifer B Dai; Benjamin J Rubinstein; Leanne Goldberg; Alan Weinberg; Mark S Courey Journal: Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol Date: 2019-12-17
Authors: Matthew R Naunheim; Allen S Zhou; Elefteria Puka; Ramon A Franco; Thomas L Carroll; Stephanie E Teng; Pavan S Mallur; Phillip C Song Journal: Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol Date: 2020-10-30
Authors: Benoit Jacques Bibas; Paulo Francisco Guerreiro Cardoso; Helio Minamoto; Paulo Manoel Pêgo-Fernandes Journal: Transl Cancer Res Date: 2020-03 Impact factor: 1.241