Literature DB >> 35116576

Identification of key mutations in central nervous diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) by comprehensive analysis between sequencing and TCGA database.

Chunhui Zhou1,2, Yong Cui3, Haomin Sun1,2, Fan Yang1, Hao Zhao1, Luokai Huangfu1, Jianning Zhang1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common type of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and hence, a comprehensive understanding based on the gene expression profile is imperative. Although several studies have identified some critical mutant genes of DLBCL, the disease in the central nervous system has not been investigated clearly. This study is aimed to identify some novel and important mutant genes of DLBCL in central nervous system.
METHODS: A total of 156 cases of central nervous tumors were collected from 2016 to 2018, in which the DLBCL cases were confirmed by H&E staining and immunohistochemistry. With the whole-genome high-throughput sequencing, the mutations of samples were identified. By matching with TCGA database, the common mutations of DLBCL were further confirmed.
RESULTS: Twelve cases were designated as DLBCL, of which 1 case was classified into germinal center B cell (GCB) subtype, and 11 cases were non-GCB subtypes. The gene mutation spectrum demonstrated that the most common substitutions of six single bases were C>T/G>A, wherein the mutation frequency of C(C>T) G was the highest. The most common type of mutation is missense, and the most frequently mutated genes included MYD88, LRP1B, CD79B, GNA13 and PIM1. Based on the TCGA database, finally, the 4 significantly mutated genes (SMG), including MYD88, PIM1, CD79B, and BTG1 common in the above groups, were identified.
CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, the analysis of the TCGA database and the results of the sequencing experiment displayed four mutations that might provide novel targets for the treatment of DLBCL. 2021 Translational Cancer Research. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL); significantly mutated genes (SMG); whole-genome high-throughput sequencing

Year:  2021        PMID: 35116576      PMCID: PMC8799296          DOI: 10.21037/tcr-20-2525

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Cancer Res        ISSN: 2218-676X            Impact factor:   1.241


Introduction

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common type of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, accounting for approximately 40% of the adult cases (1). Due to the considerable heterogeneity of pathology in various DLBCLs, patients exhibit different responses to treatment and prognosis (2). Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of DLBCL by the gene expression profile is necessary. Although several studies have identified some critical mutant genes of DLBCL, including EZH2, FOXP1, and TP53 (3-5), the disease in the central nervous system (CNS) is yet to be elucidated. Actually, the CNS DLBCL, to some degree is different from DLBCL in many aspects including original cells, pathological characteristics and pathogenic gene. Interestingly, CNS DLBCL, especially the primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) is a B-cell lymphoma in the CNS where very few B lymphocytes, if any, are found under normal circumstances (6). Some studies have indicated that PCNSL is of germinal center B cell (GCB) origin (2,3). According to a gene expression study, non-CNS DLBCL has been classified into three groups: GCB type, activated B cell (ABC) type, and type 3 (7,8). Studies have found that some gene mutations are closely related to the occurrence and development of CNS DLBCL, such as the deletion of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) epitopes on chromosome p21 and the deletion of chromosomes 6q21-6q25. B cell differentiation regulator, tumor suppressor PRDM1, tyrosine phosphatase PTPRK, and MyD88 have also been identified as the critical mutations (9-12). However, due to the different research background, race and sample collection method, many studies usually obtained widely varied results. Thus, in the present study, we performed a genome-wide sequencing of 12 cases of DLBCL in the CNS and analyzed their characteristics to find some critical mutations involved in the development of the disease. In addition, we analyzed the TCGA database and compared the findings with the results of gene sequencing; finally, four mutations that overlapped in both methods were identified. We present the following article in accordance with the MDAR reporting checklist (available at https://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-20-2525).

Methods

Patients

A total of 156 cases of central nervous tumors at the Naval General Hospital were collected from 2016 to 2018. All patients approved the specimen collection and experimental analysis. According to the classification criteria of 2016 WHO, DLBCL was identified through H&E staining and immunohistochemistry by two senior pathologists who specialized in lymphoma. Finally, 12 cases of tumor tissues with positive expression of CD10, Bcl-6, and MUM1 were selected, and the adjacent tissues were used as controls. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in 2013). The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Chinese Naval General Hospital (NGH31278239). This study was retrospectively registered and all participants consented to this trial.

