Literature DB >> 35115677

Political audience diversity and news reliability in algorithmic ranking.

Saumya Bhadani1, Shun Yamaya2, Alessandro Flammini3, Filippo Menczer3, Giovanni Luca Ciampaglia4, Brendan Nyhan5.   

Abstract

Newsfeed algorithms frequently amplify misinformation and other low-quality content. How can social media platforms more effectively promote reliable information? Existing approaches are difficult to scale and vulnerable to manipulation. In this paper, we propose using the political diversity of a website's audience as a quality signal. Using news source reliability ratings from domain experts and web browsing data from a diverse sample of 6,890 US residents, we first show that websites with more extreme and less politically diverse audiences have lower journalistic standards. We then incorporate audience diversity into a standard collaborative filtering framework and show that our improved algorithm increases the trustworthiness of websites suggested to users-especially those who most frequently consume misinformation-while keeping recommendations relevant. These findings suggest that partisan audience diversity is a valuable signal of higher journalistic standards that should be incorporated into algorithmic ranking decisions.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35115677     DOI: 10.1038/s41562-021-01276-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Hum Behav        ISSN: 2397-3374


  18 in total

1.  Political science. Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook.

Authors:  Eytan Bakshy; Solomon Messing; Lada A Adamic
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Experimental study of inequality and unpredictability in an artificial cultural market.

Authors:  Matthew J Salganik; Peter Sheridan Dodds; Duncan J Watts
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-02-10       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

Authors:  Nir Grinberg; Kenneth Joseph; Lisa Friedland; Briony Swire-Thompson; David Lazer
Journal:  Science       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  The science of fake news.

Authors:  David M J Lazer; Matthew A Baum; Yochai Benkler; Adam J Berinsky; Kelly M Greenhill; Filippo Menczer; Miriam J Metzger; Brendan Nyhan; Gordon Pennycook; David Rothschild; Michael Schudson; Steven A Sloman; Cass R Sunstein; Emily A Thorson; Duncan J Watts; Jonathan L Zittrain
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  The spread of true and false news online.

Authors:  Soroush Vosoughi; Deb Roy; Sinan Aral
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Feeling validated versus being correct: a meta-analysis of selective exposure to information.

Authors:  William Hart; Dolores Albarracín; Alice H Eagly; Inge Brechan; Matthew J Lindberg; Lisa Merrill
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Exposure to untrustworthy websites in the 2016 US election.

Authors:  Andrew M Guess; Brendan Nyhan; Jason Reifler
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2020-03-02

8.  Neutral bots probe political bias on social media.

Authors:  Wen Chen; Diogo Pacheco; Kai-Cheng Yang; Filippo Menczer
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook.

Authors:  Andrew Guess; Jonathan Nagler; Joshua Tucker
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 14.136

10.  Evaluating the fake news problem at the scale of the information ecosystem.

Authors:  Jennifer Allen; Baird Howland; Markus Mobius; David Rothschild; Duncan J Watts
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 14.136

View more
  1 in total

1.  Measuring user engagement with low credibility media sources in a controversial online debate.

Authors:  Salvatore Vilella; Alfonso Semeraro; Daniela Paolotti; Giancarlo Ruffo
Journal:  EPJ Data Sci       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 3.630

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.