Literature DB >> 35111617

Non-weight-bearing short knee radiographs to evaluate coronal alignment before total knee arthroplasty.

Sheng Pan1, Chaoran Huang1, Xingchen Zhang1, Ruxin Ruan1, Ziwen Yan1, Zheng Li1, Yong Pang1, Kaijin Guo1, Xin Zheng1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Whole leg radiograph (WLR) is the gold standard in assessing lower limb alignment before total knee arthroplasty (TKA) although in practice, non-weight-bearing short knee radiographs (NWB SKRs) are used by most medical institutions. The objective of this study was to determine whether the femorotibial angle (FTA) could be used to evaluate lower limb alignment on limited NWB SKRs. We also investigated whether FTA alignment measurements on NWB SKRs and WLRs differed depending on the direction of knee deformity.
METHODS: In all, 105 knees which underwent both NWB SKR and WLR were included. Measurement of hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) was obtained through WLR, while the FTA was found using NWB SKR (FTASKR) and WLR (FTAWLR). All knees were divided into three groups based on the HKA. The Kappa statistic was used to compare the agreement of categorical alignment variables between the HKA and FTASKR. The agreement of the measurements obtained from the two radiographs was made using Bland-Altman plots and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Pearson correlation coefficient and simple linear regression analysis were also conducted to evaluate the correlation between different angles.
RESULTS: The agreement for categories of lower limb deformity was rated excellent (kappa =0.804, P<0.001). The Bland-Altman plot showed that the mean difference for the FTASKR and FTAWLR was 4.4°. There was an excellent correlation (r=0.861, P<0.001) and good reliability (ICC, 0.607) between the FTASKR and HKA. For the varus group, there was a good correlation between the FTASKR and HKA (r=0.650, P<0.001); however, there were no significant correlations between the FTAS KR and HKA in the neutral (r=0.106, P=0.543) and valgus groups (r=0.322, P=0.102).
CONCLUSIONS: For outpatient follow-up, we found that the FTA on NWB SKRs is an acceptable means for classifying knee alignment (varus, neutral, or valgus). The measurement on NWB SKR also showed excellent correlation and good agreement with the HKA. For varus knees, NWB SKR measurements showed the best correlation with the HKA. However, for neutral and valgus knees, NWB SKR measurements were insufficient for conducting a reliable calculation and quantification of coronal alignment of the lower limb. 2022 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Total knee arthroplasty (TKA); coronal alignment; femorotibial angle (FTA); mechanical axis; osteoarthritis (OA); short knee radiograph; whole leg radiograph (WLR)

Year:  2022        PMID: 35111617      PMCID: PMC8739098          DOI: 10.21037/qims-21-400

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg        ISSN: 2223-4306


  27 in total

1.  The role of knee alignment in disease progression and functional decline in knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  L Sharma; J Song; D T Felson; S Cahue; E Shamiyeh; D D Dunlop
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-07-11       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Radiographic analysis of the axial alignment of the lower extremity.

Authors:  J R Moreland; L W Bassett; G J Hanker
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  A comparative assessment of alignment angle of the knee by radiographic and physical examination methods.

Authors:  Virginia B Kraus; T Parker Vail; Ted Worrell; Gary McDaniel
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2005-06

4.  Does measurement of the anatomic axis consistently predict hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) for knee alignment studies in osteoarthritis? Analysis of long limb radiographs from the multicenter osteoarthritis (MOST) study.

Authors:  L Sheehy; D Felson; Y Zhang; J Niu; Y-M Lam; N Segal; J Lynch; T D V Cooke
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 6.576

5.  Measuring femoral and rotational alignment: EOS system versus computed tomography.

Authors:  D Folinais; P Thelen; C Delin; C Radier; Y Catonne; J Y Lazennec
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 2.256

6.  Association between valgus and varus alignment and the development and progression of radiographic osteoarthritis of the knee.

Authors:  G M Brouwer; A W van Tol; A P Bergink; J N Belo; R M D Bernsen; M Reijman; H A P Pols; S M A Bierma-Zeinstra
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2007-04

7.  Can anatomic alignment measured from a knee radiograph substitute for mechanical alignment from full limb films?

Authors:  D T Felson; T D V Cooke; J Niu; J Goggins; J Choi; J Yu; M C Nevitt
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 6.576

8.  Reliability and Validity of the Femorotibial Mechanical Axis Angle in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Navigation versus Weight Bearing or Supine Whole Leg Radiographs.

Authors:  Seong Hwan Kim; Yong-Beom Park; Min-Ku Song; Jung-Won Lim; Han-Jun Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2018-12-01

9.  Anatomical axis validation of lower extremity for different deformities: A radiological study.

Authors:  Meric Unal; Sabriye Ercan; Aydin Budeyri; Uğur Toprak; Abdülkerim Şalkaci
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2020-06-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.