Immunohistochemical staining and immunophenotyping

All specimens were embedded in paraffin, sliced into 4-µM sections, and stained by H&E. The immunophenotype of the tumor and background cells was detected by ChemMate EnVisionTM kit. After antigen retrieval, the sections were probed with the antibodies against CD20 (1:800, Catalog number: #48750), CD79a (1:100, Catalog number: #13333), CD3 (1:100, Catalog number: #85061), CD45RO (1:800, Catalog number: #55618), Bcl-6 (1:10, Catalog number: #89369), CD10 (1:200, Catalog number: #PA0131), Bcl-2 (1:50, Catalog number: #15071), CD30 (1:200, Catalog number: #54535), ALK (1:25, Catalog number: #3633), MUM1 (1:400, Catalog number: #62834), and CD138 (1:100, Catalog number: #12922), and developed using automated immunohistochemistry instrument (Dako). Except for CD10 (Novocastra), all the antibodies were obtained from CST with positive and negative controls. According to Hans’ typing method (13), DLBCL could be divided into GCB subtypes and non-GCB subtypes, among which, CD10(+)/bcl-6(+/−)/MUM1(+/−) and CD10(−)/bcl-6(+)/MUM1(−) are classified into GCB subtype, and the rest are non-GCB subtypes.

Sequencing experiment

Our panel was designed to encompass the whole exon regions (including parts of the intron regions). The TruSeq Custom Panel (Kaiao, Beijing, China) was designed using the online software Design Studio, which consisted of 291 pairs of probes. All regions were designed to bind the genomic target sequences of interest, spanning a length of 41.27 kb of genomic DNA. The panel used to sequence the patients with a diagnosis of DLBCL encompassed the complete exon regions of the genes. Referring to this 20-gene panel, a total of 531 amplicons targeting 338 coding sequences, 72.358 kbp size and 99.79% coverage, were designed using the Ion Torrent S5 sequencing platform. All specimen was tested three times.

Data analysis

The original data were analyzed by GCOS 1.2 software to evaluate the results of a single chip that were was input into GeneSprin97.2 for further analysis. The probe group with original signal value <50 in the 12 samples was removed and subjected to one-way ANOVA. Subsequently, the expression probe group with >2-fold the change in the expression level between any two groups (P<0.01) was selected, and the unsupervised hierarchical cluster analysis was performed according to these probe groups to divide the cases into four groups: A, B, C, and D. K indicated that the clustering method was used to analyze the genes with consistent expression trend in each group. According to Guoling You’s method (14). Reads that matched exonic regions, including exon-intron boundaries, were analyzed. Single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and insertions/deletions (Indels) were analyzed using different filtering steps. Genes with at least one heterozygous change in the DNA sequence were considered to be the most likely to cause disease. In each case, all variants listed in the most recent version of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) database (dbSNP) were excluded. Silent mutations were also excluded. Low-frequency frameshift and truncating mutations were considered pathogenic. In addition, genes that were expressed in one of the samples and not expressed in the other two groups were also screened for specific expression in each group. All the screened genes were classified according to the biological functions and then categorized into their respective signaling pathways. Gene chip manipulation and data analysis personnel were blinded to the case immunophenotyping. Furthermore, enrichment annotation of unique Entrez Gene IDs using the selected functional categories, Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) of Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) were performed using the Gene Set Analysis Toolkit (Gestalt, http://bioinfo.vanderbilt.edu/webgestalt), and the pathway files were compiled from the KEGG pathway (http://www.genome.jp/kegg/pathway.html).

Evaluation of gene expression via TCGA database

TCGA database (https://cancergenome.nih.gov/) has been made publicly available to provide genomic information on 33 types of cancer, which would be valuable for the researchers to improve the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of the cancers. The gene mutation data of 34 DLBCL cases were downloaded from the database.

