Literature DB >> 25953820

Political science. Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook.

Eytan Bakshy1, Solomon Messing2, Lada A Adamic3.   

Abstract

Exposure to news, opinion, and civic information increasingly occurs through social media. How do these online networks influence exposure to perspectives that cut across ideological lines? Using deidentified data, we examined how 10.1 million U.S. Facebook users interact with socially shared news. We directly measured ideological homophily in friend networks and examined the extent to which heterogeneous friends could potentially expose individuals to cross-cutting content. We then quantified the extent to which individuals encounter comparatively more or less diverse content while interacting via Facebook's algorithmically ranked News Feed and further studied users' choices to click through to ideologically discordant content. Compared with algorithmic ranking, individuals' choices played a stronger role in limiting exposure to cross-cutting content.
Copyright © 2015, American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25953820     DOI: 10.1126/science.aaa1160

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  115 in total

1.  Mining Social Media Data for Biomedical Signals and Health-Related Behavior.

Authors:  Rion Brattig Correia; Ian B Wood; Johan Bollen; Luis M Rocha
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Data Sci       Date:  2020-05-04

2.  Collective information processing in human phase separation.

Authors:  Bertrand Jayles; Ramón Escobedo; Roberto Pasqua; Christophe Zanon; Adrien Blanchet; Matthieu Roy; Gilles Tredan; Guy Theraulaz; Clément Sire
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Machine behaviour.

Authors:  Iyad Rahwan; Manuel Cebrian; Nick Obradovich; Josh Bongard; Jean-François Bonnefon; Cynthia Breazeal; Jacob W Crandall; Nicholas A Christakis; Iain D Couzin; Matthew O Jackson; Nicholas R Jennings; Ece Kamar; Isabel M Kloumann; Hugo Larochelle; David Lazer; Richard McElreath; Alan Mislove; David C Parkes; Alex 'Sandy' Pentland; Margaret E Roberts; Azim Shariff; Joshua B Tenenbaum; Michael Wellman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Detecting and modelling real percolation and phase transitions of information on social media.

Authors:  Jiarong Xie; Fanhui Meng; Jiachen Sun; Xiao Ma; Gang Yan; Yanqing Hu
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2021-04-01

5.  Anatomy of news consumption on Facebook.

Authors:  Ana Lucía Schmidt; Fabiana Zollo; Michela Del Vicario; Alessandro Bessi; Antonio Scala; Guido Caldarelli; H Eugene Stanley; Walter Quattrociocchi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Combining natural language processing and network analysis to examine how advocacy organizations stimulate conversation on social media.

Authors:  Christopher Andrew Bail
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Scientific communication in a post-truth society.

Authors:  Shanto Iyengar; Douglas S Massey
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Social Media Analyses for Social Measurement.

Authors:  Michael F Schober; Josh Pasek; Lauren Guggenheim; Cliff Lampe; Frederick G Conrad
Journal:  Public Opin Q       Date:  2016-01-13

9.  Overconfidence in news judgments is associated with false news susceptibility.

Authors:  Benjamin A Lyons; Jacob M Montgomery; Andrew M Guess; Brendan Nyhan; Jason Reifler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Tweeting PP: an analysis of the 2015-2016 Planned Parenthood controversy on Twitter.

Authors:  Leo Han; Lisa Han; Blair Darney; Maria I Rodriguez
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.