Statistical analysis

All data were analyzed using SPSS, version 19.0 software for Windows (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA, Code OZNINMOO6TT8K87M54YUMJD9Z8YST44XHH99A8M6TE2KJ3) and R version 3.4.1. Continuous variables are presented as the mean and standard deviation. A chi-square test was performed to evaluate the differences in categorical variables among different defined groups. One-way ANOVA was used to determine the differences in numerical variables among the groups.

Results

Clinicopathological characteristics of patients

A total of 156 cases of central nervous tumors were collected from 2016 to 2018. H&E staining and immunohistochemistry revealed that 12 cases were designated as DLBCL, of which 1 case was classified into GCB subtype, and 11 cases were non-GCB subtypes according to CD10, Bcl-6, and MUM1 staining. Each DLBCL specimen of the 12 cases was numbered and named accordingly (). The cohort consisted of 83.3% (10 cases) males and 16.7% (2 cases) females, suggesting that males may be more susceptible to DLBCL than females (). The age of the patients was 30–70 years old (), with most 41.7% (5 cases) 61–70 years old.
Table 1

Serial number and names of 12 central nervous DLBCLs

No.Sample namePathological diagnosis
1LAADOEDLBCL
2LAAEH1DLBCL
3LAAFVXT1DLBCL
4LBE0702TDLBCL (derived from germinal center)
5LAAFT4DLBCL (right cerebellum)
6LAL2051TDLBCL
7LBC7255TDLBCL (derived from peripheral activated B cells)
8LBC6300TDLBCL
9LBD9753TDLBCL
10LBD9748TDLBCL (fourth ventricle)
11LBG4713TDLBCL (derived from peripheral activated B cells)
12LBG6976TDLBCL

DLBCL, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Figure 1

Clinical characteristics of 12 cases of central nervous DLBCL at the Naval General Hospital from 2016 to 2018. (A) Gender ratio of the patient. (B) Age distribution of the patient. DLBCL, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

DLBCL, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Clinical characteristics of 12 cases of central nervous DLBCL at the Naval General Hospital from 2016 to 2018. (A) Gender ratio of the patient. (B) Age distribution of the patient. DLBCL, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Analysis of the sequencing experiment of 12 cases

The whole-genome high-throughput sequencing results of the 12 clinical samples were analyzed. The gene mutation spectrum demonstrated that the most common substitutions of six single bases were C>T/G>A (). Subsequently, the pattern figure was performed, wherein the mutation frequency of C(C>T) G was the highest (). Furthermore, the enrichment analysis (GO and KEGG) of genes with somatic mutations in all samples revealed that the mutated genes are mainly involved in tumor proliferation and metabolism (). The signaling pathways included Wnt, Bcl-2, Rb, and other signaling pathways related to tumor proliferation, apoptosis, and cell cycle (). Finally, the mutations with frequencies significantly higher than the background mutation frequency were identified as significantly mutated genes (SMG), and the heat map was constructed accordingly. The results demonstrated that the most common type of mutation is missense, and the most frequently mutated genes included MYD88, LRP1B, CD79B, GNA13 and PIM1. However, it is worth noting that two samples named LAADOET1 and LBG4G13T didn’t detect the insertion-deletion (InDel) ().
Figure 2

Gene mutation analysis of 12 DLBCL samples. Data of high-throughput sequencing of 12 cases of central nervous system DLBCL for the analysis of base substitution types (A,B), pattern figure of mutant genes (C), GO analysis (D), KEGG analysis (E). The SMG were further screened, and the heat map (F) of the high-frequency mutant gene was drawn. In the GO analysis chart, the ordinate indicates the pathway, and the abscissa indicates the enrichment rate. The dot size indicates the sum of the gene enriched in the pathway and the dot color represents the significance of enrichment. In the high-frequency mutated gene heat map, the top 50 genes were analyzed statistically. DLBCL, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; SMG, significantly mutated genes; GO, Gene Ontology.

Gene mutation analysis of 12 DLBCL samples. Data of high-throughput sequencing of 12 cases of central nervous system DLBCL for the analysis of base substitution types (A,B), pattern figure of mutant genes (C), GO analysis (D), KEGG analysis (E). The SMG were further screened, and the heat map (F) of the high-frequency mutant gene was drawn. In the GO analysis chart, the ordinate indicates the pathway, and the abscissa indicates the enrichment rate. The dot size indicates the sum of the gene enriched in the pathway and the dot color represents the significance of enrichment. In the high-frequency mutated gene heat map, the top 50 genes were analyzed statistically. DLBCL, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; SMG, significantly mutated genes; GO, Gene Ontology.

Identification of mutations associated with DLBCL based on TCGA database

In addition to sequencing analysis, we also utilized the TCGA database and analyzed the sequencing results of the DLBCL cases. Firstly, we retrieved all the DLBCL cases (without limitation of the primary site) and identified 34 cases involving 70 SMGs. Next, to specifically compare these results with those of our sequencing experiments, the DLBCL cases limited in the brain were also retrieved from the TCGA database. Consequently, only 2 cases were available, and 12 mutations were identified; hence, all DLBCL cases (without limitation of the primary site) were analyzed. A majority of these cases exhibited missense mutations (), and the most common substitution of the base was C>T/G>A (), which was consistent with the result of our sequencing experiments. Finally, a heat map indicating the SMGs was drawn (), wherein mutations in the PIM1, IRF4, CD79B, and KMT2D genes were overlapped.
Figure 3

Identification of mutations associated with DLBCL based on the TCGA database. The data of DLBCL cases (unlimited organization type) in the TCGA database were extracted, and the gene mutation types (A) and base substitutions (B) of 34 DLBCL samples were analyzed. In addition, a heat map indicated significantly mutated genes (C). DLBCL, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Identification of mutations associated with DLBCL based on the TCGA database. The data of DLBCL cases (unlimited organization type) in the TCGA database were extracted, and the gene mutation types (A) and base substitutions (B) of 34 DLBCL samples were analyzed. In addition, a heat map indicated significantly mutated genes (C). DLBCL, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Comparative analysis between results from the sequencing experiment and TCGA database

The sequencing results of the 12 cases of the CNS DLBCL samples and the data analysis from the TCGA database were used for screening many high-frequency mutation genes. However, due to different sources of samples and processing methods, the selected SMGs also varied. Thus, we combined the mutated gene data obtained from 12 samples (Seq-DLBC-Brain) with the sequencing data from the TCGA database (TCGA-DLBC-Full) to identify the mutations in common. Moreover, to match the sequencing results, we also enrolled the data of two cases of DLBCL in the CNSs (TCGA-DLBC-Brain). Based on the above data, four mutations, including those in MYD88, PIM1, CD79B, and BTG1, were identified in common ().
Figure 4

Comparative analysis between results from sequencing and TCGA database. The significantly mutated genes from 12 cases were compared with the results from the TCGA database to find the co-labeled mutated genes, and accordingly, the Venn diagram was constructed. TCGA-DLBC-Full and TCGA-DLBC-Brain represent DLBCL cases with no limitation of the primary site or primary location in the brain from the TCGA database. Seq-DLBC-Brain indicates data from the sequencing of 12 central nervous system DLBCL cases. There were 4 significantly mutated genes in common. DLBCL, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Comparative analysis between results from sequencing and TCGA database. The significantly mutated genes from 12 cases were compared with the results from the TCGA database to find the co-labeled mutated genes, and accordingly, the Venn diagram was constructed. TCGA-DLBC-Full and TCGA-DLBC-Brain represent DLBCL cases with no limitation of the primary site or primary location in the brain from the TCGA database. Seq-DLBC-Brain indicates data from the sequencing of 12 central nervous system DLBCL cases. There were 4 significantly mutated genes in common. DLBCL, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Discussion

In recent years, high-throughput sequencing technology has played a major role in the study of tumors. It has effectively detected mutant genes in tumors, and analyzed the mutations in detail, which has provided valuable clues for the follow-up of tumor treatment (15-17). However, due to the different sources of tumor samples and varied treatment methods, the results of detection by various institutions differ markedly. Therefore, comparing the sequencing results of different institutions to expand the sample size is critical for finding effective target genes (18,19). Aimed at DLBCL, this study firstly analyzed the sequencing results, and the high-frequency mutation gene was selected. These results were combined with the data of the TCGA database, and as a result, and mutant genes in common were identified that were designated as the potential target mutations. The present study enrolled 12 cases of DLBCL in the CNS. Since only a few reports have specifically studied DLBCL in the CNS, the current data and analysis might provide an important reference for the research of DLBCL in the CNS. Interestingly, 10/12 cases were males, and the age of the cohort was 61–70 years. The results of high-throughput sequencing of the samples revealed that the most common mutations were missense with C>T/G>A, accounting for the highest rate of single base substitutions, which was consistent with the results obtained using the TCGA database. This finding indicated that the base substitution of C>T/G>A is common in DLBCL of the CNS and other tissues. Furthermore, the screening for SMGs identified the majority of the mutations in MYD88, LRP1B, CD79B, and PRDM1 genes. However, it is worth noting that two samples named LAADOET1 and LBG4G13T didn’t detect the InDel. As the other variation detection including SNV, structural variation (SV) and copy number variation (CNV) all have been identified, therefor the informational loss in InDel may be due to the characteristic of the sample themselves. In order to screen out the general and the targeted mutant genes, the intersection of the three groups of data, including 12 samples of sequencing experiment, all DLBCL (undefined tissue) data in the TCGA database, and the DLBCL data of the CNS in the TCGA database were analyzed. A pooled analysis indicated four mutant genes in common: MYD88, PIM1, CD79B, and BTG1. MYD88 is a cytosolic adapter protein that plays a central role in innate and adaptive immune responses (20,21). MYD88 mutations have been reported in DLBCL, suggesting its critical role in the development of DLBCL (22). Especially, the MYD88 L265P mutation rate in the CNS and testicular DLBCLs was reported to be 60% [3/5] (23). Although many studies have reported that MYD88 mutation is closely related to the occurrence of DLBCL, the mechanism remains unclear. However, as an adaptor of Toll-like receptors (TLRs), MYD88 mutation may not only affect the proliferation of lymphocyte, but also affect the surrounding immune environment, resulting in inactivation of tumor suppression (24). Zhu et al. (25) reported that a long-chain non-coding RNA, SNHG16, could promote the growth of DLBCL by up-regulating the expression of PIM1 via the miR-497-5p/PIM1 axis, thereby indicating that PIM1 may promote the proliferation of DLBCL. Takeuchi et al. (26) demonstrated that the CD79B mutation was also an important marker of CD5-positive DLBCL, and this mutation has been found in various tissues of DLBCL (27,28). B-cell translocation gene 1 (BTG1) is a member of the BTG/transducer of the Erb family. Previous studies have detected BTG1 mutations in DLBCL; however, the cases of DLBCL in the CNS have not been reported. The above results indicated that the mutant genes screened by sequencing and TCGA data had a correlation with DLBCL. Though carried out at different background and population, the results of our studies conform to many studies, including Pouzoulet et al. (29). Klanova et al. (30), Schmitz et al. (31), Chapuy et al. (32), Wright et al. (33). Among them, Pouzoulet collected six cases of PCNSL, and the CD79A, CD79B, PIM1, and Card11 were the most significant mutation. The study of Klanova identified the CDKN2A, MYD88, and CD79B as the most prominent mutation in PCNS. Our study identified MYD88, PIM1, CD79B, and BTG1 as an important mutation gene by sequencing combining the analysis of TCGA database. Together above results, there are many similarities between our and other studies, while some different mutations also identified. All these findings provide important view for comprehensive understanding the relationship between CNS DLBCL and genetic mutation. Taken together, the present study identified some novel and vital mutations to specifically indicate DLBCL in the CNS and subsequently provided potential treatment targets. Although four mutations detected in common between sequencing experiments and TCGA database were selected, there is no mutation could be associated with survival. Hence, additional clinical studies are essential for the identification of specific mutations.
  33 in total

1.  [Preliminary study of exon sequence in pneumoconiosis and pneumoconiosis complicated with lung cancer using high-throughput sequencing technology].

Authors:  M F Jiang; L Li; Z Wang; C L Zhang; H Zhang
Journal:  Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi       Date:  2017-11-20

2.  High prevalence of oncogenic MYD88 and CD79B mutations in primary testicular diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  W Kraan; M van Keimpema; H M Horlings; E J M Schilder-Tol; M E C M Oud; L A Noorduyn; P M Kluin; M J Kersten; M Spaargaren; S T Pals
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 11.528

3.  High throughput sequencing identifies breast cancer-secreted exosomal LncRNAs initiating pulmonary pre-metastatic niche formation.

Authors:  Tongbao Feng; Ping Zhang; Yingxin Sun; Yan Wang; Jichun Tong; Hong Dai; Zichun Hua
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 3.688

4.  Clinicopathologic significance and therapeutic implication of de novo CD5+ diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Huifen Tang; Hui Zhou; Juying Wei; Hui Liu; Wenbin Qian; Xiaohui Chen
Journal:  Hematology       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.269

5.  Frequent MYD88 L265P and CD79B Mutations in Primary Breast Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.

Authors:  Kohei Taniguchi; Katsuyoshi Takata; Shih-Sung Chuang; Tomoko Miyata-Takata; Yasuharu Sato; Akira Satou; Yuko Hashimoto; Maiko Tamura; Keina Nagakita; Nobuhiko Ohnishi; Mai Noujima-Harada; Tetsuya Tabata; Yara Yukie Kikuti; Yoshinobu Maeda; Naoya Nakamura; Mitsune Tanimoto; Tadashi Yoshino
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 6.394

6.  Next generation sequencing in cancer: opportunities and challenges for precision cancer medicine.

Authors:  Carmela Paolillo; Eric Londin; Paolo Fortina
Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl       Date:  2016-08-17

7.  Clinical aspects of TP53 gene inactivation in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Elena N Voropaeva; Tatyana I Pospelova; Mikhail I Voevoda; Vladimir N Maksimov; Yuriy L Orlov; Olga B Seregina
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 3.063

8.  MYD88, CD79B, and CARD11 gene mutations in CD5-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Toshifumi Takeuchi; Motoko Yamaguchi; Kyoko Kobayashi; Kana Miyazaki; Isao Tawara; Hiroshi Imai; Ryoichi Ono; Tetsuya Nosaka; Kyosuke Tanaka; Naoyuki Katayama
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-12-04       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  A Probabilistic Classification Tool for Genetic Subtypes of Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma with Therapeutic Implications.

Authors:  George W Wright; Da Wei Huang; James D Phelan; Zana A Coulibaly; Sandrine Roulland; Ryan M Young; James Q Wang; Roland Schmitz; Ryan D Morin; Jeffrey Tang; Aixiang Jiang; Aleksander Bagaev; Olga Plotnikova; Nikita Kotlov; Calvin A Johnson; Wyndham H Wilson; David W Scott; Louis M Staudt
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 31.743

10.  High-throughput screening of prostate cancer risk loci by single nucleotide polymorphisms sequencing.

Authors:  Peng Zhang; Ji-Han Xia; Jing Zhu; Ping Gao; Yi-Jun Tian; Meijun Du; Yong-Chen Guo; Sufyan Suleman; Qin Zhang; Manish Kohli; Lori S Tillmans; Stephen N Thibodeau; Amy J French; James R Cerhan; Li-Dong Wang; Gong-Hong Wei; Liang Wang
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.